Overview
Title
To amend title 11, United States Code, to improve protections for employees and retirees in business bankruptcies.
ELI5 AI
The bill H.R. 10538 says that when a company goes bankrupt, it should take care of its workers and retirees by making sure they get paid what they're owed before giving money to executives.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 10538 aims to enhance protections for employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. It proposes changes to how employees' wages, benefits, and retirement plans are prioritized in bankruptcy situations, ensuring they receive fair treatment and consideration. The bill also addresses limitations on executive compensation in such cases, ensuring that executives are not rewarded disproportionately when a company is struggling. It seeks to maintain jobs and protect employee interests, while allowing companies to reorganize fairly without putting employees at a disadvantage.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed "Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024" seeks to amend Title 11 of the United States Code. The bill's primary aim is to enhance financial protection and recovery for employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. Key elements include increasing wage priorities, protecting employee benefits, and restricting executive compensation. The legislation also addresses issues related to collective bargaining agreements, union claims, and other financial and legal rights amidst bankruptcy proceedings.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the major issues with the bill is the ambiguity in terms such as "priority" and "protection" when referring to financial contexts. This lack of clarity can lead to varying interpretations which may result in unintended legal outcomes. Furthermore, the bill is replete with complex legal jargon and references to other laws, such as the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code, which might complicate understanding for those not well-versed in legal matters.
The sections dealing with executive compensation (e.g., Section 301) lack detailed criteria for determining what constitutes excessive compensation, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement of these restrictions. Additionally, oversight mechanisms for validating claims of stock value losses within defined contribution plans, such as 401(k)s, are not clearly articulated, raising concerns about potential misuse or fraudulent claims.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill is designed to provide stronger safeguards for employees and retirees when their employers file for bankruptcy. By prioritizing wage claims and preserving benefits, it intends to cushion the financial blow workers might face in such situations. For the public, this signifies greater financial security and stability, knowing that there are statutory protections in place.
However, the lack of clarity and the complexity of some provisions might lead to enforcement difficulties or disputes, ultimately affecting the effectiveness of the protections intended by the legislation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Employees and Retirees: This group stands to benefit significantly from the bill, as its provisions prioritize their financial claims over other creditors in bankruptcy cases. Enhancements in wage protections and benefits could potentially provide them with greater economic security during turbulent financial times.
Business Owners and Executives: The restrictions on executive compensations could be viewed negatively by corporate leaders, particularly given the subjective nature of some terms and the lack of detailed criteria. This may lead to tensions between management and employees, especially when restructuring involves cuts in employee benefits while maintaining executive compensation.
Legal and Financial Practitioners: These professionals will face increased challenges in interpreting and applying the law due to its complexity and the necessity for cross-referencing various legal statutes. This could result in extended litigation or disputes, impacting efficiency and cost for businesses undergoing bankruptcy proceedings.
Overall, while the bill aims to strengthen protections for workers amid bankruptcies, the execution may falter given the identified ambiguities and the necessity for deeper legal comprehension to understand its full repercussions.
Financial Assessment
The bill H.R. 10538 introduces several financial references and priorities aimed at protecting employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. Here's a breakdown of how these financial elements are structured and what implications they may have:
Increased Wage Priority
The bill proposes an amendment to increase the wage priority cap from $10,000 to $20,000. This change ensures that employees can recover a higher amount of their unpaid wages if their employer files for bankruptcy. The bill seeks to recognize severance pay as fully earned upon termination, further emphasizing the need to protect the financial interests of employees during bankruptcy. By prioritizing these payments, the bill aims to safeguard employee earnings, but it also introduces the potential for differing interpretations of these provisions, as noted in the list of issues. This change might be seen as leveling the compensation playing field, but it could potentially lead to disputes over how these priorities are implemented.
Claim for Stock Value Losses
A particularly complex aspect is the claim for stock value losses in defined contribution plans. The bill specifies conditions under which such claims can be asserted, particularly if there has been fraud or duty breaches by the employer. However, the lack of specific oversight mechanisms for validating these claims raises concerns about potential fraudulent claims, as highlighted in the issues list. This indicates a gap in the bill that might require additional regulatory measures to ensure legitimate financial recoveries.
