Overview

Title

To provide for international protection of digital freedom, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 10169 is a plan to help keep the internet safe and fair around the world. It wants someone in the U.S. government to make sure that people use technology in a way that is good for everyone and does not break any rules.

Summary AI

H.R. 10169, titled the "Advancing Digital Freedom Act of 2024," seeks to promote international protections for digital freedom. It emphasizes that U.S. foreign policy should prioritize digital freedom and engage with other nations to ensure technology respects democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. The bill assigns a "Coordinator for Digital Freedom" within the State Department to spearhead efforts across global platforms, including countering authoritarian uses of technology and promoting digital inclusion. An annual report on global digital freedom threats and recommendations is also mandated.

Published

2024-11-19
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-11-19
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10169ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
904
Pages:
5
Sentences:
19

Language

Nouns: 273
Verbs: 72
Adjectives: 71
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 27
Entities: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.64
Average Sentence Length:
47.58
Token Entropy:
4.83
Readability (ARI):
27.69

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The "Advancing Digital Freedom Act of 2024" is a legislative bill introduced in the United States House of Representatives. Its primary aim is to ensure the development, deployment, and governance of technology align with universal human rights, the rule of law, and democratic values. The bill emphasizes the importance of digital freedom, urging the United States to lead global efforts in protecting this freedom, combating disinformation, and promoting democratic governance in the digital sphere. The Act also establishes the role of a Coordinator for Digital Freedom within the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy, responsible for overseeing efforts to promote digital rights globally.

Summary of Significant Issues

A significant concern with the bill is the lack of an explicit definition of "digital freedom." This term appears frequently in the text but remains undefined, potentially leading to varying interpretations and affecting the clarity and implementation of the bill's provisions. Additionally, the policy statements are broad and lack specific mechanisms or frameworks for execution, raising questions about how these policies will be effectively put into practice.

The role of the Coordinator for Digital Freedom is introduced but not adequately detailed, lacking information about responsibilities, budget, and oversight. This vagueness might lead to redundancy, inefficiency, or potential misuse of the position. Moreover, the bill does not specify funding sources for implementing its provisions, particularly concerning the annual report on the state of digital freedom, which may result in concerns about wasteful spending.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill seeks to fortify digital rights and freedoms on an international level, which could benefit the public by promoting a safer and more inclusive digital environment. If effectively implemented, it could lead to greater protections against digital authoritarianism and enhance the integrity of information globally, contributing to a more informed and democratic society.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For policymakers and government agencies, the bill presents both an opportunity and a challenge. It encourages leadership in promoting digital freedom but lacks specific guidance, potentially leading to difficulties in coordinated action. Technology companies might experience increased scrutiny and pressure to align their operations with the principles outlined in the bill, especially regarding privacy, ethics, and democratic values.

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focusing on human rights and digital privacy might view the bill positively, as it aligns with their goals of promoting digital freedoms and protecting against censorship and authoritarian control. However, the undefined scope and execution mechanisms might create obstacles in effectively collaborating with governmental entities.

In summary, the bill represents a significant step towards protecting digital freedom, but its broad directives and undefined terms could hinder effective implementation, impact, and adherence by relevant stakeholders. Ensuring clarity, specificity, and funding allocation would be essential for realizing the bill's objectives.

Issues

  • The term 'digital freedom' is used frequently throughout the bill (notably in sections 2, 4, and 5), yet it is not explicitly defined. This lack of definition could lead to various interpretations, affecting the clarity and implementation of the bill's provisions.

  • In Section 2, the policy statements are broad and lack specificity, which may lead to challenges in implementation and evaluation of outcomes. The section also omits budgetary considerations or allocations, leading to ambiguity regarding financial implications.

  • Section 4 outlines duties and responsibilities for the Coordinator for Digital Freedom that are broad and may overlap with other roles or departments, potentially leading to redundancy or inefficiency. There is also no specified budget or oversight mechanisms, raising concerns about unchecked spending and accountability.

  • Sections 3 and 4 mention the 'Coordinator for Digital Freedom' position but do not detail the responsibilities or budget. The lack of specificity regarding duties and absence of oversight or accountability mechanisms could lead to potential misuse of the position.

  • In Section 5, the requirements for the annual report on the state of digital freedom lack specificity in terms of budget or funding sources, leading to concerns about potential wasteful spending. Additionally, vague language around 'concerning trends' and unclear criteria or metrics for assessing regions or countries of concern could result in subjective or biased reporting.

  • The policy language in Section 4 does not clearly specify the scope of the Coordinator for Digital Freedom’s authority or how the role fits within the existing Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy's framework, which could lead to organizational inefficiencies or conflicts.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it can be referred to as the “Advancing Digital Freedom Act of 2024”.

2. Statement of policy Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines the United States' policy to ensure technology aligns with human rights and democratic values, emphasizes the importance of digital freedom in foreign policy, and encourages collaboration with countries that respect these principles. It also commits to leading efforts to protect digital rights and combat online misinformation.

3. Coordinator for Digital Freedom defined Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the term “Coordinator for Digital Freedom” is defined as a role within the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy of the United States Department of State.

4. Role of the Coordinator for Digital Freedom Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section describes the duties of the Coordinator for Digital Freedom, whose main goal is to promote digital freedom worldwide. The Coordinator works with other countries and organizations to defend against digital authoritarianism, supports efforts related to information integrity, encourages technology that aligns with democratic values, and promotes digital inclusion and ethical AI governance.

5. Annual report on state of digital freedom in the world Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy must submit an annual report to Congress about digital freedom worldwide, which should analyze global trends like digital authoritarianism and censorship, identify regions where digital freedom is most at risk, and offer strategies to protect and enhance digital freedom.