Overview
Title
To impose restrictions on Federal agencies with respect to appointments, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10412 wants to make sure that for one year, most federal offices can't hire more people or increase their salaries. It also asks these offices to have a little fewer people working there in three years.
Summary AI
H.R. 10412, known as the "Federal Freeze Act," seeks to limit the hiring and salary increases at federal agencies. For one year following the enactment, agencies cannot employ more people than they currently have unless it's necessary for law enforcement, public safety, or national security. Additionally, agency employees' base salaries cannot be raised during this time. The bill also requires each agency to gradually reduce their workforce to be 5% less than current levels within three years.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, numbered H.R. 10412 and titled the "Federal Freeze Act," aims to impose restrictions on federal agencies regarding hiring and salary adjustments. It mandates a one-year freeze on increasing the number of federal employees and their annual salary rates, except under specific circumstances. The allowances for increased hiring are limited to scenarios critical to law enforcement, public safety, or national security. Furthermore, the bill outlines a systematic reduction in federal workforce numbers by setting targets for a 2% decrease in employees in two years and a 5% decrease in three years from the baseline number at the time of the Act's enactment.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several notable issues arise from this proposed bill. Firstly, the term "baseline number" lacks a standardized definition or method for determining the number of employees, which may result in inconsistent application across various agencies. This ambiguity is particularly concerning for agencies with variable staffing or part-time positions.
Furthermore, the bill includes provisions allowing agency heads to appoint additional employees under broadly defined conditions tied to law enforcement, safety, or national security. The broad language here could potentially lead to misuse, as there is no detailed process or oversight to ensure these criteria are met.
Additionally, the hiring and salary freeze lacks flexibility to address unforeseen emergencies or evolving needs that do not fall under the exceptions provided. This could inhibit agencies' ability to effectively respond to unexpected challenges.
Lastly, the mandate to reduce the workforce by specified percentages could negatively impact agency operations. Without strategic guidance or consideration of specific agency functions, these reductions might lead to inefficiencies or reduced quality in public services.
Potential Impacts on the Public
Broadly, the bill could have mixed effects on the public. On the one hand, the intention to control and potentially reduce federal spending by limiting workforce growth and salary increases might appeal to those concerned with government efficiency and budgetary restraint. On the other hand, these staffing constraints could hinder agencies’ ability to deliver public services effectively, particularly if the mandated workforce reductions impact frontline services essential to citizens.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Federal employees are directly affected by this bill as it freezes salaries and potentially jeopardizes job security due to the proposed workforce reduction. For agencies, the imposition of strict hiring limits and requirements for reducing workforce numbers could challenge their ability to fulfill their missions effectively. Specifically, agencies with already strained resources may struggle to maintain operational efficiency or adapt to emergent challenges.
Additionally, the public at large might experience indirect effects. An increase in wait times for services, reduced program availability, or lower quality of public services could result if agencies are unable to operate effectively under the imposed restrictions. Conversely, for taxpayers focused on governmental cost management, the act could be seen as a positive measure toward fiscal responsibility.
Overall, while the Federal Freeze Act aims to curb federal spending by impacting workforce management, the lack of flexibility and clear guidelines within the bill could pose significant challenges for federal agencies and, consequently, the general public.
Issues
The definition of 'baseline number' in Section 2(a)(2) is ambiguous without a standardized method for determining the number of employees, which could lead to inconsistencies across agencies, especially those with fluctuating staff sizes or numerous part-time positions.
The exception in Section 2(b)(1)(B) allowing agency heads to appoint individuals if it 'serves the interest of law enforcement, public safety, or the national security of the United States' is vague, allowing for broad interpretation and potential misuse, as it does not provide specific criteria or a review process for these appointments.
The hiring and salary freeze in Section 2(b) provides no mechanisms for addressing unforeseen circumstances or emergencies, which could hinder agencies' abilities to respond effectively to sudden needs or crises not related to law enforcement, public safety, or national security.
The reduction in force outlined in Section 2(c) is mandated without consideration of potential negative impacts on agency operations and lacks guidance on how to strategically implement these reductions, which could lead to operational inefficiencies or decreased public service quality.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this bill declares that it can be referred to as the "Federal Freeze Act."
2. Freeze on Federal hiring and salaries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a temporary freeze on federal hiring and salary increases. It specifies that, for one year after the Act's enactment, agencies cannot increase employee numbers beyond a baseline, unless it's necessary for law enforcement, public safety, or national security, and no salary increases are allowed. Furthermore, agencies must reduce employees by 2% in two years and by 5% in three years.