Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a tax credit to incentivize the purchase of American agricultural commodities.

ELI5 AI

The "Grown in America Act of 2024" is like giving companies a reward for buying food and farm stuff that's grown in America, making it cheaper for them if they support local farmers, but there are some rules and limits on how much reward they can get.

Summary AI

H.R. 10494, known as the "Grown in America Act of 2024," aims to change the Internal Revenue Code to give a tax credit to encourage the purchase of American agricultural products. This credit allows businesses to deduct a portion of their costs for buying agricultural goods produced in the U.S., making it financially beneficial to support local farmers. The bill specifies which types of agricultural commodities qualify and sets conditions for eligibility, including a requirement that a significant percentage of the agricultural inputs must be domestically sourced for businesses to receive the full credit. It also includes provisions for cooperative organizations to distribute the credit among their members.

Published

2024-12-18
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-12-18
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10494ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
2,257
Pages:
12
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 580
Verbs: 149
Adjectives: 173
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 89
Entities: 138

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.98
Average Sentence Length:
66.38
Token Entropy:
4.89
Readability (ARI):
33.74

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, titled the "Grown in America Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code by introducing a new tax credit aimed at encouraging the purchase of American agricultural commodities. This tax credit, referred to as the "Domestically Produced Agriculture Credit," is designed to offer financial incentives to taxpayers who invest in agricultural inputs produced within the United States. The credit is calculated based on the domestic agricultural input costs and is capped at $100 million per taxable year. The bill also outlines specific eligibility criteria, the method for determining credit amounts, and provisions for cooperative organizations to share credits with their members.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key issue present in the bill is the cap of $100 million on the agriculture credit, which might limit incentives for larger agricultural enterprises or cooperatives that may otherwise benefit from such investments. Additionally, new businesses or those in the initial growth phase could face challenges due to the requirement of a 3-year average for determining credit eligibility, potentially putting them at a disadvantage. There are also concerns that the intricate and complex language used in defining terms such as "applicable percentage" and "domestic agricultural input costs" may make it difficult for potential beneficiaries to determine their eligibility and understand the process.

The bill's emphasis on domestic agricultural commodities has raised apprehensions about protectionism, which might result in trade tensions with other countries who export these commodities to the United States. Moreover, the aggregation rule and other special provisions might present additional complexity, particularly for small businesses or cooperatives without legal expertise. Lastly, the future issuance of regulations and guidance from the Secretary of Agriculture suggests uncertainty, as these future changes could affect the long-term strategic planning of businesses wishing to utilize the tax credit.

Impact on the Public

The bill stands to impact the public by encouraging the purchase of domestically produced agricultural goods, potentially strengthening the agricultural sector within the United States. This could yield economic benefits such as increased employment opportunities and growth in local farming industries. However, if the bill is perceived as protectionist, it might negatively affect international trade relations, potentially leading to higher costs for consumers if foreign agricultural commodities become more expensive due to strained trade relationships.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts:

  • Domestic Farmers and Producers: The bill benefits American farmers by incentivizing buyers to choose local products, potentially boosting the market for their goods and enhancing their profits.

  • Cooperative Organizations: These organizations might find a new avenue for financial distribution through the apportionment of credits amongst their patrons, which could strengthen cooperative efforts and stability.

Negative Impacts:

  • Large Agricultural Enterprises: The $100 million cap may limit these enterprises' ability to capitalize on available credits fully, potentially restraining their growth and operational expansion.

  • New and Growing Businesses: The 3-year eligibility requirement might inhibit newer businesses from accessing the credit, potentially slowing their entry into competitive markets.

  • International Trade Partners: Countries that export agricultural goods to the U.S. might view this bill unfavorably, interpreting it as a move toward protectionism, which could affect trade relationships and agreements.

In conclusion, while the "Grown in America Act of 2024" promises benefits for domestic agricultural sectors, it also presents challenges that must be addressed to prevent negative ramifications on both local and international levels. Adjustments in execution and clarity in regulations could enhance its reach and effectiveness.

