Overview
Title
To make certain funds available to provide assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act in response to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 10309 wants to take money that normally helps other countries and use it to help people at home deal with big storms called Hurricanes Helene and Milton. It suggests moving some of the leftover money to make sure there are enough resources to help people who are affected by these storms.
Summary AI
H. R. 10309, known as the "Build America First Act," aims to stop federal funding for certain sections of the Foreign Assistance Act and reroute these funds to support disaster relief efforts following Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The bill proposes transferring unused funds from the Foreign Assistance Act to increase resources under the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, focusing on domestic emergency support rather than foreign aid. This legislation was introduced in the House and has been referred to relevant committees for further review.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 10309 is a legislative proposal aimed at reallocating certain federal funds to bolster disaster relief efforts in response to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill bears the short title, "Build America First Act." It articulates two primary actions: prohibiting certain appropriations under the Foreign Assistance Act and transferring unspent funds from these appropriations to support the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. This reallocation is geared towards addressing the impacts of the recent hurricanes.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several significant issues. One of the key concerns is the lack of context or justification for prohibiting federal funding for specific sections of the Foreign Assistance Act. This abrupt change might affect ongoing foreign aid programs without clear explanation or rationale. Additionally, the bill's use of technical references to specific legal sections could be challenging for those unfamiliar with the Foreign Assistance Act, limiting transparency and understanding. Another major issue is the absence of detailed oversight or accountability measures for the transferred funds, raising potential concerns about financial mismanagement. Finally, the bill does not specify the amount of money being reallocated or a timeline for transferring funds, which could obscure financial impacts and delay disaster response efforts.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill impacts the public by aiming to prioritize funding for disaster relief within the United States following significant hurricanes. This focus could potentially speed up recovery efforts, helping affected communities rebuild more efficiently. However, the lack of transparency regarding the amount of funding and oversight measures could lead to financial inefficiencies that might affect the effectiveness of disaster response.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders involved in international aid, such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and partner countries receiving U.S. assistance, the bill’s prohibition on certain foreign assistance funds could have negative implications. Programs relying on these funds might face disruptions or cancellations, potentially straining diplomatic relations and hindering global development efforts.
Conversely, for communities and local administrations directly impacted by Hurricanes Helene and Milton, the bill could offer immediate benefits by enhancing disaster response capabilities, thereby facilitating quicker recovery and reconstruction. However, this positive impact is contingent upon efficient fund management and timely allocation, aspects currently lacking in detailed planning within the bill.
Overall, while H.R. 10309 aims to redirect resources towards pressing domestic needs, its broader implications for foreign aid and potential administrative shortcomings need careful consideration to balance the priorities of domestic welfare and international responsibilities.
Issues
The prohibition of federal funding for certain provisions of the Foreign Assistance Act in Section 2 lacks clear context or justification, which could prevent necessary foreign aid programs from functioning without any provided rationale. This could be significant in terms of international relations and humanitarian efforts.
Section 2's list of prohibited funding sections under the Foreign Assistance Act may be complex for readers unfamiliar with these specific legal references. The absence of descriptions or justifications for each included section leaves readers without a full understanding of the legislative intent, impacting transparency.
The transfer of appropriations in Section 3 lacks specifics on oversight or accountability measures to ensure proper use of funds under the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. This omission could lead to financial mismanagement or misuse of the transferred funds, raising concerns about fiscal responsibility.
Section 3 does not specify the total amount of money being transferred from the Foreign Assistance Act to the Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. This lack of information could obscure the real impact on both international aid and domestic disaster relief budgets, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate fiscal implications.
There is no mention of a timeline in Section 3 for the transfer or allocation of funds, which could delay the response to urgent disaster relief needs following Hurricanes Helene and Milton, potentially prolonging suffering and recovery efforts.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act states that it may be officially referred to as the “Build America First Act.”
2. Funding prohibition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the use of federal funds for certain parts of the Foreign Assistance Act, effective from the date the Act is enacted. It includes provisions related to operating expenses and various segments of development assistance within the Act.
3. Transfer of appropriations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that any leftover money that was meant to be used for the Foreign Assistance Act will be redirected to help with disaster relief efforts related to Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.