Overview

Title

To require annual reports on bonuses awarded to career Senior Executive Service employees, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The BONUS Transparency Act wants government bosses to tell Congress about bonuses they give to some workers, including who got the money and how much they got. This is to make sure everything is fair and clear.

Summary AI

H.R. 10319, also known as the “Boosting Openness and Notable Understanding of Salaries Transparency Act” or the “BONUS Transparency Act,” aims to increase transparency regarding bonuses awarded to career Senior Executive Service employees within the U.S. government. The bill requires that, within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year starting with 2024, each agency must submit a report to Congress detailing performance awards given. These reports must include the total number of awards, recipients' names, job titles, salary rates, award amounts, and the source of funding for these awards.

Published

2024-12-06
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-12-06
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10319ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
402
Pages:
3
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 144
Verbs: 26
Adjectives: 16
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 16
Entities: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
40.20
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
21.86

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, known as the "Boosting Openness and Notable Understanding of Salaries Transparency Act" or the "BONUS Transparency Act," aims to establish transparency in the award of performance bonuses to career Senior Executive Service employees within the United States federal government. Introduced in the House of Representatives, it mandates that each agency provide an annual report to Congress, detailing the performance awards given. The report must include the number of awards, recipients' details, award amounts, and the funding sources.

General Summary of the Bill

This legislative proposal seeks to promote transparency and oversight by requiring detailed annual disclosures about performance bonuses given to high-level government employees. Such disclosures would give Congress—and, by extension, the public—a clearer view of how these bonuses are distributed and funded.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the proposed bill. Firstly, requiring the disclosure of personal information, such as names and salaries of bonus recipients, might raise privacy concerns. There is also a lack of specific criteria or guidelines for determining who receives these performance awards, potentially leading to inconsistent or unfair practices. Additionally, the bill does not set a cap on the total bonus amounts, which could pose financial risks without proper controls. A further operational challenge is the absence of a specific agency official tasked with compiling and submitting the required reports, potentially leading to inefficiency. Finally, without mechanisms for oversight or evaluation, there's no clear path to assess the effectiveness or fairness of the bonus system.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, this bill could have a positive impact on the public by fostering government accountability and transparency. By allowing Congress and the public to access detailed data on government bonuses, it may build trust and reduce suspicions about favoritism or misuse of funds.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Government Employees: For career Senior Executive Service employees, increased transparency might lead to greater scrutiny of their compensation, which could be perceived as intrusive or unfair.

Government Agencies: Agencies may face administrative burdens in preparing these reports, especially if guidelines and responsible officials are not clearly defined.

Taxpayers: The public gains assurance that their tax dollars are being used transparently and effectively, potentially reducing concerns about government spending.

Privacy Advocates: Concerns may arise here due to the required disclosure of personal details, highlighting a tension between transparency and personal privacy.

Overall, while the bill has the potential to enhance transparency and trust in government operations, careful consideration must be given to balancing these goals with protecting individual privacy and ensuring fair practices in awarding bonuses.

Issues

  • The requirement to disclose the name, job title, and pay rate of award recipients (Section 2) may raise privacy concerns for individuals and could lead to unintended negative consequences such as discrimination or targeting, which is a legal and ethical issue.

  • The section on annual reports (Section 2) does not specify criteria or guidelines for determining eligibility or criteria for performance awards, which could result in inconsistent or unfair distribution of awards, raising concerns about equity and transparency.

  • The section on annual reports (Section 2) lacks a specified cap or limit on the amount of money that can be allocated for performance awards, posing a potential financial oversight issue if bonus allocations become excessively large without proper control mechanisms.

  • The absence of a designated agency official responsible for compiling and submitting the report to Congress in Section 2 may lead to operational inefficiencies, confusion, or delays in the reporting process, impacting accountability and transparency.

  • The section on performance awards (Section 2) does not include any mechanism for oversight or evaluation of the performance awards system, which could hinder the ability to assess whether it is achieving its intended purpose, raising concerns about accountability and effectiveness.

  • The use of abbreviations like 'BONUS Transparency Act' in Section 1 without adequate context or definition might be misleading, potentially causing misunderstandings among stakeholders or the public.

  • The short title section (Section 1) lacks clarity about the Act's aims, as it merely provides a name without outlining specific objectives, which may cause confusion about the legislation's scope and purpose.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title for the act, which is officially named the “Boosting Openness and Notable Understanding of Salaries Transparency Act” or simply the “BONUS Transparency Act”.

2. Annual reports on performance awards for career Senior Executive Service employees Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines that each agency in the executive branch must report to Congress, within 90 days after each fiscal year starting in 2024, about performance awards given to career Senior Executive Service employees. These reports should detail the number of awards, the recipients' names and job details, the award amounts, and the funding sources, as well as define related terms like "career appointee" and "performance award."