Overview

Title

To develop a database of members of the Armed Forces who died in non-combat military plane crashes and to provide support to the families of such members, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 1030 wants to make a special list of soldiers who died in plane accidents when they were not fighting and help their families by giving them advice and linking them to people who can support them.

Summary AI

H.R. 1030, known as the “Flight 293 Remembrance Act,” aims to create a database for members of the Armed Forces who died in non-combat military plane crashes and to support their families. The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to identify and document these crashes, develop a public database of the servicemembers who died, and provide assistance to their families. This support includes helping families access benefits and services, offering personalized guidance, and connecting them with support networks. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must submit a report to Congress on the program's progress and effectiveness.

Published

2025-02-05
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-05
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1030ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,083
Pages:
6
Sentences:
14

Language

Nouns: 339
Verbs: 92
Adjectives: 50
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 35
Entities: 70

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.43
Average Sentence Length:
77.36
Token Entropy:
4.90
Readability (ARI):
41.75

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "Flight 293 Remembrance Act" (H. R. 1030), aims to honor members of the Armed Forces who lost their lives in non-combat military plane crashes. The bill focuses on three main objectives: developing a comprehensive database of such incidents, providing support to the families of the deceased, and ensuring fair and accessible processes for those seeking benefits.

General Summary of the Bill

The "Flight 293 Remembrance Act" proposes creating a detailed and publicly accessible database that documents non-combat military plane crashes. The database will include the names, ranks, and service details of Armed Forces members who perished in these tragedies. Additionally, the bill mandates that the Department of Defense, in collaboration with the Department of Veterans Affairs, offer comprehensive support to the families affected by these losses. This support encompasses guidance on available benefits, financial assistance, counseling services, and connection to community networks. The bill also seeks to establish a specific point of contact within the Department of Defense to assist families in navigating the benefits process.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill's provisions that merit consideration. First and foremost, the public accessibility of the database containing personal details raises privacy concerns. There is a risk that the information might be misused or inadequately protected, leading to further distress for families. Furthermore, while the bill encourages inclusive processes, its nondiscrimination provisions might be challenging to implement without specific guidelines, potentially affecting fair access to support services.

In addition, financial transparency may be a concern; the bill does not outline a specific budget, potentially leading to unchecked spending. The language requiring a "thorough review of records" lacks precision, which could result in inconsistent implementation and oversight.

Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders

Broadly, the public could view the bill as a positive step toward honoring the contributions and sacrifices of military personnel. By providing recognition and support to the families affected by such grave losses, it supports the broader societal value of honoring service members. This also underscores the government’s commitment to its military personnel, potentially boosting morale within the Armed Forces.

For families directly affected by non-combat plane crash losses, the bill could provide much-needed comfort and assistance. However, these benefits hinge on effective implementation and accessibility of support services. A designated point of contact within the Department of Defense promises tailored support, but the role could overlap with existing structures, potentially resulting in bureaucratic inefficiencies.

From a financial perspective, the absence of a budget cap might concern taxpayers wary of open-ended government spending. Clearer financial guidelines could allay fears of fiscal irresponsibility.

In conclusion, while the "Flight 293 Remembrance Act" aims to fill an essential gap in recognizing and supporting military families, its success largely depends on addressing the identified issues. By ensuring robust data protections, defining clear implementation guidelines, and establishing transparent financial parameters, Congress could significantly enhance the bill's effectiveness and public perception.

Issues

  • The creation and public accessibility of the database containing personal details of deceased Armed Forces members, as outlined in Section 2(a)(2), raises significant privacy concerns and potential for misuse of the information.

  • The absence of a specified budget or financial cap in the bill could lead to open-ended spending, posing financial risks and concerns about lack of fiscal constraints, as noted in Section 2.

  • The lack of clarity and potential for varying interpretations in the language of 'a thorough review of records' in Section 2(a)(1)(A) may result in inconsistent application and challenges in determining what constitutes a sufficient review.

  • The implementation of the nondiscrimination provisions in Section 2(f)(1) might be complex and difficult without further clarification, potentially affecting the fairness and legality of program operations.

  • The requirement for a designated point of contact within the Department of Defense, as stated in Section 2(c), could lead to unnecessary duplication of roles and increased administrative costs if similar positions already exist.

  • The subjective nature of assessing family satisfaction, as required in the report in Section 2(e)(3), could challenge the reliability and objectivity of the findings related to the program's effectiveness.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act names it as the “Flight 293 Remembrance Act,” which means that throughout the document, it will be referred to by this title.

2. Program to support families of members of the Armed Forces who died in non-combat military plane crashes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section establishes a program to support families of Armed Forces members who died in non-combat military plane crashes by creating a database of such incidents, providing them with benefits and support services, and designating a point of contact within the Department of Defense. It also mandates regular reporting on the program's effectiveness and enforces nondiscrimination in accessing these benefits.