Overview
Title
To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 to adjust the affordable housing allocations.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10249 wants to change how much money banks have to set aside to help make houses cheaper for people. It talks about raising this amount from a little bit to a bit more, but it doesn't say why or explain who will get the help.
Summary AI
H. R. 10249, known as the "Generating Resources and Opportunities Within Affordable Housing Act" or the "GROW Affordable Housing Act," proposes changes to the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992. The bill seeks to increase the affordable housing allocations by amending the rate from "4.2 basis points" to "10 basis points" as specified in Section 1337(a) of the Act. This adjustment aims to direct more resources towards affordable housing initiatives. Mrs. Beatty introduced the bill, and it has been referred to the Committee on Financial Services.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the Generating Resources and Opportunities Within Affordable Housing Act or the GROW Affordable Housing Act, seeks to amend the current Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992. It focuses on altering the financial guidelines for affordable housing allocations by adjusting the basis point rate from 4.2 to 10. Basis points are a unit of measure commonly used in finance to describe interest rates, with one basis point equaling 0.01%. This legislative change suggests a significant increase in the financial allocations directed toward affordable housing initiatives.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several important issues associated with this legislative amendment. Firstly, the significant change from 4.2 to 10 basis points could have substantial financial implications, potentially redirecting significant resources without explicit justification. The bill does not furnish a detailed analysis of why such a change is necessary or what benefits it might bring.
Secondly, the bill does not specify who the direct beneficiaries of this increased rate would be. The lack of clarity raises concerns about fairness and transparency, questioning whether certain financial institutions or housing entities might benefit disproportionately.
Additionally, there is no clear explanation of the expected outcomes of this legislative change. Understanding the intended effects on affordable housing would be necessary to assess the amendment's efficacy.
Finally, the bill does not assess potential consequences on affordable housing stakeholders, such as tenants, homeowners, or small housing developers. This absence raises questions about the risk management involved and whether any negative impacts might inadvertently occur as a result of this legislation.
Impact on the Public
If enacted, the bill could lead to an increase in financial resources allocated to affordable housing. This influx of funds might help address housing shortages and increase the availability of affordable housing options. However, without clear objectives or analysis, there is a risk that resources might not be efficiently or effectively used, potentially leading to little improvement in affordability or housing quality.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
For affordable housing developers and financial institutions involved in housing finance, the increased basis points could mean more significant investments and resources. This enhanced financial support might allow for the construction of more affordable housing units, contributing positively to community growth and development.
Negative Impacts
On the other hand, if the increase in basis points results in higher costs being passed onto tenants, this could counteract affordability benefits the bill seeks to establish. Moreover, without clear guidelines or oversight, there is a risk certain stakeholders could disproportionately benefit, which may not align with broader public housing interests.
In the broader context, the legislation's absence of detailed reasoning and potential outcomes necessitates a call for more robust analysis and clear articulation of objectives and impacts, ensuring all stakeholders, especially the most vulnerable, benefit appropriately from such legislative changes.
Issues
The amendment increases the basis point rate from 4.2 to 10, which might significantly impact financial allocations without a clear justification or analysis showing why this increase is necessary or beneficial. This issue is relevant due to its potential large-scale financial implications on housing markets and affordability. (Section 2)
The change in basis points may favor certain financial institutions or housing entities, depending on how these funds are allocated, but the section does not provide information on the beneficiaries. This could raise concerns about fairness and impartiality in how affordable housing resources are distributed. (Section 2)
The section lacks an explanation of the expected outcome or purpose for changing the basis points, making it unclear what the intended effect of this amendment is. This issue pertains to the transparency and accountability of the legislative process. (Section 2)
There is no assessment provided regarding the consequences of this increase on affordable housing or the stakeholders involved. This raises issues of risk management and the potential for unintended negative impacts on the affordable housing market. (Section 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short titles Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies that this law can be called the "Generating Resources and Opportunities Within Affordable Housing Act" or the "GROW Affordable Housing Act."
2. Affordable housing allocations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends a section of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 by changing the reference from "4.2 basis points" to "10 basis points" in multiple instances, which affects how affordable housing allocations are calculated.