Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to support the research, development, demonstration, and deployment of zero-emission vessels and retrofit or replacement of existing vessels with zero-emission technologies and charging or fueling infrastructure, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Act" is about the government helping build and improve ships that don’t pollute the air, by giving money to people who create these special ships and the places they stop, like ports. They also want to make sure the people and the sea animals are safe, but they won’t use any of this money to make robot ships.
Summary AI
H. R. 10174, also known as the "Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Act," aims to establish a program led by the Secretary of Transportation to promote the development and implementation of zero-emission vessels and infrastructure. The bill seeks to provide financial support, such as grants and loans, for projects that innovate in this space, with priorities on improving efficiency, reducing underwater noise, and supporting environmental justice. It prohibits funds from being used for the study or implementation of automated vessels. Additionally, the bill calls for the creation of an advisory committee to guide and assess the progress of zero-emission shipping technologies.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Act," mandates the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program aimed at fostering the development and deployment of zero-emission vessels. The bill outlines financial mechanisms, such as grants and low-interest loans, to assist in the research and deployment of technologies that would convert or replace existing vessels with cleaner alternatives. It emphasizes environmental benefits, community engagement, and workforce development. Additionally, the bill calls for the creation of a Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Advisory Committee to guide technology development and address industry needs.
Significant Issues
Several issues emerge from the bill's provisions:
Eligibility Concerns: The bill's definition of "eligible entity" favors specific groups such as U.S.-based manufacturers and port authorities. This could potentially exclude innovative partners that do not fall under these categories, thus limiting competition and diversity in innovation efforts.
Prohibition on Automation: The broad prohibition of funds for automated systems could hinder technological advancements. Automation might play a crucial role in increasing the efficiency of zero-emission vessels, and restricting these technologies could delay progress.
Administrative Costs: Allowing up to 10% of the budget to cover administrative costs could significantly reduce the funds directly impacting program goals. This allocation might be considered excessive, especially in high-cost areas where efficient allocation of resources is critical.
Environmental Co-Benefits Definition: The term "environmental co-benefits" is broadly defined, potentially complicating the evaluation and enforcement of environmental standards. Clearer guidelines are needed to ensure the effective assessment of project proposals.
Advisory Committee Concerns: The absence of clear criteria for appointing the Chair or members of the Advisory Committee could lead to biased decision-making. Further, the lack of explicit funding and accountability measures for the Committee's operations raises concerns about efficiency and oversight.
Impact on the Public
The bill could have significant implications for the general public. Advancements in zero-emission vessel technologies may lead to a reduction in maritime pollution, potentially improving air and water quality, particularly in coastal areas. However, if financial resources are not efficiently managed or if innovation is stifled by restrictions, the intended environmental benefits might not be fully realized, delaying improvements in public health and environmental quality.
Impact on Stakeholders
Several stakeholders will be directly impacted by this legislation:
Shipping Industry: Shipping companies and manufacturers are likely to benefit from financial support for transitioning to zero-emission technologies. However, those who rely on automation might find themselves at a disadvantage if prohibited from accessing funds for these technologies.
Local Communities: Communities close to ports might experience improved air quality and economic opportunities through workforce development initiatives. Yet, these communities could face barriers if smaller local enterprises are unable to meet certain requirements like project labor agreements.
Environmental and Labor Groups: Environmental organizations may view this bill favorably due to its emphasis on reducing emissions and engaging affected communities. Labor groups may also support provisions requiring prevailing wages for construction work, though this could also lead to increased project costs.
Technological Innovators: Those seeking to introduce cutting-edge automation technologies may feel constrained by the bill's restrictions. Encouraging a more flexible approach could harness innovative solutions that balance both environmental and efficiency goals.
In conclusion, while the bill holds potential for positive environmental reform in the maritime sector, it requires careful consideration of its provisions to ensure broad, inclusive, and efficient support for zero-emission technology advancements. The success of this legislation will depend on the careful balancing of technological innovation, financial management, and stakeholder engagement.
Financial Assessment
The "Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Act" (H.R. 10174) is a legislative proposal that aims to allocate federal funds to support the development and deployment of zero-emission vessel technologies. The bill includes specific provisions regarding financial allocations, highlighting key aspects of the intended funding and its potential implications.
