Overview
Title
To facilitate efficient investments and financing of infrastructure projects and new job creation through the establishment of a National Infrastructure Development Bank, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The National Infrastructure Development Bank Act of 2023 is like a plan to create a big money bank that helps build important things like roads and bridges across the country, so people can have more jobs. This bank will have lots of money, but we have to be careful that it is used fairly and not wasted.
Summary AI
The National Infrastructure Development Bank Act of 2023 proposes the creation of a National Infrastructure Development Bank to promote efficient investment and financing for infrastructure projects across the United States. This bank would support various types of projects, such as transportation, energy, and environmental infrastructure, with an emphasis on projects that stimulate job creation and economic growth. The bill outlines the bank's structure, responsibilities, and eligibility criteria for project funding, and it requires adherence to specific federal laws, such as labor standards and domestic content requirements. Additionally, the legislation authorizes the appropriation of funds to establish and capitalize the bank.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "National Infrastructure Development Bank Act of 2023" aims to establish a new entity to facilitate investments and financing for infrastructure projects across the United States. This proposed National Infrastructure Development Bank is designed to work with various infrastructure domains—including energy, transportation, telecommunications, and environmental projects—while promoting economic growth and creating jobs. It seeks to operate independently from other federal institutions, with appointments to its leadership and committees prescribed within the Act.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill introduces the concept of a National Infrastructure Development Bank, intended to serve as a financial institution aimed at facilitating development projects. Its responsibilities include offering loans, guaranteeing financing, and providing technical assistance for various infrastructure endeavors. Key leadership positions, such as the Director and Deputy Director, are appointed by the President with Senate approval. The bank is also equipped with several committees tasked with risk management and compliance auditing. This legislative effort emphasizes the need for federal oversight and guidance in financing critical infrastructure deemed beneficial to the public interest.
Summary of Significant Issues
Throughout the bill, several areas present potential issues that warrant attention:
Independence and Oversight: The establishment of the Bank as an "independent establishment" lacks clear definitions about its operations and oversight mechanisms. This invites concerns regarding transparency and the potential misuse of funds.
Director's Power: The Director is granted considerable authority, including the ability to determine loan terms and indemnify directors and officers. Without sufficient checks, these powers might be prone to potential misuse or favoritism.
Term and Appointment Concerns: The bill allows for the Director and Deputy Director to serve lengthy terms of ten years, potentially reducing accountability and adaptability. There is a provision for these individuals to continue serving even if their term has expired, until successors are appointed.
Broad Definitions and Criteria: Definitions of terms such as "Development" and "Entity" are broad, which might result in ambiguities and subjective interpretations influencing project selection and resource allocation.
'BUY AMERICA' Provision: While promoting domestic production might benefit local industries, the requirements are stringent and include provisions for exceptions that might inadvertently favor particular entities, thus causing potential inconsistencies in fair competition.
Impact on the Public
If enacted, the bill could lead to positive developments by creating jobs and modernizing infrastructure. Public services might see enhancements, potentially benefiting various segments of society, from urban areas needing improved transportation to rural communities requiring better telecommunications.
However, several stakeholders might face varying impacts. Contractors and laborers could benefit from fair wage practices, though project costs may increase due to prevailing wage requirements. On the other hand, potential delays due to bureaucratic processes or funding allocation issues might arise, impacting the timely execution of projects.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: These entities will collaborate closely with the Bank, ensuring projects align with regional and national priorities. However, their operational scope might overlap with the Bank's initiatives, requiring clear communication and coordination.
Local Communities and Businesses: Rural and disadvantaged communities may gain access to improved infrastructure, fostering local economic development. Conversely, businesses depending on non-U.S. sourced materials may find themselves disadvantaged due to the stringent domestic content requirements.
Financial Institutions and Investors: These stakeholders might welcome the Bank's establishment as it represents an additional opportunity for financing and risk-sharing in major infrastructure projects. However, the Bank’s operations need to be defined clearly to ensure competitiveness and equitable treatment across the market.