Priority for Severance Pay and Employee Benefits
The bill enhances the priority for severance pay and contributions to employee benefit plans, aiming to ensure that such payments are protected during bankruptcy proceedings. However, the bill limits the priority to exclude insiders, senior executives, and the highest compensated employees from these benefits. This exclusion may garner perceptions of inequity, potentially undermining labor relations, as outlined in the identified issues.
Financial Returns for Employees and Retirees
The bill includes provisions for the financial recovery of claims, particularly focusing on retiree benefits. However, these claims are vaguely defined, potentially allowing for broad interpretations. This lack of specificity could lead to financial exploitation or abuse, raising concerns about equitable distribution and fiscal responsibility.
Payments by Secured Lenders
Section 205 addresses the concept of unpaid employee obligations, such as wages and benefits, being deemed as reasonable costs covered by secured lenders. This provision suggests a financial shift, where obligations owed to employees could take precedence over other claims during asset distribution in a bankruptcy. This section's legal complexities may render it difficult for a general audience to interpret, which can lead to inconsistent enforcement.
Executive Compensation and Its Limitations
A significant focus of the bill is to restrict executive compensation in the wake of company bankruptcies. By outlining compensation restrictions for key executives and defining how these compensations should align with those of the nonmanagement workforce, the bill seeks to prevent disproportionate financial rewards. However, the absence of specific criteria for these restrictions could lead to subjective interpretations, complicating accountability efforts and potentially igniting public debate over fairness, as evidenced by the issues presented.
In conclusion, H.R. 10538 aims to prioritize financial allocations towards safeguarding employee and retiree earnings during bankruptcy. While it lays out several financial protections, the bill's lack of precise definitions and oversight mechanisms could result in varied interpretations and applications, possibly undermining its intended protective measures. Each financial reference is crafted to shift focus towards those traditionally vulnerable during corporate restructures, yet these references may necessitate further refinement to ensure equitable enforcement and clarity.
Issues
The ambiguity in the terms 'priority' and 'protection' in financial contexts, such as in Section 1 regarding executive compensation restrictions and union claims, could lead to differing interpretations and unintended legal outcomes, impacting stakeholders' understanding and compliance with the law.
Section 301's provisions regarding compensation restrictions for insiders and senior executives lack specific criteria, potentially leading to subjective interpretations and unequal application, garnering public concern about fairness and accountability in executive compensation.
The lack of oversight or control mechanisms in Section 102 for determining or validating claims of stock value losses and fraud could lead to enforcement difficulties and potentially fraudulent claims by participants in defined contribution plans.
The complexity and legal jargon pervasive in the bill, such as in sections 205 and 563, may render it inaccessible to laypersons, creating difficulties in understanding and enforcing new legal standards across various stakeholders.
In Section 106, the exclusion of specific high-compensated roles from certain severance and benefits eligibility could lead to perceptions of inequity and possibly weaken labor relations, fostering socio-political debate around labor rights during bankruptcy.
Section 202 introduces ambiguity in the language concerning 'mutually satisfactory modifications' and 'reasonable times,' which might hinder effective negotiation and insurance benefit payments for retired employees, potentially drawing negative attention to retiree protection measures.
Throughout the legislation, numerous complex legal references (e.g., ERISA, Internal Revenue Code) require cross-referencing and a high level of legal understanding, possibly resulting in misinterpretation by those unfamiliar with these laws and causing inconsistent application.
Section 403's strict limitations on modifying collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act without clear legal processes for necessary changes might be seen as a favoring mechanism, raising concerns about fairness across different industries.
