Overview
Title
To amend the Act of August 9, 1955 (commonly known as the Long-Term Leasing Act), to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a new rule that allows two Native American tribes to rent out their land for a really long time, up to 99 years, so they can do things like build or start businesses on it.
Summary AI
H.R. 10492 aims to amend the Long-Term Leasing Act from 1955 to allow the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) to lease land held in trust for up to 99 years. This change allows these Tribes to have long-term leases similar to those available to other tribes. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "H. R. 10492" seeks to amend the "Long-Term Leasing Act" of 1955 to allow the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) to lease their lands for periods of up to 99 years. Currently, the act allows certain tribes to lease their lands, and this bill adds these two specific tribes to that list. The goal is to provide these tribes with greater flexibility and opportunities for long-term planning and development on their lands.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue raised by this bill is the potential perception of favoritism or preferential treatment towards the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). By specifically including these tribes, there may be concerns from other tribes about why they are not receiving similar leasing terms. The amendment's rationale for singling out these tribes is not explicitly clear, which might lead to questions about fairness and equality among different tribes and reservations.
Another issue concerns the financial implications of allowing these longer leases. While longer lease terms can potentially attract more significant investment and economic development, the lack of clarity regarding financial impacts raises concerns about possible wasteful spending or economic imbalances. Stakeholders may wonder how the changes will affect both the tribes and their surrounding communities economically.
Furthermore, the language of the amendment is quite technical, referencing earlier statutes that might not be easily understood by people unfamiliar with the "Long-Term Leasing Act." This could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations, particularly among the general public and those not versed in legalistic language.
Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, this bill could positively impact the public by fostering economic development and stability for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). By granting these tribes the ability to enter into long-term leases, the legislation may help them attract businesses, create jobs, and stimulate local economies. This could lead to improved infrastructure and increased economic activities not just beneficial for the tribes, but for neighboring communities as well.
On the flip side, the potential for perceived preferential treatment may trigger political or legal challenges. Other tribes may seek similar leasing privileges, leading to a broader discussion about equity in legislative amendments concerning tribal lands. This could open up debates about whether this bill sets a precedent and what that might mean for future legislation affecting other tribes' leasing rights.
Specific stakeholders, particularly those within the referenced tribes, stand to benefit from increased control over their lands and potential economic gains. However, they may also face scrutiny or opposition from other tribal entities that do not receive the same benefits. This bill's success depends heavily on whether it can balance economic development with fair treatment of all tribes involved.
Issues
The bill amends the 'Long-Term Leasing Act' to favor the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) by authorizing leases of up to 99 years for their lands. This could be perceived as preferential treatment unless there is a clear justification, potentially leading to political or legal challenges. (Section 1)
The bill could have significant financial implications through changes in leasing terms for the specified tribes' lands, but the lack of clarity on the financial impacts could lead to potential wasteful spending or economic imbalances. (Section 1)
The amendment references previous statutes heavily, making it potentially inaccessible to those who are not familiar with the Long-Term Leasing Act. This lack of clarity in language could pose legal interpretation issues or reduce public understanding. (Section 1)
The amendment lacks sufficient contextual explanation as to why these particular tribes are being granted these specific lease terms, leading to potential questions about why they're being singled out and whether this sets a precedent for future legislative actions regarding other tribes or reservations. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe and Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) leasing authority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Long-Term Leasing Act to include the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation and the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) Reservation, allowing these tribes to lease their lands more easily.