Overview
Title
To amend the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 to make improvements to the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10209 is a plan to help students studying cybersecurity. It wants them to work for the government a bit longer after they graduate in exchange for a scholarship, and it makes sure the money they get isn't limited by certain rules.
Summary AI
H.R. 10209 aims to amend the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 to improve the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program. The bill proposes extending the scholarship service requirement from 3 years to 5 years. It also clarifies that the full amount of loans under this program will not be subject to limitations found in other federal student loan provisions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, H. R. 10209, seeks to amend the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014. Specifically, it aims to make improvements to the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program. Two primary changes are suggested: extending the scholarship period from three years to five years, and modifying the language concerning loan coverage to ensure the full amount is covered without other standard limitations.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are a few potential issues with the bill as currently drafted:
Increased Scholarship Duration: Extending the scholarship period from three to five years could result in higher financial commitments to sustain these scholarships over a longer term. This could impact the overall budget allocated for such educational initiatives in cybersecurity.
Loan Coverage Language: The bill's wording around loan coverage, stating that it should be the full amount "regardless of any other limitations," might unintentionally override important budgetary restrictions or guidelines. This raises concerns about financial management and potential misuse of funds.
Lack of Specificity: The use of the phrase "such part" might lead to confusion or misinterpretation. Without clearly specifying what this refers to, there could be challenges in how the law is applied and enforced.
Complexity for Policymakers: The amendment may be challenging for those not intimately familiar with the existing legislation to fully grasp its implications without additional context. This lack of clarity could hamper informed decision-making and discussions.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, particularly students interested in cybersecurity careers, this bill could offer more extended financial support and opportunities to engage with this critical field. The demand for cybersecurity professionals is growing, and longer scholarships might equate to deeper training and preparation. However, there is the potential that increased costs might limit the number of people who can ultimately benefit from this program if the available budget is constrained.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Students and Educational Institutions: The direct beneficiaries of this bill would be students pursuing cybersecurity education and the institutions that provide these programs. Longer scholarships mean more stability for students, allowing them to focus on their studies without financial interruptions.
Federal Budget and Taxpayers: Extending the scholarship period has financial implications that could affect taxpayers and federal budget priorities. Ensuring fiscal accountability will be crucial to maintaining public trust and support.
Policymakers and Implementers: There is a need for clarity and specificity in the bill to ensure smooth implementation and enforcement. Ambiguous language might complicate application, leading to inefficiencies and potential disputes.
Overall, the bill attempts to bolster the federal initiative to cultivate a robust cybersecurity workforce. It is essential, however, to address the highlighted issues to ensure that the changes are both fiscally responsible and effectively implemented.
Issues
The change from '3 years' to '5 years' in the duration of the scholarship obligations in Section 1 could potentially lead to increased costs for maintaining scholarships over a longer period, impacting the budget allocated for cybersecurity education.
The language 'regardless of any other limitations placed on such loans' in Section 1 could override important restrictions or guidelines, potentially leading to fiscal mismanagement or abuse of the loan system, raising concerns about accountability and transparency in federal scholarship funding.
The phrase 'such part' in Section 1 paragraph (1) lacks specificity, which may lead to confusion or misinterpretation regarding the exact part being referenced in the legislation, possibly affecting the implementation and enforceability of the law.
The amendment as written in Section 1 might be difficult for policymakers who are not familiar with the referenced legislation to fully understand without additional context, hindering informed decision-making and debate.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Improvements to Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service Program is being updated by extending the scholarship period from 3 to 5 years, and clarifying that loans related to the program must cover the full amount without other limitations.