Overview

Title

To authorize the Secretary of Education, in collaboration with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to establish an interagency advisory Commission on Advancing Restorative Justice in Elementary and Secondary Education, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 10189 is like setting up a team of grown-ups from schools and health jobs to find better ways to help kids get along and be fair to everyone, especially those from different backgrounds. They want to make school a nice place for everyone, but they need to figure out how to do it without spending too much money or making it confusing.

Summary AI

H.R. 10189 proposes the creation of an interagency advisory commission to advance restorative justice in elementary and secondary education. This commission, established by the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, will develop guidelines, training materials, and recommendations to support mental health resources and equitable discipline practices for students of color. The commission will consist of members from various educational and health organizations, and its aim is to reduce racial and gender biases and improve cultural competence among school personnel. The bill emphasizes creating a healthier and more equitable educational environment for students, particularly those of color.

Published

2024-11-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-11-20
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10189ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
1,719
Pages:
10
Sentences:
32

Language

Nouns: 544
Verbs: 112
Adjectives: 98
Adverbs: 15
Numbers: 57
Entities: 99

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.57
Average Sentence Length:
53.72
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
30.37

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

The proposed legislation, "Commission on Advancing Restorative Justice in Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2024," aims to address the disparities in disciplinary practices experienced by students of color in American schools. Introduced in the House of Representatives, the bill seeks to establish an Interagency Advisory Commission that will focus on formulating guidelines and resources for the implementation of restorative justice practices in elementary and secondary education. The Commission will work collaboratively under the guidance of the Secretaries of Education and Health and Human Services in its efforts to foster equitable learning environments and support systems that are culturally competent and sensitive to the needs of all students, particularly those of color.

Significant Issues

A notable concern about the bill is the lack of a clear budget or cost analysis for the Commission's activities. Without these financial outlines, there is potential for undefined or unchecked expenditures. Additionally, appointing 13 members from specified organizations could be perceived as favoring certain groups, leading to possible bias and affecting public trust.

Moreover, Commission members are to serve without pay, which may restrict participation to individuals who can afford to work without compensation, potentially limiting the diversity and inclusivity of the Commission. The bill also lacks defined criteria for measuring the success of its initiatives, which could result in ambiguous outcomes. Furthermore, terms such as "culturally competent" are repeatedly used without clear definitions, potentially resulting in varied interpretations and inconsistent application.

Lastly, the automatic termination of the Commission 90 days after submitting its final report might hinder the ability to adequately implement and follow up on its recommendations, potentially limiting the long-term impact of the initiative.

Broad Public Impact

The establishment of a commission dedicated to advancing restorative justice practices holds the promise of positively affecting the broader educational environment by promoting fairness and inclusivity. By targeting systemic biases in school disciplinary practices, the bill could contribute to more equitable educational outcomes and improved mental health support for students of color. This shift might foster healthier school climates and reduce the disproportionate discipline these students face.

However, the lack of financial clarity and possible biases in the Commission's makeup could undermine its effectiveness. If these issues are not addressed, the public might see it as another bureaucratic entity producing recommendations without tangible, lasting change in school systems.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For students of color and their families, the bill presents a potential path toward reducing disciplinary biases and enhancing support structures within schools. If successful, schools could become more nurturing and inclusive spaces conducive to their overall development.

Educators and school administrators might benefit from the resources and training materials the Commission could develop, providing them with new tools to address student behavior proactively and equitably. However, they may also face the challenge of adjusting to new guidelines and recommendations without explicit funding support or clear instructions for implementation.

Conversely, taxpayers and policymakers might be concerned about the lack of budgetary guidelines. Without a clear understanding of the financial implications, taxpayers could question the fiscal responsibility of establishing and operating the Commission.

Overall, the bill carries the potential for significant positive change in addressing the disparities that students of color face in school environments. However, to fulfill this promise, it will require careful attention to its financial and structural underpinnings to mitigate concerns about bias and ensure effective implementation and follow-up on its initiatives.

Issues

  • The lack of a clear budget or cost analysis for the Commission's activities could result in undefined or unchecked financial expenditure, which is a significant issue for taxpayers. This concern is related to Section 3.

  • Appointing 13 members from specific organizations might lead to perceptions of bias, which could affect public trust and undermine the Commission's credibility. This is outlined in Section 3.

  • The compensation policy for Commission members, who are to serve without pay, may limit the diversity of potential members to those who can afford to participate without financial compensation, potentially biasing the outcomes. This is an issue mentioned in Section 3.

  • The absence of defined criteria for evaluation or success metrics in the Commission's duties and final report could lead to ambiguous outcomes, making it difficult to measure success or areas needing improvement. This relates to Section 3.

  • The use of terms like 'culturally competent' without clear definitions could result in varied interpretations and inconsistent application, which could undermine the effectiveness of the restorative justice initiatives. This issue is noted in Sections 2 and 3.

  • The automatic termination of the Commission 90 days after the final report might hinder the ability to implement and follow-up on its recommendations, limiting the potential benefits of the initiative. This relates to Section 3.

  • The complexity and vagueness in the language regarding the implementation of recommendations for psychologist-to-student and counselor-to-student ratios could lead to challenges in effective execution. This is an issue found in Section 2.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act gives it a short title, allowing it to be called the "Commission on Advancing Restorative Justice in Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2024."

2. Findings; purpose Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress finds that students of color face discrimination in schools due to biases in disciplinary policies and training practices. The Act aims to support their mental and behavioral health, improve culturally competent counseling services, and ensure fair discipline and equal opportunities in education.

3. Interagency Advisory Commission on Advancing Restorative Justice in Elementary and Secondary Education Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Interagency Advisory Commission on Advancing Restorative Justice in Elementary and Secondary Education is set up to create guidelines and training for schools focusing on restorative justice practices and ensuring proper student support. It will have 13 members, meet regularly, report annually on its progress, and provide recommendations aimed at improving school climates and mental health support, particularly for students of color, before dissolving 90 days after its final report.