Overview

Title

To authorize sentencing enhancements for certain criminal offenses directed by or coordinated with foreign governments.

ELI5 AI

The DETERRENCE Act is like a big rule that makes punishments for certain crimes stricter if someone does them while working with another country. It's meant to make people think twice before doing bad things with foreign help.

Summary AI

The bill titled H.R. 10256, also known as the "DETERRENCE Act," introduces sentencing enhancements for certain crimes if they are committed in coordination with or at the direction of a foreign government. These crimes include kidnapping, murder-for-hire, influencing federal officials through threats, stalking, and offenses against U.S. officers and presidential staff. If such acts involve foreign governments, sentences can be increased by 5 to 10 years, depending on the crime and circumstances, aiming to deter external threats and address crimes involving foreign influence.

Published

2024-11-22
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-11-22
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10256ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
1,919
Pages:
10
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 433
Verbs: 148
Adjectives: 92
Adverbs: 18
Numbers: 87
Entities: 88

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.82
Average Sentence Length:
56.44
Token Entropy:
4.63
Readability (ARI):
28.12

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, House Bill H.R. 10256, titled the "Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors Act," or simply the "DETERRENCE Act," aims to authorize sentencing enhancements for certain criminal offenses linked to foreign governments. In essence, the bill seeks to impose added penalties on crimes committed in cooperation with foreign entities, such as kidnapping, murder-for-hire, and stalking, alongside other offenses targeted at federal officials and their families, as well as attempts against the President and presidential staff.

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill H.R. 10256 introduces amendments to various sections of the United States Code, with the primary goal of enhancing sentences for criminal acts facilitated by or coordinated with foreign governments. Enhanced penalties, ranging from increasing sentences by several years, are proposed for various offenses if they are carried out in conjunction with a foreign government or its agents. These offenses include kidnapping, murder-for-hire, retaliation against federal officials, stalking, and attacks on U.S. officers and employees, among others.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key concern with this legislation is the lack of clear definitions and criteria for terms such as "coordination with a foreign government" or "agent of a foreign government." Without precise language, there could be significant ambiguity, leading to inconsistent application and interpretation of the law. The absence of procedural safeguards or evidence standards to confirm such coordination is another concern, potentially raising issues about due process and judicial overreach.

The bill also proposes significant sentencing enhancements, which might be viewed, in some cases, as excessive. However, there is a noted absence of guidelines that ensure uniform application of these enhanced sentences, thereby risking disparities in sentencing outcomes. Additionally, the use of complex legal language and cross-references may hinder understanding among non-legal experts, impacting public engagement with the legislation.

Impact on the Public

The bill aims to improve national security by discouraging and penalizing criminal activities associated with foreign governments more severely. If implemented effectively, it could act as a deterrent against such offenses, thereby increasing public safety. However, the ambiguity in terminology and lack of procedural clarity may pose challenges in achieving consistent legal outcomes.

For everyday citizens, especially those who have no interactions with foreign governments, the bill may seem irrelevant. However, the potential for overly broad interpretations or errors in enforcement underlines the importance of safeguarding civil liberties and due process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For legal practitioners and law enforcement agencies, the bill presents challenges in terms of interpretation and application due to its complex language and unclear definitions. These stakeholders will require additional guidance and training to ensure consistent enforcement of the new provisions.

Foreign policy advisors and diplomats may view this legislation as a tool to strengthen the U.S. stance against foreign interference. Conversely, it could potentially strain diplomatic relations if perceived as targeting specific foreign governments without substantial evidence.

Victims of crimes that could fall under the purview of this bill may ultimately benefit from the enhanced sentences, potentially leading to a greater sense of justice and closure. However, for those wrongly accused of coordinating with a foreign government, the proposed legislative framework might not sufficiently protect against unfair prosecution.

In conclusion, while the DETERRENCE Act aims to bolster national security through stringent penalties for certain offenses tied to foreign entities, it is crucial that lawmakers revisit the bill's language to address the ambiguities and ensure a fair, clear, and effective judicial process.

Issues

  • The Act's title, 'Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors Act' or 'DETERRENCE Act', is overly complex and verbose, potentially hindering public understanding of the bill's intent. This complexity might reduce its accessibility and clarity to stakeholders. (Section 1)

  • The bill lacks definitions and criteria for key terms such as 'coordination with a foreign government', 'agent of a foreign government', and 'knowingly', which could result in significant ambiguity and inconsistent application of the law. This issue occurs in multiple sections, notably impacting Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5.

  • The lack of procedural safeguards or evidence standards to confirm 'coordination with a foreign government' may raise concerns about due process and lead to potential judicial overreach or inconsistent legal outcomes. This is a concern in several sections, including Section 6.

  • The proposed sentence enhancements, including increases up to 10 years in certain sections, might be viewed as excessive without clear guidelines for application, which could raise concerns about proportionality and fairness in sentencing. This is particularly relevant for Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7.

  • Guidelines on how enhanced sentences should be applied uniformly are missing, leading to potential disparities in sentencing outcomes. This could be particularly problematic in Section 4, where increased penalties depend on various criteria.

  • The consistent lack of oversight or review mechanisms in the bill could lead to unchecked application of sentence enhancements, thus posing an ethical concern around the fairness of the justice system. This oversight issue is evident across multiple sections, including Sections 2, 4, and 5.

  • The bill uses complex legal language and cross-references that might be difficult for non-legal experts to understand, potentially impacting its proper interpretation and the public’s ability to engage with the legislation. This complexity is evident throughout the bill but highlighted in Sections 4, 5, and 7.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The DETERRENCE Act can be referred to by its full name, "Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors Act."

2. Kidnapping Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the United States Code to increase penalties for kidnapping offenses that are linked to foreign governments. It allows for an additional 10-year sentence for crimes committed or conspired in partnership with a foreign government, and an additional 5-year penalty for attempts done in such cooperation.

3. Use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendment to Section 1958 of title 18, United States Code, introduces sentence enhancements for murder-for-hire offenses linked to foreign governments, allowing for an additional 5 to 10 years of imprisonment depending on the circumstances, and also includes technical amendments to align related legal references.

4. Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a federal official by threatening or injuring a family member Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 115(b) of title 18 in the United States Code is updated to allow additional prison time for offenses against federal officials' family members if carried out with foreign government involvement. The penalties can increase by up to 5 years for assaults with physical contact or intent to commit another felony, by up to 10 years for assaults causing bodily harm or involving a dangerous weapon, and by up to 10 years for murder-related offenses.

5. Stalking Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 5 of the bill amends Section 2261A of title 18 of the United States Code to introduce enhanced penalties for stalking offenses that are connected to foreign governments. If the crime is done with the involvement of a foreign government, penalties can be increased: by up to 5 years if serious injury, use of a weapon, or involvement of a minor occurs; by up to 10 years if the victim dies; or by up to 30 months for other cases.

6. Protection of officers and employees of the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 1114 of Title 18 in the United States Code allows for an increased prison sentence of up to 10 additional years for anyone convicted of certain offenses against U.S. officers and employees, if the crime was knowingly committed at the direction or in coordination with a foreign government or its agents.

7. Presidential and Presidential staff assassination, kidnapping, and assault Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 1751 of title 18, United States Code, allows for up to an additional 10 years of imprisonment for offenses like assassination, kidnapping, or assault against certain designated individuals if the crime was committed with knowledge and coordination with a foreign government or its agent. It also increases the penalty if the crime involves a dangerous weapon or results in personal injury.