Overview
Title
To establish Federal policies and procedures to notify the next-of-kin or other emergency contact upon the death, or serious illness or serious injury, of an individual in Federal custody, to provide model policies for States, units of local government, and Indian Tribes to implement and enforce similar policies and procedures, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10367 is like a set of rules that say if someone in a government jail gets really sick, hurt, or dies, their family should be told right away, and it also wants states to follow similar rules.
Summary AI
H.R. 10367, known as the “Family Notification of Death, Injury, or Illness in Custody Act of 2024”, aims to establish procedures for notifying next-of-kin or emergency contacts in cases where individuals in federal custody face death, serious illness, or injury. It requires detention agencies, including those within the Department of Justice, to develop policies to ensure timely and compassionate notification, offer protocols for handling situations like autopsies, and provide opportunities for families to communicate with medical personnel. This bill also provides model policies for states and local governments to adopt similar procedures.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "Family Notification of Death, Injury, or Illness in Custody Act of 2024," seeks to establish federal policies to ensure that the families of individuals who die, fall seriously ill, or are seriously injured while in federal custody are notified promptly and compassionately. Moreover, the bill aims to create model policies to guide state, local government, and tribal detention agencies in implementing similar procedures. It highlights the urgent need for humane treatment and timely communication with family members about such critical events.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill mandates the development and implementation of detailed notification procedures by detention agencies. It specifies how these agencies should collect and utilize emergency contact information and sets clear timelines and standards for informing next-of-kin about deaths, serious illnesses, or injuries. The Act emphasizes the importance of compassionate and professional communication to minimize the trauma experienced by families. It also addresses the handling of the deceased's belongings and remains, requiring sensitivity and thorough documentation of all communication attempts. Furthermore, the legislation outlines the support the Department of Justice will provide to ensure compliance and effective implementation.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant issue is the incorrect reference to the "Eighteenth Amendment" in Section 2, which instead should likely refer to the "Eighth Amendment." This error could cause confusion regarding the bill’s constitutional grounding. The bill also lacks specific actionable solutions to the issues it raises, particularly the absence of national standards for notifying families when a death or significant health event occurs in custody. Additionally, the language in some parts of the bill is complex, potentially leading to misunderstandings around critical procedures, such as what can be communicated in voicemail notifications.
Moreover, the bill mandates the creation of model policies for states and local agencies, yet it does not include enforcement mechanisms or incentives, which might lead to inconsistent adoption, especially by smaller agencies that face resource constraints. The role of the Ombudsman is introduced without clear definition regarding powers or accountability processes, which could limit oversight effectiveness.
Public Impact
Broadly, the bill has the potential to enhance the humane treatment of individuals in custody by ensuring their families are promptly and compassionately informed about their situations. This could alleviate additional suffering and provide families with the information they need to seek justice or closure. However, the effectiveness of these measures could vary significantly depending on the level of compliance and resources available to each detention agency.
Impact on Stakeholders
For families of detainees, this bill might provide reassurance that they will be promptly informed should anything tragic occur. This shift could improve trust between the public and law enforcement agencies by enhancing transparency and accountability. Detention agencies, particularly smaller ones, may face challenges in implementing these new guidelines due to resource limitations. The lack of detailed plans for enforcement and support might put a strain on these organizations if not addressed adequately.
Overall, while this legislation aims to address significant concerns regarding the treatment of incarcerated individuals and the communication of critical situations to their families, greater clarity and specifics in its provisions are required to ensure effective and uniform implementation.
Issues
The reference to the Eighteenth Amendment in Section 2 is incorrect, as it pertains to the prohibition of alcohol, not the humane treatment of incarcerated people. The correct reference should likely be to the Eighth Amendment, which addresses cruel and unusual punishment.
The bill in Section 2 fails to offer specific recommendations or solutions for the issues it presents, such as a lack of national standards for notification upon death or serious illness/injury in custody. Without actionable steps, the legislation's impact may be weak or unclear, possibly leading to inaction.
In Section 4, the language in subparagraph (b)(2)(E)(i)(II) is complex and may result in confusion, especially regarding what information should or should not be conveyed in a voicemail during notifications of serious events like death or illness.
Section 4(a)(2) mandates the development of model policies for state and local agencies, but lacks enforcement mechanisms or incentives. This could lead to non-compliance from smaller, resource-strapped agencies that may struggle to adopt these policies.
Section 4(d)(4) introduces the role of an Ombudsman, who would receive and investigate complaints. However, the section does not clearly define the Ombudsman's powers or the process for accountability, which could limit the effectiveness of oversight and enforcement.
In Section 2, the bill mentions inconsistent reporting of COVID-19 deaths in custody but does not outline improvements for data collection or consistency, which may weaken efforts to address this serious issue.
The complexity of establishing a unified definition for 'detention agency' in Section 3 may lead to confusion and broad applicability that could include inappropriate organizations, affecting the efficiency and enforcement of the policy.
Section 5 lacks clarity on indirect implications for individuals designated as next-of-kin or emergency contacts. While direct legal or financial obligations are disclaimed, potential expectations or responsibilities remain ambiguous.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the official name of the act is the "Family Notification of Death, Injury, or Illness in Custody Act of 2024."
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that families of individuals who die or become severely ill in custody deserve timely and humane notification, highlighting instances where poor communication exacerbated the suffering of the deceased's relatives. The lack of national standards for notifying families about deaths or critical health situations in prisons can lead to inhumane treatment, and there is a pressing need for transparency and justice, especially with rising death rates in custody and issues such as COVID-19 impacts and delayed release of autopsy results.
3. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several terms related to detention, including "custodial record," which refers to an individual's central file while in custody, and "detention agency," which means any government body that can detain people for legal violations. It also describes what being "in the custody of a detention agency" entails and explains "taking custody" as when the agency gains control over an individual, such as during booking or transfer.
4. Emergency contact notification policies and procedures Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the implementation of emergency contact notification procedures for detention agencies, requiring them to inform designated individuals in case of a detainee’s death, serious illness, or injury within specific timeframes. It includes guidelines for the collection and modification of emergency contact information, standards for handling belongings and remains, and emphasizes compassionate communication, while also ensuring confidentiality and prohibiting coercion to provide emergency contact details.
5. Rule of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section ensures that the Act does not impose any legal or financial responsibilities on people who are named as next-of-kin or emergency contacts.