Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish a National Climate Adaptation Science Center and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers to respond to the effects of extreme weather events and climate trends, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
Imagine a big helper house where smart scientists come together to find ways to keep us safe from bad weather like super-strong storms and changes in climate. This bill wants to make one big helper house and many smaller ones around the country to share these smart ideas with everyone who needs them.
Summary AI
H.R. 10340 aims to create a National Climate Adaptation Science Center and several Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers to help address the impacts of extreme weather and long-term climate changes in the United States. The bill outlines the responsibilities of these centers, such as providing scientific guidance, collaborating with various stakeholders including states and Tribal organizations, and supporting regional research. It establishes guidelines for funding and cooperation among federal and regional entities, and calls for the creation of advisory committees to ensure the effectiveness and quality of climate adaptation efforts.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, known as the Climate Adaptation Science Centers Act, aims to establish a National Climate Adaptation Science Center along with Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers. These centers will be under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior, specifically managed by the United States Geological Survey. The primary goal is to support scientific research and collaboration to address the effects of extreme weather events and climate trends. The centers are designed to aid in adaptation efforts by providing scientific expertise, coordinating research activities, and fostering partnerships among various stakeholders, including government agencies, Indigenous Tribes, universities, and other organizations.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue is the bill's allowance for the Director of the United States Geological Survey to enter into contracts and agreements without requiring competition. This could lead to concerns about transparency and allegations of favoritism since the usual checks and balances involved in competitive bidding processes are bypassed. Additionally, the broad definition of certain entities, such as "consortium institutions," could result in confusion over eligibility for involvement and funding, potentially affecting the fair distribution of resources.
Moreover, the bill allows for exemptions from typical financial accountability standards. Specifically, the committees and working groups established under the bill are not governed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which could reduce transparency and accountability. The discretion granted to the Chief of the National Center to add or remove consortium institutions without explicit criteria is another potential area for bias or favoritism.
Impact on the Public Broadly
Broadly speaking, the public may benefit from the bill through enhanced research and understanding of climate adaptation strategies. By establishing a network of centers focused on climate adaptation science, the bill aims to improve the management of natural and cultural resources, which can lead to better-prepared communities facing climate change impacts. However, the public might also be concerned about the transparency in how the bill is implemented, particularly regarding how decisions are made and resources are allocated.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
- Government Agencies: These entities could benefit from improved coordination and the pooling of resources to address climate adaptation issues more effectively. The partnerships fostered by this bill could streamline efforts and reduce duplicative work.
- Academic Institutions and Researchers: Universities and other research bodies would likely gain additional resources and opportunities for collaboration, enhancing their capabilities to conduct significant research on climate adaptation.
- Indigenous Tribes and Native Communities: These groups could experience positive impacts through enhanced involvement in climate adaptation planning and decision-making, particularly given the bill's focus on cultural as well as natural resource management.
Negative Impacts:
- Transparency Advocates: Individuals and groups concerned with government transparency might view the bill’s exemption from competitive contracting and its exclusion of certain accountability standards as problematic. This could lead to skepticism about the fairness and integrity of the processes established by the bill.
- Potential Contractors and Organizations: Without competitive processes, businesses and organizations might find fewer opportunities to participate in contracts, potentially limiting innovation and efficient use of public funds.
In conclusion, while the Climate Adaptation Science Centers Act proposes significant advancements in climate adaptation efforts through centralized scientific efforts and collaboration, there remain critical issues related to transparency and accountability that might affect public trust and stakeholder engagement. Addressing these concerns could enhance the bill’s efficacy and acceptance among various stakeholders.
Issues
The exemption of committees and working groups from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) in Section 3 could potentially reduce transparency and accountability, leading to public trust issues.
The provision in Section 4 allowing the Director to enter into contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements without competition raises concerns about transparency, potential favoritism, and fairness in award distribution, bypassing Section 6101 of title 41, United States Code.
The broad definition of 'consortium institution' in Section 2 can lead to confusion or misinterpretation regarding entity eligibility or funding prioritization, impacting the fair distribution of resources.
The authority for wide discretion granted to the Chief of the National Center in Section 3 to add or remove consortium institutions without clear criteria could lead to accusations of bias or favoritism.
The absence of clearly defined criteria for 'regionally relevant research' and the evaluation of regional centers in Section 3 could affect the effectiveness and accountability of these centers.
The exemption from competition requirements and specific payment processes in Section 4, subsections (a) and (b), might lead to concerns about financial accountability and equal opportunity for contractors.
The language allowing broad discretion in data requests by the Secretary in Section 5 could potentially lead to overreach in data collection, raising privacy and efficiency concerns.
The exemption of financial accountability standards for committees and working groups in Section 6 might result in wasteful spending, reducing public trust in the efficient use of government resources.
The vague identification and measure of 'further the research, education, training, and advisory service activities' in Section 4 may lead to difficulties in evaluating the effectiveness and impact of funded projects.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act can be called the “Climate Adaptation Science Centers Act” or simply the “CASC Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, the meanings of various terms related to climate adaptation, cultural and natural resources, educational institutions, Native American and Native Hawaiian organizations, and governmental bodies are clearly defined. These definitions help clarify the roles, responsibilities, and contexts for entities involved in climate and resource management in the United States.
3. Establishment and duties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes the creation of a "National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers" program, run by the U.S. Geological Survey, to provide scientific expertise for managing resources related to climate change. The national center will guide and support regional centers in research, education, and collaboration, evaluate their progress, and ensure funding, while regional centers will focus on regional climate adaptation priorities and undergo annual project selections.
4. General authority to enter into contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, and interagency agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Director of the United States Geological Survey can create contracts and agreements with educational and research institutions to support climate-related research and activities. This authority allows the Director to bypass some typical legal and competitive requirements, and it also enables federal agencies to collaborate by sharing funds if it aligns with their programs. Additionally, if a service benefits more than one Indian Tribe, each tribe must agree before any contract or grant is finalized.
5. Interagency cooperation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how different parts of the Federal Government, like departments and agencies, must collaborate. They are required to share information with the Secretary when asked, cooperate with the National Center and regional centers, provide help if needed, and can also work together on projects by sharing resources like funding and data, as long as both parties agree.
6. Committees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the establishment and function of committees to advise on climate and natural resource sciences. It describes the formation of an Advisory Committee with both voting and non-voting members, detailing their roles, responsibilities, and terms of office. Additionally, the Chief of the National Center can create other committees or working groups to support scientific priorities and public participation.