Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue a right-of-way for an emergency exit on certain National Park Service land in the State of Virginia, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10306 is a plan to make a new, safe path for getting out of a park in Virginia if there's an emergency, like a fire. Before making this path, they need to check that it's safe for nature and look at other possible paths.
Summary AI
H.R. 10306 requires the Secretary of the Interior to grant a right-of-way for an emergency exit on certain National Park Service land in Virginia. Known as the "Blue Ridge Fire Safety Act of 2024," this bill amends a previous law, compelling the Secretary to establish this emergency path near the Blue Ridge Parkway if specific evaluations and environmental reviews are completed. It involves assessing alternative routes, analyzing potential fire behavior, and ensuring compliance with environmental laws.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The United States Congress has introduced a bill titled the "Blue Ridge Fire Safety Act of 2024," sponsored by Mr. Good of Virginia. The bill seeks to mandate the Secretary of the Interior to issue a right-of-way for an emergency exit on specific National Park Service land in Virginia. This adjustment pertains to the Blue Ridge Parkway and aims to enhance safety measures in the event of emergencies such as fires. The right-of-way is contingent on the completion of various environmental and feasibility assessments.
General Summary of the Bill
At its core, the bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to ensure that a designated emergency exit is developed along the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia. This exit is crucial for safely evacuating the area during emergencies. The bill highlights the need for specific evaluations and approvals, including analyzing alternative routes and conducting environmental reviews, before the development of this exit.
Significant Issues
Several issues arise with the bill's current outline. One of the primary concerns is the reference to a map labeled "Blue Ridge Parkway, Proposed Wintergreen Emergency Egress Near Milepost 9.6," reportedly dated September 2024. As of now, it might not be available for public review, thereby limiting transparency regarding the project's specifics and location. Furthermore, the bill requires a series of evaluations to explore alternative egress options, yet it does not delineate how comprehensive these reviews need to be. Another area of concern is the specifics on what criteria the Secretary of the Interior must meet to certify the completion of necessary analyses, particularly under laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, particularly those residing near or visiting the Blue Ridge Parkway, the bill can significantly enhance safety during emergency situations by providing a clear and established route for escape. Yet, the lack of transparency regarding the plans and criteria for evaluations could lead to public skepticism or concern about environmental impacts or land usage changes.
Impact on Stakeholders
For local authorities and emergency services, this exit could streamline evacuation procedures, potentially saving lives in crisis situations. It could reduce the logistical strain during emergencies and improve coordinated responses. On the other hand, environmental groups might express concerns about the impact of constructing a new egress on Federal land, emphasizing the necessity for thorough environmental assessments and transparency.
Additionally, the National Park Service has a vested interest in balancing safety and conservation concerns. This bill may pressure its resources to conduct and complete required evaluations and to ensure that any development aligns with environmental standards and park conservation goals.
Overall, while the proposed bill aims to improve emergency preparedness and safety, it necessitates careful consideration and execution to address significant concerns about transparency, environmental impact, and clear assessment criteria.
Issues
The map referenced in Section 2 as 'Blue Ridge Parkway, Proposed Wintergreen Emergency Egress Near Milepost 9.6', numbered 601/194,694 and dated September 2024, may not yet exist or be accessible for review as of October 2023, potentially leading to issues with transparency or public awareness of the project's specifics.
Section 2 mandates an evaluation of alternatives to the proposed right-of-way without specifying clear criteria for what constitutes a thorough or adequate evaluation, potentially leading to insufficient assessment of available options.
The requirement in Section 2 for the Secretary of the Interior to certify that all necessary analyses and reviews have been completed under acts like the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 lacks specificity on what criteria need to be met for such certification, potentially leading to ambiguity or insufficient compliance.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act gives it the official name, which is the "Blue Ridge Fire Safety Act of 2024".
2. Right-of-way for emergency exit, blue ridge parkway Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law concerning the Blue Ridge Parkway to require the Secretary of the Interior to issue a right-of-way for emergency exit if certain evaluations and reviews, like environmental impact assessments and alternative route options, are completed. The proposed emergency egress is mapped near Milepost 9.6 and must follow guidelines under the National Environmental Policy Act and other applicable laws.