Overview

Title

To improve the emergency management capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill is about helping the Department of Veterans Affairs get better at handling emergencies by making sure they have special radios that work even when other systems fail and making sure they have enough emergency supplies.

Summary AI

H.R. 10369, also known as the "Advancing VA’s Emergency Response to Crises Act of 2024," aims to enhance the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) emergency management capabilities. The bill requires the VA to establish a high-frequency emergency communications system in its medical facilities within two years to maintain communication during disasters without external infrastructure. It also mandates various reports, including on emergency management roles and fuel sharing with FEMA, while requiring an audit on the system's effectiveness and staffing by the VA's Inspector General. Additionally, the bill seeks improvements to the VA's emergency cache program and its Regional Readiness Centers.

Published

2024-12-11
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-12-11
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10369ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
3,550
Pages:
20
Sentences:
86

Language

Nouns: 1,141
Verbs: 273
Adjectives: 149
Adverbs: 34
Numbers: 89
Entities: 237

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.67
Average Sentence Length:
41.28
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
24.84

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The "Advancing VA’s Emergency Response to Crises Act of 2024" (H.R. 10369) aims to enhance the emergency management capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The bill primarily focuses on establishing a high-frequency emergency communications system across VA medical facilities to ensure reliable communications during disasters, thereby maintaining healthcare services for veterans. It mandates collaborative efforts with other agencies, comprehensive staff training, and periodic testing to ensure system effectiveness. Additionally, the bill addresses roles and responsibilities in emergency management, evaluates readiness centers, improves the emergency cache program, and considers resource-sharing coordination with FEMA.

Significant Issues

Several concerns are raised about the bill’s provisions:

  1. Implementation and Oversight: The absence of a contingency plan for the phased implementation of the emergency communications system poses a risk to preparedness. Additionally, the spending plan for this system lacks detailed oversight, raising concerns about potential financial mismanagement.

  2. Procurement and Contracting: The provision allowing the VA Secretary to solicit new contracts for emergency communications opens the door to potential favoritism and lack of competition, which could lead to ethical and financial issues.

  3. Regular Testing and Readiness: The requirement for internal exercises to test the communication system "not less frequently than once per year" might be insufficient, possibly compromising staff readiness during actual emergencies.

  4. Emergency Cache Program: Vagueness in definitions and guidelines, such as "authorized access" and criteria for "activation of the cache," could lead to misuse or inconsistent application of resources.

  5. Coordination with FEMA: The plan to increase coordination for resource sharing with FEMA lacks specificity, and the report requirement could delay necessary actions, potentially affecting emergency response efficiency.

  6. Unexpected Cost Implications: The lack of clarity about budgetary impact and funding sources in sections concerning resource sharing may result in cost overruns.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The bill has the potential to positively impact veterans by improving the reliability of emergency services in VA facilities, thereby ensuring continuous healthcare access during crises. However, if the issues identified are not addressed, there could be negative consequences for various stakeholders:

  • Veterans: A lack of readiness or inefficiencies in system implementation and operations could compromise the health and safety of veterans.
  • VA Employees: Insufficient training and readiness exercises might lead to inadequate emergency responses, putting unnecessary pressure on staff and exposing them to criticism.
  • Taxpayers: Without clear budget oversight and accountability, the implementation of the bill’s requirements might lead to financial waste, burdening taxpayers with the cost of inefficiencies.
  • Contracting Entities: The discretion given to the VA Secretary in contract solicitation could affect fairness and competitiveness in procurement processes.

Overall, while the bill addresses critical areas in improving emergency response capabilities for veteran services, the highlighted issues necessitate careful consideration to ensure the intended benefits are realized without unintended negative outcomes. Proper oversight, clear guidelines, and stakeholder collaboration are crucial to its success.

Issues

  • The section on the emergency communications system does not provide a contingency plan if issues arise during the testing phase, risking failures in emergency preparedness. (Section 2)

  • The provision allowing the Secretary to solicit new contracts for the emergency communications system could lead to favoritism or lack of competitiveness, raising ethical and financial concerns. (Section 2)

  • The requirement of internal exercises for the emergency system 'not less frequently than once per year' may be insufficient for ensuring staff readiness, potentially compromising emergency responses. (Section 2)

  • The spending plan for the emergency communications system lacks details on oversight or budget checks, which could lead to financial mismanagement or cost overruns. (Section 2)

  • The definition and guidelines for 'authorized access' and criteria for 'activation of the cache' are vague, potentially leading to misuse or inconsistent use of emergency communications or resources. (Section 5)

  • The lack of budgetary impact or funding sources for the fuel sharing plan between FEMA and the Department of Veterans Affairs could lead to cost overruns or financial mismanagement. (Section 6)

  • The OIG report requirement three years after the enactment of the bill could delay necessary improvements or corrections, which is a significant concern for accountability and efficacy. (Section 2)

  • The plan for increased coordination and fuel sharing between FEMA and the Department lacks specificity on actions required by Congress, potentially delaying crucial interagency collaboration in emergencies. (Section 6)

  • There are no specified consequences or remedies if the report on Regional Readiness Centers reveals inefficiencies, which could result in unresolved issues affecting emergency preparedness. (Section 4)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states the official name of the legislation, which can be called either the “Advancing VA’s Emergency Response to Crises Act of 2024” or simply the “AVERT Crises Act of 2024.”

2. Requirement for Department of Veterans Affairs to implement a fully operational emergency communications system throughout medical facilities of Department Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill mandates the Department of Veterans Affairs to set up a high-frequency emergency communication system across medical facilities within two years. This system is intended to maintain communication during emergencies, work with other government agencies, and ensure consistent healthcare services, including staff training and periodic testing to guarantee its effectiveness.

3. Report on emergency management roles for Department of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to Congress within 180 days detailing the roles and responsibilities of the department’s offices in emergency management. It also mandates consultations with various government bodies to improve the Department's emergency management functions and considers whether consolidating offices into a centralized emergency management office could enhance efficiency and communication.

4. Report on Regional Readiness Centers of Department of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to send a report to the Senate and House Veterans’ Affairs Committees about the Regional Readiness Centers within 180 days of the law’s enactment. This report must cover details like how many requests these centers receive, the types of materials they distribute, current and past inventory levels, costs, and how they handle emergencies, as well as any plans to change the number of centers.

5. Improvements to the emergency cache program of Department of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a plan for the Department of Veterans Affairs to enhance its emergency cache program. This includes establishing tracking systems, accountability mechanisms, and guidelines on access and distribution, as well as providing comprehensive training for employees and designating a program office for oversight within 180 days of the act's enactment.

6. Plan to allow fuel sharing and increased coordination between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Veterans Affairs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to consult with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and report to Congress within 90 days about obstacles preventing FEMA from sharing resources with the Department of Veterans Affairs during emergencies. It also asks if Congress needs to take action to allow this collaboration and if past efforts were hindered by lacking authority.