Financial Allocations and Spending
The bill authorizes the appropriation of $1,000,000,000 per year from fiscal years 2025 through 2034 for the Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Program. This represents a substantial investment aimed at advancing maritime technologies to combat environmental impact.
Up to 10% of the allocated funds may be used for administrative costs associated with managing the program. This administrative funding allows for the operational and logistical support needed to ensure the program's effective implementation but may raise concerns about efficiency in fund usage, as discussed in the issues section.
Relation to Identified Issues
Several issues raised within the bill's text relate to these financial allocations:
Administrative Costs: The potential diversion of up to 10% of funding to administrative costs is noteworthy. While necessary for program management, there is concern this might detract from the main objectives of funding maritime innovations, particularly if funds are mismanaged or if administrative costs could be better optimized.
Prohibition on Automated Technologies: The bill prohibits using funds for the development of automated systems related to vessel operation. This restriction could limit technological innovation, potentially missing opportunities for efficiencies and cost reductions that could align with the zero-emission goals.
Program Accessibility: The requirement for project labor agreements or community benefits agreements and the adherence to prevailing wage rates could restrict participation to larger entities capable of meeting these stipulations. Smaller companies or new market entrants might find these conditions challenging, potentially stifling entrepreneurial engagement and innovation in the zero-emission vessel space.
Measurement of Benefits: The vagueness in defining "environmental co-benefits" could complicate the evaluation of projects and measurement of success, impacting financial accountability. Clearer criteria would help in assessing whether the funds are yielding tangible and verifiable environmental improvements.
The financial references in the bill outline a robust commitment to fostering zero-emission maritime advancements, yet the potential gaps identified could influence how effectively these funds are utilized and how efficiently they contribute to the bill's environmental aims. Balancing administrative needs with innovation, ensuring fair program access, and establishing clear evaluative criteria are essential for maximizing the positive impact of this substantial financial investment.
Issues
The definition of 'eligible entity' in Section 2 is potentially problematic, as it could limit competition by favoring certain types of organizations, such as US-based manufacturers and port authorities, potentially excluding other worthy participants, particularly those that might innovate in the zero-emission vessel space.
The broad prohibition on funding for automated systems in Section 2 might limit potential technological advancements and efficiencies that automated systems could provide for zero-emission vessels, possibly hindering overall progress in maritime innovation.
Section 2 allows up to 10 percent of the budget for administrative costs, which could be considered high, potentially diverting significant resources from the primary objectives of the zero-emission program.
The definition of 'environmental co-benefits' in Section 2 is vague, potentially leading to difficulties in measurement or verification of such benefits, thereby complicating project evaluation and oversight.
Section 3's lack of specific guidelines or criteria for the Secretary’s appointment of the Chair for the Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Advisory Committee could lead to potential bias or undue influence in the Committee's operations.
The 'not fewer than 15 members' clause in Section 3 could lead to ambiguity regarding the exact number and composition of the advisory committee, complicating management and coordination among members.
Section 3 contains no specific funding allocation, management, or accountability measures for the Advisory Committee, risking inefficient or untracked spending.
The requirement in Section 2 for project labor agreements or community benefits agreements could present barriers for small applicants, raising equity concerns and potentially discouraging participation from smaller entities or new entrants.
Section 2's wage determination clause, which is tied to local prevailing wages, might lead to inflated costs in high-cost areas, challenging the efficient use of funds.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that the Act is called the “Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Act.”
2. Zero-emission vessel innovation fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Program is a program established by the Secretary of Transportation to support the development and use of zero-emission vessels, including providing financial assistance for projects such as research, design, and infrastructure upgrades. It emphasizes environmental benefits, workforce development, and community engagement while prohibiting funds from being used for automated vessel technologies.
Money References
- (h) Funding.—There is authorized to carry out the program under this section $1,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2034.
3. Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Advisory Committee Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Zero-Emission Vessel Innovation Advisory Committee is established by the Secretary of Transportation, with various representatives, to advise on the development of zero-emission shipping technologies. The committee will meet at least twice a year, identify technology gaps, and report its findings every two years to the Secretary, who will then report to Congress.