Financial Assessment

The "Grown in America Act of 2024" (H.R. 10494) is a piece of proposed legislation aimed at amending the Internal Revenue Code to establish a tax credit that incentivizes the purchase of American agricultural commodities. The central financial component of this bill revolves around the introduction of the domestically produced agriculture credit, which permits businesses to deduct a part of their costs for purchasing U.S.-produced agricultural commodities. Here's a closer examination of how financial elements are treated within the bill and how they tie into identified issues:

Financial Allocations and Limits

The bill specifies that the agriculture credit for any taxable year is capped at an amount equal to the lesser of 25% of a taxpayer's total agricultural input costs, multiplied by an applicable percentage or $100,000,000. This financial cap aims to control the maximum benefit a taxpayer might receive under the credit system. The intention here is to encourage the purchase of American agricultural products by providing a financial incentive.

However, setting a cap at $100,000,000 could limit incentives for larger agricultural enterprises or cooperatives. By imposing this cap, the legislation aims to prevent excessive tax benefits from flowing disproportionately to larger entities; nonetheless, it may inadvertently restrict the full utilization of potential funds for larger scale agricultural enterprises that could use this credit for expansion or to enhance efficiencies, thereby potentially undermining the bill's overall economic impact.

Eligibility and Complexity

Eligibility for this credit requires that businesses demonstrate a 3-year average applicable percentage of domestic agricultural inputs. This means that the domestic agricultural input costs must make up a certain percentage of a taxpayer’s total input costs to qualify for the full credit. While this condition seeks to ensure that only those businesses genuinely committed to sourcing domestically benefit, it can pose challenges, particularly for newer businesses or those in a growth phase lacking the required historical data. Such constraints could impact fairness and reduce competitiveness in the sector.

Additionally, the bill's language around the credit and its limitations is complex. It includes precise formulas and various thresholds that businesses must meet, which could pose clarity challenges. Small businesses and cooperatives, in particular, may find navigating these provisions without legal or financial expertise burdensome, potentially reducing their ability to utilize the credit effectively.

Regulatory Guidance and Transparency

The Secretary of Agriculture is tasked with maintaining a list of domestically unavailable agricultural commodities, which is crucial for determining which purchases won't count against a taxpayer’s domestic input statistics. The reliance on future regulations and guidance leaves space for interpretation, potentially affecting how businesses plan long-term strategies. Lack of transparency surrounding how this list is determined could raise issues of perceived bias or unwelcome administrative influence.

In conclusion, while the financial incentives within the "Grown in America Act of 2024" are designed to bolster domestic agricultural production, several elements related to monetary references may introduce complexity or limit the effectiveness of the bill. Key among these are the fixed cap on the available credit, challenges in establishing long-term eligibility, and potential for regulatory uncertainty. These factors require careful consideration to ensure the bill achieves its goals without disadvantaging certain business segments or causing unintended economic impacts.

Issues

  • The mechanism to set a cap of $100,000,000 for the agriculture credit (Sections 2 and 45BB) might inadvertently limit the incentives for large agricultural enterprises or cooperatives, potentially leading to underutilization of potential funds for expansion or efficiency improvements.

  • The 3-year average applicable percentage requirement for credit eligibility (Section 45BB(c)) might disadvantage newer businesses or those in a growth phase that lack sufficient historical data, potentially leading to fairness and competitiveness concerns.

  • The bill's focus on domestic agricultural commodities (Sections 2 and 45BB), while attempting to boost local production, could be perceived as protectionist. This approach might lead to trade tensions, especially if large imports are necessary due to climatic or geographical limitations.

  • The intricate language in defining applicability and limitations, particularly in subsections (b) and (c) of Section 45BB, could make it challenging for taxpayers to clearly understand their eligibility or compliance, raising concerns about clarity and accessibility.

