Overview
Title
To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require creditors to consider certain additional credit information when making mortgage loans, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10316 is a rule that says banks should look at extra information, like if someone pays their rent on time, before giving them a loan to buy a house. This is to help more people, especially those who don’t have much credit history or are from different communities, get a home loan.
Summary AI
H.R. 10316 aims to amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by requiring lenders to consider additional credit information, beyond what is reported to traditional credit agencies, when evaluating mortgage loan applications. This additional information may include bank statements or rental payment history, provided the applicant authorizes it and believes their creditworthiness isn't fully reflected by conventional credit data. The bill seeks to expand access to mortgages, especially for individuals with little or no credit history and for communities of color. It also mandates that lenders treat this alternative data equally and provides consumers with multilingual notices explaining their rights and options.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation titled “Expanding Access to Credit through Consumer-Permissioned Data Act” seeks to modify the current practices in mortgage lending by amending the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The bill intends to broaden access to mortgage credit by requiring creditors to consider additional forms of credit information, such as bank statements and rental payments, not traditionally reported through nationwide consumer reporting agencies. This consideration of alternative data aims to assist individuals with limited or no credit history in achieving fairer assessments when applying for mortgage loans.
The bill also outlines the responsibilities of creditors with respect to informing applicants about their rights and ensuring that these communications are available in multiple languages. Furthermore, the bill delegates authority to federal agencies to develop regulations that incorporate consumer-permissioned data into mortgage underwriting systems.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant concerns have been identified in relation to this bill. Firstly, the use of alternative credit information that is not standardized or verified could lead to inconsistencies in credit evaluations, potentially affecting the accuracy of creditworthiness assessments. Additionally, there is a challenge in ensuring that alternative data is treated with equal weight as traditional credit data while maintaining flexibility and relevance in evaluations.
Another notable issue is the logistical and financial burden placed on creditors who are required to provide notices in the most common non-English languages. This, along with potential increased administrative costs associated with updating underwriting systems and training staff, could disproportionally affect smaller creditors.
The bill grants federal agencies significant rulemaking authority without specified deadlines, which may lead to delays in implementation and increased uncertainty for creditors who need to comply with new regulations. Lastly, the criteria for disregarding credit information that is deemed a material misrepresentation may lack clarity, resulting in inconsistent application and possible disputes.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, especially individuals with limited traditional credit history, this bill could offer meaningful access to mortgage credit. By allowing a wider range of credit information to be considered, those who have struggled to build traditional credit profiles might have better chances of securing loans. This could particularly benefit young adults, lower-income individuals, and members of racial minority groups.
However, the potential variability in alternative data quality and the additional burdens placed on creditors could lead to mixed results. If creditors face significant challenges in implementing these changes, there could be delays or even reluctance to offer mortgage credit under these new conditions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For borrowers, particularly those traditionally underserved by mainstream credit reporting systems, the bill presents an opportunity to improve their access to mortgage lending. This is especially important for renters who pay consistently but do not see these payments reflected in credit scores.
On the other hand, creditors are likely to face added scrutiny and responsibilities. The requirements to incorporate alternative data and offer multi-language notices could increase operations costs, especially impacting smaller lenders who may not have the resources to adapt quickly. Moreover, inconsistencies in evaluating alternative data might complicate lending decisions, potentially influencing lenders to be more cautious or conservative in approving loans.
Federal agencies, responsible for setting and enforcing new rules under the act, will need to balance creating regulations that are both clear and sufficiently flexible to accommodate various forms of consumer-permissioned data while avoiding unintended negative consequences for both lenders and borrowers.
Issues
The requirement for creditors to consider alternative credit information not reported through nationwide consumer reporting agencies could lead to inconsistent credit evaluations due to variability in the quality and reliability of alternative data sources. This issue is found in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(a)).
The provision mandating creditors to treat alternative data with the same weight as traditional credit information might compromise the flexibility in evaluating the credibility and relevance of different data types, potentially affecting the accuracy of credit assessments. This issue is located in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(b)).
The requirement to provide notices in the most common non-English languages could pose significant logistical and financial challenges, possibly leading to inefficiencies. This is outlined in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(c)(2)).
The reliance on federal agency rulemaking without specified deadlines might result in delays in implementation, potentially affecting compliance timelines for creditors. This issue is discussed in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(e)(2)).
Increased administrative and compliance costs might arise from updating underwriting systems and training staff, which could be burdensome for smaller creditors. This concern is mentioned in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(d) and 701A(e)).
The section does not specify guidelines on standardizing and verifying alternative data, which could result in uneven implementation and enforcement, affecting fairness and accuracy in credit evaluations. This issue can be found in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A).
The provision allowing creditors to disregard alternative credit information deemed to be a material misrepresentation might have ambiguous criteria, leading to inconsistencies in application and potential disputes. This is noted in Section 3 (\u00a7 701A(a)(1)(B) and (b)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives this Act the official title “Expanding Access to Credit through Consumer-Permissioned Data Act.”
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The findings highlight that using alternative data in mortgage lending can help people access credit, especially those without traditional credit history. It notes that changes, such as Fannie Mae’s update to its system to include rental payments, benefit consumers with low credit scores, often people of color. Additionally, new rules are set to promote open banking, giving consumers more control and protection over their financial data.
3. Requirement to consider additional credit information when making mortgage loans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require creditors to consider additional credit information, like bank statements or rent payments, when evaluating mortgage loan applicants, if the applicant requests it. Creditors must treat this information the same as traditional credit reports unless it is found to be misleading, and they must notify applicants of their rights to provide this alternative data, with notices available in multiple languages.
701A. Requirement to consider additional credit information when making mortgage loans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A creditor offering a mortgage loan must consider additional credit information that is not from a nationwide credit agency if the applicant asks, authorizes it, and believes their reported credit is incomplete. This alternative data, like bank statements or rent payments, should be treated equally to traditional credit data. Applicants must be informed of their rights in multiple languages, and any underwriting systems must comply with these rules.