The amendment in Section 104 allowing claims of 'recovery of claims' without specific limits or conditions could lead to potential financial exploitation or abuse, sparking concerns over fiscal responsibility and equitable distribution of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The “Protecting Employees and Retirees in Business Bankruptcies Act of 2024” outlines measures to improve financial recoveries and protections for employees and retirees during business bankruptcies. It includes enhancing wage priorities, protecting benefits, restricting executive compensation, and addressing collective bargaining and union claims to mitigate losses.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section identifies that business bankruptcies have risen significantly and are affecting job security and retirement, while existing laws to protect workers in such situations are inadequate. It emphasizes the need for legal changes to better support employees and retirees, as management compensation plans often escape sufficient examination amid these bankruptcies.
101. Increased wage priority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends section 507(a) of title 11 of the United States Code to increase the priority cap for wages from $10,000 to $20,000 and specifies that severance pay is earned in full when an employee is laid off or terminated. It also changes the calculation for employee benefit plans, setting it at $20,000 per employee involved in such plans.
Money References
- Section 507(a) of title 11, United States Code, is amended— (1) in paragraph (4)— (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; (B) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, by inserting “(A)” before “Fourth”; (C) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated— (i) by striking “$10,000” and inserting “$20,000”; (ii) by striking “within 180 days”; and (iii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first,”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(B) Severance pay described in subparagraph (A)(i) shall be deemed earned in full upon the layoff or termination of employment of the individual to whom the severance is owed.”; and (2) in paragraph (5)— (A) in subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking “within 180 days”; and (ii) by striking “or the date of the cessation of the debtor’s business, whichever occurs first”; and (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: “(B) for each such plan, to the extent of the number of employees covered by each such plan, multiplied by $20,000.”.
102. Claim for stock value losses in defined contribution plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to Title 11 of the United States Code allows individuals in defined contribution plans, like 401(k)s, to claim stock value losses if the stock was part of their plan and the company they work for has committed fraud or violated duties, causing the stock's value to drop. This protection is for employees who are not top executives or well-compensated insiders.
103. Priority for severance pay and contributions to employee benefit plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text amends Section 503(b) of the United States Code to clarify that severance pay for employees of a bankrupt company, except for certain high-level executives and consultants, is considered fully earned when employees are laid off. It also ensures that contributions to employee benefit plans, due after a bankruptcy filing, are included as priorities in bankruptcy proceedings.
104. Financial returns for employees and retirees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill amends title 11 of the United States Code to ensure that a debtor's financial plan includes continuing the payment of retiree benefits and allows claims for changes to those benefits. Additionally, it requires plans to address financial returns or damages for the rejection of collective bargaining agreements, as negotiated between the debtor and authorized representatives.
105. Priority for WARN Act damages Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to ensure that any back pay, civil penalty, or damages due to violations of Federal or State labor laws, including the WARN Act, are prioritized in the same way as wages and benefits in bankruptcy proceedings.
201. Rejection of collective bargaining agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines rules for rejecting collective bargaining agreements in a bankruptcy case, stating that a debtor or trustee must negotiate in good faith with the labor organization and can only reject the agreement if certain conditions are met, such as proving it's necessary for financial reorganization. It also allows for temporary modifications during negotiations and provides some protections for workers, while ensuring the debtor can continue to operate and reorganize effectively.
202. Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines changes to the United States Code about how retiree benefits can be modified during a debtor's bankruptcy proceedings. It specifies the process for making modifications, the conditions under which a court can approve modifications, and emphasizes fair treatment of retirees while ensuring that changes help the debtor exit bankruptcy without unfair burdens on the retirees.
203. Protection of employee benefits in a sale of assets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to prioritize preserving employee jobs, maintaining employment terms, and matching pension and health benefits when selling or leasing a debtor's property. This means that if there are competing offers to buy or lease, the court must choose the one that best protects workers' interests.
204. Claim for pension losses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to allow a court to recognize claims by active or retired participants, or their labor organizations, in pension plans that have been terminated. It allows for claims related to shortfalls in defined benefit plans due to plan termination and sets guidelines for claims in defined contribution plans based on stock value changes.
205. Payments by secured lender Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law to require that if a debtor's employees have not been paid wages or other compensations like vacation or severance after filing for bankruptcy, these unpaid amounts are considered necessary costs for maintaining or selling assets. This means the trustee must collect these funds from the debtor to pay the employees or their benefit plans, even if any agreements suggest otherwise.
