Overview
Title
To abolish the United States Agency for International Development.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to shut down USAID, which is a group that helps other countries with things like food and medicine. It also says that any leftover money or stuff they have should go to another part of the government.
Summary AI
H. R. 1029 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress, 1st Session, intending to abolish the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The bill stipulates that no federal funds will be used to support the functions or responsibilities assigned to the USAID Administrator from the date the bill is enacted. Furthermore, any unused funds allotted to USAID are to be rescinded, and its remaining assets and liabilities are to be transferred to the Secretary of State. The bill has been referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations for consideration.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "H. R. 1029" proposes the complete abolishment of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). If enacted, it would prevent the allocation of federal funds to support any functions or responsibilities previously managed by USAID. Moreover, all unspent funds and resources as of the day before its enactment would be transferred to the Secretary of State. This legislative move takes an unprecedented step in reconfiguring how international aid and development efforts are governed by removing a pivotal federal agency involved in such global matters.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill introduces several significant issues that require careful consideration:
Impact on International Aid Programs: USAID plays a critical role in global humanitarian and development efforts. The bill's proposal to abolish this agency raises concerns about who will oversee and manage these international aid programs moving forward.
Management of Assets and Contracts: The provision regarding the rescission of funds and the transfer of assets lacks specificity. Questions remain about how existing responsibilities and contracts under USAID's purview will be managed, which could lead to operational gaps and legal complications.
Effect on Ongoing Projects: An immediate halt on federal funds may disrupt ongoing international projects and agreements. This disruption has the potential to create diplomatic challenges and negatively affect those in need of aid.
Impact on USAID Employees: The bill does not provide guidance on what will happen to the employees of USAID, creating uncertainties around job security and workforce management following the agency's abolishment.
Transition and Wind-down of Operations: The legislation does not outline a framework for transitioning or winding down USAID's operations, which may result in inefficiencies and disruptions.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If enacted, this bill could have broad implications. The abolishment of USAID would likely affect the United States' ability to participate in international development aid and humanitarian outreach. This could alter the country's standing and relationships globally. Furthermore, without a clear replacement mechanism, the transition could create inefficiencies, potentially resulting in negative impacts on global recipients of aid.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positively Impacted Stakeholders
- Fiscal Conservatives: Individuals and groups advocating for reduced government spending may view the abolishment as a cost-saving measure that minimizes federal expenditures on international aid.
Negatively Impacted Stakeholders
International Communities: Those reliant on aid previously administered by USAID might experience disruptions in services and support, exacerbating existing challenges in developing regions.
USAID Employees: The absence of a clear plan regarding their future raises concerns about job loss and career uncertainty.
Partner Organizations: NGOs and contractors that work with USAID may face contractual uncertainties and disruptions in funding.
In summary, while the bill may align with certain fiscal priorities, it poses significant concerns about the practicality and ethics of discontinuing support for international aid programs, along with potential diplomatic repercussions and future aid disruptions.
Issues
The complete abolishment of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as per Section 1 raises significant concerns about the management and oversight of international aid programs previously handled by the agency. This could negatively impact global humanitarian and development efforts, making it a politically and ethically crucial issue.
Section 1's provision for the rescission of unobligated funds and the transfer of assets and liabilities to the Secretary of State does not specify how existing responsibilities and contracts will be managed. This lack of clarity raises potential legal and operational concerns about gaps in oversight or service delivery.
The immediate prohibition on federal funds to carry out USAID's functions, as stated in Section 1, could disrupt ongoing international projects and commitments, leading to possible diplomatic complications and negatively impacting beneficiaries of aid programs.
The language in Section 1 does not provide details on the fate of USAID employees following its abolishment, posing potential workforce management issues. This absence of a clear transition plan could result in legal and ethical disputes regarding employment.
Section 1 lacks specific guidelines on how the transition or wind-down of agency operations would be managed, potentially resulting in operational inefficiencies or disruptions. This concern affects both the legal and practical aspects of the bill's implementation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Abolishment of the United States Agency for International Development Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The law states that starting immediately, no government money can be used for the work done by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Additionally, any unspent funds or other resources the agency had before this law will now be managed by the Secretary of State.