In summary, while the National Infrastructure Development Bank Act of 2023 proposes comprehensive measures to enhance infrastructure development across the U.S., several areas within the bill necessitate further scrutiny to ensure fairness, accountability, and effective implementation.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, H.R. 10525, outlines the establishment of a National Infrastructure Development Bank aimed at efficiently investing in and financing infrastructure projects. This legislative effort includes detailed provisions regarding financial allocations and the management of funds intended to relate to its broader goals of job creation and economic growth.
A primary financial component of the bill is found in Section 13, which authorizes the appropriation of $5,000,000,000 annually for the fiscal years 2027 through 2031. This significant allocation is intended to capitalize the bank and provide it with the financial resources necessary to support infrastructure projects. The bill specifies that these funds will remain available until expended, indicating a degree of financial flexibility which, however, raises concerns about the potential for wasteful spending due to a lack of detailed goals or oversight mechanisms.
The financial discretion given to the Director of the Bank, as detailed in Section 5, is another critical aspect of the bill. The Director is empowered to determine loan terms and conditions, which includes the capacity to make substantial financial decisions such as senior and subordinated direct loans and loan guarantees for infrastructure projects. These powers, described as being at the "sole discretion of the Director," might lead to issues related to favoritism and potential misuse of funds, as the Director's activity lacks comprehensive oversight, which could be concerning given the significant amount of public money involved.
In Section 11, the bill introduces "BUY AMERICA" provisions, requiring that all iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in projects financed by the Bank be produced in the United States. While this aims to bolster domestic industries, there is a clause for exceptions when these provisions prove inconsistent with the public interest or when such goods are not reasonably available in sufficient quantities. The broad latitude for deciding on these exceptions could potentially lead to increased project costs and favoritism in vendor selection, impacting fair competition and economic outcomes.
Furthermore, Section 9 specifies that financial assistance eligibility criteria should prioritize projects contributing to economic growth, job creation, and national significance. However, the criteria's broad and sometimes vague nature could invite subjective interpretations, resulting in biases during the project selection process. This ambiguity could lead to financial allocations that do not necessarily align with the bill’s intended goals of stimulating economically significant infrastructure development.
Lastly, concerns about transparency and accountability are heightened by the financial reporting requirements stated in Section 12. Despite mandates for annual audits and reports on financial transactions, the lack of specific enforcement mechanisms or criteria could reduce the effectiveness of these measures, potentially allowing mismanagement of financial resources without due scrutiny.
In summary, while the bill outlines substantial financial appropriations and aims to support critical infrastructure development, it poses risks regarding financial oversight, potential favoritism, and effective use of public funds. These issues underscore the need for stricter transparency and accountability measures to ensure that financial resources are utilized appropriately and for the public good.
Issues
The establishment of a National Infrastructure Development Bank (Section 3) as an 'independent establishment' lacks clarification on its operations and oversight, raising concerns about transparency and potential misuse of funds.
The broad definitions of terms like 'Development' and 'Entity' in Section 2 could lead to ambiguities and potential favoritism, influencing the allocation of resources and inclusion of projects.
Section 5 grants the Director significant unchecked powers, including the discretion to determine loan terms and indemnify directors and officers, raising concerns of potential abuse and favoritism.
Section 4 prescribes a 10-year term for the Director and Deputy Director, which could reduce accountability and adaptability to change, and potentially allow for indefinite service beyond term expiration.
The broad scope and lack of specificity in project criteria within Section 9's eligibility for financial assistance could result in subjective interpretations and potential bias in project selections.
The 'BUY AMERICA' provisions in Section 11 could increase project costs and lead to potential favoritism due to broad discretion for exceptions, affecting fair competition and economic impacts.
The lack of specific oversight mechanisms for committees, senior officers, and risk management in Sections 4, 6, and 7 raises concerns about accountability and potential conflicts of interest.
Section 13 authorizes $5 billion annually to capitalize the Bank without detailed goals or oversight mechanisms, posing risks of wasteful spending and lack of transparency.
The requirement for laborers to be paid prevailing wages under Section 10 may create inconsistencies in wage standards and incur additional costs, potentially impacting project budgets.
