Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal land in Arizona to La Paz County, Arizona, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the U.S. government to give some land in Arizona to a place called La Paz County so they can use it for making solar power and creating jobs. The County has to pay for the land and make sure they don't harm any important things like special artifacts that might be on it.
Summary AI
H.R. 1043 proposes that the U.S. Secretary of the Interior should transfer certain federally managed lands in Arizona to La Paz County. These lands encompass roughly 3,400 acres and are intended to support solar energy development and job creation. The transfer requires the County to pay the fair market value and cover all associated costs, while also protecting any significant cultural or environmental resources. Additionally, the bill includes measures to safeguard Tribal artifacts found on the land.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, officially titled the "La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act," proposes transferring approximately 3,400 acres of federal land, managed by the Bureau of Land Management, to La Paz County in Arizona. The aim of the transfer is to allow the County to utilize this land, potentially for solar energy development and job creation. The land must be sold at fair market value, with the proceeds directed into a Federal Land Disposal Account. The bill outlines certain conditions and restrictions regarding the transfer to ensure protection of cultural and environmental resources while delineating responsibilities related to costs and legal compliance.
Summary of Significant Issues
Vague Timeline: The legislation uses the phrase "as soon as practicable" when referring to the timeline for land conveyance, leaving room for indefinite delays and potential frustration for La Paz County if the process does not progress expediently.
Subjectivity in Resource Protection: The exclusion clause for land containing "significant" resources is inherently subjective, which might lead to disputes about what qualifies as significant, potentially delaying or complicating the transfer process.
Appraisal Disputes: The bill talks about using an appraisal to determine fair market value but does not provide a mechanism for resolving disputes over this appraisal. This could be problematic if disagreements arise over the valuation of the land.
Ambiguous Terms: Words like "good faith efforts" and "minimize impacts" regarding the protection of Tribal artifacts are open to interpretation, which could result in inconsistencies and potential conflicts with Tribal groups.
Economic and Legal Uncertainties: The bill's withdrawal of land from mining and mineral leasing operations does not clarify potential impacts on existing leases or economic stakeholders, which could lead to unforeseen legal or financial issues.
Financial Burden: By placing all costs related to the conveyance on La Paz County, there is a risk of imposing a financial strain on the County, potentially affecting its economic stability and ability to effectively utilize the lands for development.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
General Public: Ideally, the bill could promote the development of solar energy projects in Arizona, contributing to renewable energy goals and potentially creating new jobs, benefiting both local communities and broader environmental efforts. However, if the issues in the bill are not resolved, expected public benefits could be delayed.
La Paz County: La Paz County stands to gain significant economic opportunities from gaining ownership of these lands, especially if solar energy projects are developed successfully. However, the financial and administrative burdens imposed by the bill should not be underestimated, as they could pose challenges for a smaller jurisdiction with limited resources.
Tribal Communities: For Tribal stakeholders, the protection of cultural artifacts is of utmost importance. Any perceived failure to adhere to protection measures could harm relationships with Tribal authorities like the Colorado River Indian Tribes and lead to legal objections.
Federal Agencies and Legal Bodies: Federal agencies, particularly the Bureau of Land Management, must ensure an orderly, fair, and transparent transfer process. Legal bodies might have to mediate disputes arising from subjective terms and financial assessments, potentially leading to prolonged legal processes.
Efforts to mitigate these issues with clearer legislative language and mechanisms for dispute resolution would strengthen the bill's implementation, increasing its chances of achieving the intended objectives without unintended negative consequences.
Issues
The phrase 'as soon as practicable' in Section 3(a) is vague and could result in indefinite delays in the conveyance process, lacking a specific timeline or deadline.
The provision in Section 3(b)(2) to exclude land with 'significant' resources might lead to disputes due to its subjective nature, creating potential legal challenges over what qualifies as 'significant'.
The process for disputing the appraisal of the land's fair market value in Section 3(c) is not detailed, which could result in financial disagreements and has implications on the perceived fairness of the transaction.
In Section 3(f), the withdrawal of Federal land from mining and mineral leasing operations lacks clarity on the consequences for existing leases or stakeholders, potentially creating economic or legal uncertainties.
The requirement in Section 3(g) that La Paz County is responsible for all conveyance-related costs may impose a financial burden on the County, impacting its economic stability or ability to utilize the land effectively.
Terms like 'good faith efforts' and 'minimize impacts' in Section 3(d) related to the protection of Tribal artifacts are ambiguous and open to interpretation, which may lead to inconsistent application and disputes with Tribal stakeholders.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill states that it can be officially called the "La Paz County Solar Energy and Job Creation Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several terms used in the Act: "County" refers to La Paz County in Arizona, "Federal land" describes about 3,400 acres managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and "map" refers to a specific map titled “BLM Arizona—La Paz County Land Conveyance Map” dated June 29, 2023.
3. Conveyance to La Paz County, Arizona Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill requires the Secretary to transfer certain federal lands to La Paz County, Arizona, at the land's fair market value, while excluding areas with significant resources like cultural or environmental importance. Throughout the process, the County must respect tribal artifacts, and it is responsible for paying the conveyance costs and resulting needed appraisals, with the sale proceeds going into a Federal Land Disposal Account for uses aligned with the Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act.