206. Preservation of jobs and benefits Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to Chapter 11 of the United States Code emphasize the importance of reorganizing businesses to maximize their value and maintain jobs. It requires that reorganization plans prioritize preserving business value and employment, with preference given to plans that best achieve these goals, especially those involving agreements with employee labor organizations.
1100. Statement of purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A debtor filing a case under this chapter aims to reorganize its business to keep it running successfully by making the best use of its assets and protecting jobs that contribute to the economy.
207. Termination of exclusivity Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to state that there are certain situations where the standard 120-day or 180-day period for exclusive rights can be shortened. This includes cases where a motion is filed to reject a collective bargaining agreement if an alternative plan is likely to be accepted soon, or if a new plan from someone other than the debtor includes terms from a labor organization settlement and is also likely to be accepted soon.
208. Claim for withdrawal liability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing law to specify that if a company withdraws from a multi-employer pension plan after starting a bankruptcy case, the company must pay an amount equal to the total pension benefits earned by their employees during the bankruptcy period up until the withdrawal.
301. Executive compensation upon exit from bankruptcy Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies executive compensation rules for companies coming out of bankruptcy, ensuring that payments or benefits to top executives or highly paid employees are part of a program for all full-time employees and are not excessively higher than pay for non-management employees. Additionally, any compensation must be court-approved to be reasonable compared to similar roles in the industry and cannot be excessive given the company's financial situation.
302. Limitations on executive compensation enhancements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends U.S. bankruptcy law to add limitations on executive compensation enhancements for certain employees of a bankrupt company. It specifies that incentives, bonuses, and other compensation increases for top executives, managers, and consultants are subject to stringent conditions and court approval to ensure fair treatment for all employees.
303. Prohibition against special compensation payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it is stated that no financial plans or benefits for insiders, top executives, or certain other employees of a company will be approved if the company, within one year before filing for bankruptcy, has stopped or reduced severance pay for its non-management workers. Additionally, for specific transactions, the trustee must get court approval after notifying those involved and giving them a chance to be heard.
304. Assumption of executive benefit plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the United States Code to prohibit the assumption of deferred compensation arrangements and retiree benefit plans for high-level executives and highly compensated employees if certain employee benefit plans have been terminated or reduced.
305. Recovery of executive compensation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would allow a court to require the return of part of executive compensation if a company reduces employee benefits or if a pension plan gets terminated before bankruptcy. If these conditions are met, the trustee or others may pursue reimbursement of any compensation given to key company executives shortly before bankruptcy to help pay the company's debts.
563. Recovery of executive compensation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a company's financial obligations are reduced due to changes in employee or retiree benefit plans, the court will determine how much these obligations have decreased. The company must then return a matching percentage of compensation paid to top executives or board members. If no one takes action to recover this money before a certain deadline, any interested party can seek court approval to do so. The company cannot give post-bankruptcy compensation to those executives or board members if it's meant to replace the money retrieved under this rule.
306. Preferential compensation transfer Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes a change to allow a trustee to reclaim any transfer made within a year before a company files for bankruptcy if it benefits insiders, high-paid employees, or consultants related to the debtor. If the trustee or a committee fails to act, other interested parties can ask the court for permission to claim these transfers for the benefit of the estate.
401. Union proof of claim Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 401 amends Section 501(a) of title 11 of the United States Code to explicitly include labor organizations in the definition of who can be considered a creditor.
402. Exception from automatic stay Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the United States bankruptcy law by adding an exception to the automatic stay rule. It allows grievance or arbitration proceedings related to a collective bargaining agreement to continue or start against someone who has filed for bankruptcy, and also permits the enforcement of an award or settlement from such proceedings.
403. Effect on collective bargaining agreements under the Railway Labor Act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that in bankruptcy cases involving debtors under the Railway Labor Act, courts and trustees can't modify wages, working conditions, or retirement benefits defined by a collective bargaining agreement unless it's done following the specific rules of the Railway Labor Act.