Overview

Title

To direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to revise section 61.206 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, to approve certain distribution or use of phosphogypsum, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "No Radioactive Roads Act of 2024" wants to make sure that a special type of waste from making fertilizers, called phosphogypsum, which can be a bit like having invisible, tiny sun rays around (radioactive), is only used in very safe ways after checking carefully if it’s okay. It says that people need to know about any new ways it's being used, so everyone can stay safe.

Summary AI

The bill, known as the “No Radioactive Roads Act of 2024,” directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise federal regulations concerning the use of phosphogypsum, a radioactive waste byproduct, for purposes not currently authorized. It emphasizes the need for careful consideration of health risks and environmental impacts, requiring that any new use be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and adhere to strict guidelines to ensure minimal cancer risk. Additionally, the bill mandates that information about any potential new uses be made publicly available.

Published

2024-12-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-12-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10304ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
943
Pages:
5
Sentences:
21

Language

Nouns: 289
Verbs: 68
Adjectives: 50
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 40
Entities: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.55
Average Sentence Length:
44.90
Token Entropy:
5.06
Readability (ARI):
26.01

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "No Radioactive Roads Act of 2024" directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise certain regulations regarding the use of phosphogypsum. Phosphogypsum is a byproduct of fertilizer production that contains radioactive materials. Since 1992, the EPA has prohibited its use in road construction due to health and environmental risks. The bill mandates that any new uses of phosphogypsum, not already specified in existing regulations, must undergo rigorous examination to ensure public safety, particularly concerning cancer risk. The EPA must revise its regulations to evaluate these requests within two years and to make related information publicly accessible.

Significant Issues

One of the main issues with the bill is the reliance on a "case-by-case basis" for approving new uses of phosphogypsum. While this approach ensures thorough evaluation, it may result in inconsistencies in decision-making and possibly unequal treatment of different requests. Additionally, the bill highlights concerns over acceptable cancer risk levels, setting a threshold risk that raises ethical questions about public exposure to hazardous materials.

Another significant issue is the technical complexity of the compliance requirements for monitoring and reporting, which smaller entities may find challenging. This could inadvertently favor larger organizations that possess the needed resources to meet these standards. Furthermore, there is a lack of specified mechanisms for public input in the approval process, which could affect transparency and public trust.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to safeguard public health by ensuring that any use of phosphogypsum is thoroughly vetted and does not exceed established cancer risk thresholds. By requiring detailed risk assessments and making information publicly available, the bill could enhance public awareness and confidence in environmental safety measures. However, the complexity of the regulations and the focus on cancer risk might overlook other health and environmental concerns.

Impact on Stakeholders

For the general public, the bill provides a layer of protection against potential health risks associated with the use of phosphogypsum while attempting to maintain transparency. However, without public input mechanisms, there may be a sense of disconnection or dissatisfaction with the decision-making process.

For businesses, particularly those involved in construction or materials supply, the bill represents both a challenge and an opportunity. While large companies may navigate the regulatory landscape effectively, smaller entities could struggle with the compliance demands. This might discourage innovation or limit market participation for smaller businesses.

Environmental groups may view the bill positively due to its emphasis on minimizing health risks and its requirement for detailed environmental monitoring. However, they might also advocate for more comprehensive evaluations that consider the full spectrum of potential impacts beyond cancer risk, ensuring a more holistic approach to environmental and public health protection.

Issues

  • The determination of distribution or use on a 'case-by-case basis' in Section 3 might lead to inconsistencies and lack of standardization in approvals, potentially resulting in unequal treatment of applicants and affecting the fairness of the process.

  • The clarification that approval and use of phosphogypsum must not exceed a maximum individual cancer risk of 9.1 in 100,000 in Section 3 involves significant public health policy considerations, notably the ethical implications of acceptable risk levels for public exposure to hazardous materials.

  • The process for revising section 61.206 involves technical and complex monitoring and reporting requirements in Section 3, which might be challenging for smaller entities to comply with, potentially favoring larger companies with more resources.

  • There is a lack of specified mechanisms for public input or response regarding the use requests of phosphogypsum in Section 3, potentially reducing transparency and public engagement in the decision-making process.

  • The term 'maximum individual risk' is only defined in relation to cancer risk in Section 3, not considering other potential health impacts, which may oversimplify or overlook other significant health risks associated with phosphogypsum.

  • Section 2 cites technical terms like 'radionuclides' and 'leaching' without explanation, which could make it difficult for the general public to fully understand the implications and risks of using phosphogypsum.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short Title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section, titled "Short Title," specifies that the official name of the law is the “No Radioactive Roads Act of 2024.”

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress concludes that since 1992, the EPA has banned using phosphogypsum in road construction because it contains radioactive materials that increase cancer risk, can contaminate water and air, and does not meet EPA's safety standards. The EPA insists on evaluating alternatives on a case-by-case basis rather than allowing general approval.

3. Clarification of Other Purpose Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section explains that within two years, the Environmental Protection Agency must revise certain regulations to evaluate requests for using phosphogypsum in ways not already specified. These requests must include detailed risk assessments and plans to limit exposure to pollutants, consider leachate impacts, and ensure public access to information. It also specifies that any approvals should be individual considerations and set a limit on cancer risk levels.