Overview
Title
To prohibit the continuing availability of any portion of a Federal payment to the District of Columbia for a program of District of Columbia resident tuition support for a fiscal year which remains unobligated as of the end of the fiscal year, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The No More D.C. Waste Act wants to make sure that if money given to help students from Washington, D.C. go to college isn't used by the end of the year, it can't be saved for the next year. It also asks for a report on how the money was spent, starting from 2026.
Summary AI
The No More D.C. Waste Act aims to stop federal payments for the District of Columbia's resident tuition support program from being carried over to the next fiscal year if they remain unused by the end of the current year. Specifically, any leftover funds must lapse and will not be available after the fiscal year ends. The bill also requires the Chief Financial Officer of D.C. to report to Congress annually on how the funds were used, including details such as the number of student payments, average financial assistance per payment, and any remaining unobligated amounts. The bill will start applying to funds from the fiscal year 2026 onwards.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "No More D.C. Waste Act," is designed to manage federal payments made to the District of Columbia (D.C.) for its resident tuition support program more strictly. Specifically, the bill prohibits the continued availability of any portion of these federal funds that remain unspent by the end of the fiscal year. These funds will expire at the end of the fiscal year instead of being allowed to carry over for future use. The changes will take effect starting in the fiscal year 2026. Additionally, the bill mandates an annual report detailing how these funds are used, focusing on metrics such as the number of students receiving assistance and the amounts involved.
Significant Issues
One critical issue with the bill is that requiring unobligated funds to lapse at the end of the fiscal year may result in agencies rushing to spend these funds unnecessarily to avoid losing them. This can lead to inefficient and hurried spending decisions, potentially resulting in fiscal mismanagement. Moreover, by removing the provision allowing funds to be available until expended, the bill could disrupt long-term planning efforts for educational programs in D.C., as administrators might face sudden financial shortfalls.
Furthermore, there is a lack of explicit guidance on how to handle unobligated funds, which introduces uncertainty regarding the effects on students relying on these programs. The absence of specific evaluation criteria for the tuition support program may also lead to ambiguous assessments in annual reports, making it challenging to determine the program's success or areas for improvement.
Impact on the Public
The broader impact of the bill on the public will likely involve both positive and negative effects. Positively, the bill intends to increase accountability and reduce waste in federal funding allocations, which is beneficial for taxpayers and public trust. It aims to ensure that funds are used efficiently and effectively within the intended fiscal year.
However, negatively, the pressure to spend funds before the fiscal year ends may not always result in the most strategic or useful application of resources. In particular, students in D.C. counting on continued educational funding may be adversely affected if funds lapse, leading to reduced support or program disruptions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational Institutions and Students: Educational institutions might face challenges in managing budgets if they can't rely on unused funds being available in subsequent years. This could affect program stability, potentially impacting students who depend on consistent financial aid to plan their educational pursuits effectively.
D.C. Government and Administrators: For D.C. officials and administrators, the bill introduces constraints that may complicate budgetary planning and execution. They will need to balance the benefit of enhanced fiscal accountability with potential administrative burdens associated with adjusting to the new financial restrictions.
Taxpayers and Oversight Entities: The bill could benefit taxpayers by aiming to minimize wasteful expenditures, ensuring that federal funds are used as efficiently as possible. Oversight entities and Congress may also find the structured annual reporting requirement useful for tracking and evaluating the use of taxpayer funds.
In conclusion, while the bill proposes structural changes to improve fiscal responsibility, careful consideration and strategic planning will be necessary to address potential inefficiencies and ensure that the needs of residents—especially students relying on tuition support—are met effectively.
Issues
The requirement in Section 2 for unobligated funds to lapse at the end of the fiscal year may lead to wasteful end-of-year spending as agencies might rush to obligate funds before they lapse, impacting budget efficiency and potentially leading to fiscal mismanagement.
Section 2's repeal of the 'availability of funds until expended' provision could hinder long-term budgetary planning for educational programs under the District of Columbia College Access Act, both for public and private school programs, affecting program stability and student planning.
Section 2 lacks clarity on the consequences if unobligated funds lapse, introducing ambiguity about the potential impact on beneficiaries of the resident tuition support program, which could lead to a lack of trust in the program's reliability.
In Section 3, the absence of specific guidelines on how unobligated balances should be managed or reassigned may result in inefficiencies and potential misuse of funds, affecting the overall efficacy of the tuition support program.
The language in Section 3 does not specify the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the resident tuition support program, potentially leading to ambiguous assessments in annual reports which hinder accountability and improvement efforts.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act indicates that its official short title is the “No More D.C. Waste Act”.
2. Prohibition on continuing availability of unobligated funds appropriated for District of Columbia resident tuition support Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits any unused federal funds given to the District of Columbia for resident tuition support from being available after the fiscal year ends; instead, these funds will lapse. It also changes the rules for the District of Columbia College Access program to ensure that funds do not remain available after being unspent, starting from the fiscal year 2026 onwards.
3. Annual report on use of payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Chief Financial Officer of the District of Columbia to submit an annual report to Congress about how federal payments for resident tuition support are used. The report must include details on the number of student payments, average financial assistance per payment, any unspent money by the year's end, and remaining funds from previous years.