  • The special rules and aggregation provisions under subsections (d) and (e) of Section 45BB might be overly complex, making them difficult for small businesses or cooperatives without legal expertise to navigate, potentially impacting their ability to benefit from the tax credit.

  • There is potential uncertainty introduced by the regulation and guidance clause under subsection (f) of Section 45BB, suggesting future changes or interpretations could affect taxpayers planning their long-term strategies.

  • The list to be established by the Secretary of Agriculture regarding domestically unavailable commodities (Section 2(c)) may lack transparency in its criteria or process, potentially leading to disputes or perceptions of bias.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states its title, which is “Grown in America Act of 2024”.

2. Domestically produced agriculture credit Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, a new tax credit called the "Domestically Produced Agriculture Credit" is introduced, allowing taxpayers to receive a credit based on their domestic agricultural input costs, with specific rules about how the credit is calculated, eligibility requirements, and how it can be apportioned among cooperative organizations. The section also defines key terms, sets limitations, and outlines effective dates and administrative details for implementing the credit.

Money References

  • “(a) In general.—For purposes of section 38, the domestically produced agriculture credit determined under this section for any taxable year is an amount equal to the lesser of— “(1)(A) the product of— “(B) 25 percent of the total agricultural input costs of such taxpayer with respect to such taxable year, multiplied by “(C) the applicable percentage of the taxpayer for the taxable year, or “(2) $100,000,000.
  • “(f) Regulations.—The Secretary may prescribe such regulations and other guidance as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out this section.”. (b) Credit allowed as part of general business credit.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 38(b) of such Code is amended by striking “plus” at the end of paragraph (32), by striking the period at the end of paragraph (33) and inserting “, plus”, and by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(34) the domestically produced agriculture credit determined under section 45U(a).”. (2) LIMITATIONS.—Section 38(c) of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(7) SPECIAL RULES FOR DOMESTICALLY PRODUCED AGRICULTURE CREDIT.—In the case of the portion of the credit determined under subsection (a) which is attributable to the domestically produced agriculture credit determined under section 45BB— “(A) this section and section 39 shall be applied separately with respect to such credit, “(B) in applying paragraph (1) to such credit— “(i) for purposes of subparagraph (A) thereof, the tentative minimum tax shall be treated as being zero, “(ii) for purposes of subparagraph (B) thereof, such subparagraph shall be applied— “(I) by substituting ‘50 percent’ for ‘25 percent’, and “(II) by substituting ‘$0’ for ‘$25,000’, and “(iii) the limitation under paragraph (1) (as modified by clause (ii)) shall be reduced by the credit allowed under subsection (a) for the taxable year (other than the domestically produced agriculture credit), and “(C) with respect to the application of section 39, subsection (a) of such section shall be applied— “(i) in paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(B) thereof, by substituting ‘10 taxable years’ for ‘20 taxable years’ each place it appears, and “(ii) in paragraph (2)(A), by substituting ‘11 taxable years’ for ‘21 taxable years’.”. (c) Domestically unavailable agricultural commodities.—For purposes of section 45BB of such Code, the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish and maintain a list that identifies, with respect to each calendar year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act, the agricultural commodities (as defined in subsection (b)(2) of such section) that cannot feasibly be produced, grown, or raised domestically during such calendar year.

45BB. Domestically produced agriculture credit Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a tax credit for taxpayers based on their costs for domestically produced agricultural inputs. The credit is determined by calculating 25% of these costs and applying an "applicable percentage" which reflects how much of their inputs are domestic versus total agricultural inputs, with a maximum limit of $100,000,000. It also outlines definitions, eligibility criteria, and rules for cooperative organizations sharing the credit with participating patrons.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—For purposes of section 38, the domestically produced agriculture credit determined under this section for any taxable year is an amount equal to the lesser of— (1)(A) the product of— (B) 25 percent of the total agricultural input costs of such taxpayer with respect to such taxable year, multiplied by (C) the applicable percentage of the taxpayer for the taxable year, or (2) $100,000,000.