Overview

Title

To amend the Natural Gas Act to require that impacts to climate stability, consumer energy costs, and environmental justice be considered in a determination of whether proposed exportation of natural gas is in the public interest, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 10207 is a plan to make sure when deciding to send natural gas to other countries, people will check how it affects climate change, costs, and communities, with everyone getting a chance to share their thoughts.

Summary AI

H. R. 10207 seeks to modify the Natural Gas Act to ensure that when deciding if exporting natural gas is in the public interest, factors such as climate change impact, consumer energy costs, and environmental justice are considered. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Energy evaluates how proposed exports could affect climate change, energy prices, and the wellbeing of vulnerable communities, with public participation considered. It removes certain exemptions from environmental reviews and calls for new rules to implement these changes.

Published

2024-11-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-11-21
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10207ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
1,762
Pages:
9
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 510
Verbs: 118
Adjectives: 139
Adverbs: 13
Numbers: 53
Entities: 74

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.30
Average Sentence Length:
70.48
Token Entropy:
5.14
Readability (ARI):
37.45

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, known as the "LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2024," aims to amend the Natural Gas Act to include considerations related to climate change, consumer energy costs, and environmental justice in evaluating whether the exportation of natural gas from the United States serves the public interest. It mandates a comprehensive review process by the Secretary of Energy to ensure that natural gas exports do not adversely affect these critical areas. The legislation introduces requirements for detailed assessments and public participation while removing existing regulatory exclusions that facilitated the approval of natural gas exports.

Summary of Significant Issues

A key issue with this bill is the broad discretion it grants to the Secretary of Energy. The language used in the bill allows the Secretary to make decisions about natural gas exportations with considerable flexibility, which could lead to varied interpretations and applications. Furthermore, the assessments required by the bill are complex and cover numerous factors, which may make compliance challenging and could result in increased administrative burdens and potential delays.

The timeframe for determining whether exportations align with the public interest could create lengthy delays, as the bill allows up to one year after certain assessments are completed to make this determination. Another issue is the vagueness of terms like "significantly contribute to climate change," which could lead to inconsistent decision-making. The lack of explicit guidance on public participation and environmental justice could hinder the bill's effective implementation.

Additionally, changes to the terminology in existing statutes, such as replacing "Commission" with "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission," lack clarity regarding their implications. Finally, the removal of regulatory exclusions without a detailed rationale leaves stakeholders uncertain about the motivations and consequences.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this bill could have significant implications for both domestic energy consumers and international energy markets. By placing stricter controls on natural gas exports, it might help mitigate environmental and economic impacts, potentially contributing to healthier communities and more stable consumer energy prices. However, it may also risk creating uncertainties in the energy market that could affect energy prices and supply.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For environmental organizations and advocates, the bill represents a positive step toward prioritizing climate change and environmental justice in energy export decisions. It aligns with broader efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources by assessing natural gas exports' potential impacts on climate goals.

Conversely, energy companies and exporters might view the bill as a potential obstacle to efficient operations, as the new requirements could slow down the approval process and increase compliance costs. Manufacturers and energy-intensive industries in the U.S. might face possible shifts in energy prices or availability.

Vulnerable communities could benefit from the bill's focus on environmental justice, as it seeks to protect them from disproportionate environmental and economic burdens. However, the effectiveness of this protection relies heavily on the precise implementation of the bill's provisions—without detailed guidelines or sufficient enforcement, these communities might not see the intended benefits.

Overall, while the bill aims for a positive environmental and economic impact, its potential effectiveness will depend on the clarity and consistency of its implementation.

Issues

  • The language in Section 2 regarding the Secretary of Energy's ability to issue orders for the exportation of natural gas 'in whole or in part, with such modification and upon such terms and conditions as the Secretary of Energy may find necessary or appropriate' is overly broad and could lead to inconsistent application and interpretation, which might be seen as allowing too much discretion for administrative decision-making.

  • The complex requirements for assessments in Section 2(4) could create difficulties for applicants to understand or predict compliance, as they involve multiple factors and subjective analyses, potentially leading to increased administrative costs or delays.

  • The phrase 'significantly contribute to climate change' in Section 2(3)(A) is vague and open to interpretation, which might cause inconsistent decision-making regarding the public interest finding for natural gas exportation.

  • The deadline for public interest determinations in Section 2(2) ('by not later than the date that is 1 year after the later of two dates') could result in lengthy delays for project approvals, creating uncertainty for stakeholders.

  • Section 2 emphasizes public participation and addresses barriers for communities with environmental justice concerns but lacks explicit detail, which could lead to challenges in ensuring effective implementation and oversight.

  • The section in process coordination, Section 3, fails to clarify the implications of changing 'Commission' to 'Federal Energy Regulatory Commission' and might lead to confusion regarding the roles and authorities involved.

  • Section 4 lacks specific information on the impact or rationale for terminating the categorical exclusion for exportation approval, which may cause confusion and uncertainty among stakeholders about the decision's motivations and consequences.

  • Section 5 in the bill does not provide specific guidance or criteria for the rule the Secretary of Energy is to issue, raising concerns about variability in interpretation and implementation and possibly resulting in further ambiguity or inconsistent application.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act states that this legislation can be referred to as the "LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2024."

2. Exportation of natural gas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section defines the requirements for exporting natural gas from the United States, emphasizing that no one can export natural gas without an order from the Secretary of Energy, who must ensure the export is in the public interest and does not significantly harm climate change goals, raise energy prices, or disproportionately impact vulnerable communities. It also mandates assessments on climate impact, economic consequences, and environmental justice, and ensures public participation in the decision-making process.

3. Process coordination; hearings; rules of procedure Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the Natural Gas Act is being updated to replace the word "Commission" with "Federal Energy Regulatory Commission," clarifying which entity is being referred to.

4. Termination of categorical exclusion for approval or disapproval of the exportation of natural gas Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the automatic exclusion for approving or rejecting the export of natural gas by ship, as described in a specific federal regulation, will no longer be valid.

5. Rulemaking Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Energy is required to create a rule to implement the Act and its amendments within one year after the law is passed.