The absence of specific criteria or enforcement mechanisms in Section 12 for audit reports and public comments could limit transparency and diminish the effectiveness of accountability measures.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the "National Infrastructure Development Bank Act of 2023" introduces the Act by giving it a short title and outlines its table of contents, which lists the main parts of the Act, including the creation of a National Infrastructure Development Bank, the roles of its leaders, committees for managing risks and audits, and specific laws and reports connected to the Bank.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The definitions section outlines key terms used in the bill, including the types of infrastructure projects covered, financial and legal entities involved, and specifics about disadvantaged communities. It also defines relevant concepts like public-private partnerships, smart grids, greenhouse gases, and the role of the Secretary of the Treasury.
3. Establishment of National Infrastructure Development Bank Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The National Infrastructure Development Bank is created as an independent agency of the Federal Government. The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for helping to set up the bank.
4. Director; Deputy Director Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the roles of the Director and Deputy Director of the Bank, stating they are appointed by the President with Senate approval for ten-year terms. It explains the procedures for filling vacancies, conditions for reappointment, and restrictions on their involvement with projects they have an interest in. The Director is responsible for setting up committees, developing the Bank's bylaws, and ensuring the Bank's operations align with the Act by reviewing various plans and reports.
5. Powers and limitations of the Director Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the Bank has the authority to evaluate and fund infrastructure projects, offer loans and guarantees, make agreements, oversee projects, represent the Bank's interests, and handle related legal matters, while coordinating with state and local regulations without overriding them.
6. Senior officers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the roles and responsibilities of the senior officers of the Bank, including their appointment, qualifications, duties, and limitations. It also describes procedures for filling vacancies, determining compensation, and imposes restrictions on their external interests to prevent conflicts of interest.
7. Risk management committee Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The risk management committee is established by the Director of the Bank and includes five members led by a chief risk officer (CRO). The committee is responsible for creating and monitoring risk management policies, and the Director has the power to appoint and remove the CRO and other officers, all of whom serve six-year terms and must have relevant experience. The officers cannot hold other public offices or have financial interests in the Bank's projects.
8. Audit committee; compliance office Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment of a compliance office and an audit committee in a Bank, detailing the roles and responsibilities of the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) and other audit officers. It includes their appointment process, duties, qualifications, compensation, and constraints, such as not holding other public offices or having conflicts of interest with certain financial entities or projects.
9. Eligibility criteria for assistance from Bank Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the criteria and process for infrastructure projects to qualify for financial help from the Bank, emphasizing public benefit, private investment, and regional significance. It also describes the role of the Director and senior officers in setting and revising eligibility criteria, seeking public input, and ensuring projects meet specific criteria related to their type, such as transportation or energy, while not bypassing state and local permit obligations.
10. Status and applicability of certain Federal laws Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that workers on government-funded infrastructure projects must be paid wages at least equal to local standards, with oversight by the Secretary of Labor, and states that the U.S. will not have priority claims over debts of the funding bank. Additionally, recipients of financial help for public transport projects must follow specific grant rules.
11. Domestic content statutes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under the U.S. Department of Transportation’s jurisdiction, infrastructure project financing must comply with certain laws, and for projects not covered under these, all materials like iron and steel must be made in the U.S. unless exceptions apply, such as public interest conflicts, insufficient domestic supply, or if costs rise by over 25%. Additionally, waivers must be justified publicly, and actions should align with international agreements, with consultations among relevant officials allowed.
12. Audits; reports to President and Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the procedures for auditing and reporting on the Bank's activities. It requires the Bank's accounting to follow standard principles and undergo annual independent audits, mandates the Director to report yearly summaries and project updates to the President and Congress, and calls for a five-year evaluation by the GAO. Additionally, the Bank must keep detailed and accessible financial records, with public comment opportunities on project agreements, and allow inspection by the Secretary and GAO.
13. Authorization of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes a budget of $5 billion for each year from 2027 to 2031 to fund the Bank, and this money will be available until it is fully spent.
Money References
- There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031 to capitalize the Bank and to remain available until expended.