Overview
Title
To increase penalties for the commission of financial crimes using artificial intelligence.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to give bigger punishments to people who use computers with smart brains, like robots, to do bad things with money, hoping this will make them stop using these smart computers for such tricks.
Summary AI
The bill titled H.R. 10125, known as the “AI Fraud Deterrence Act,” proposes to increase penalties for financial crimes committed with the help of artificial intelligence. It amends sections of Title 18 of the United States Code related to mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering to impose higher fines and longer prison terms when AI is involved in these crimes. The bill defines "artificial intelligence" as per the definition provided in the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020. By doing this, the bill seeks to deter the use of AI in financial crimes by imposing stricter consequences.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "AI Fraud Deterrence Act," proposes increased penalties for financial crimes committed with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). It targets specific crimes like mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering, increasing fines and potential prison sentences under specific conditions. For instance, if AI is involved in the crime, offenders could face fines up to $2,000,000 or imprisonment for up to 30 years, depending on the offense. The bill references the definition of AI from the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill is its lack of clarity on how the use of AI in committing a crime is determined. This could lead to difficulties in enforcement, as it may not be straightforward to prove AI involvement in all fraudulent activities. Additionally, by relying on an external act for the definition of AI, this bill risks inconsistencies if that act is modified in the future.
Another issue is the rationale behind the different penalties for crimes committed with and without AI, which is not clearly explained. This lack of clarity could potentially lead to questions of fairness and consistency in legal proceedings. Lastly, defining AI in different sections of the United States Code could create redundancy or contradiction if the definitions are not kept consistent across legal documents.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill could impact the public by aiming to deter sophisticated financial crimes that leverage AI technologies. By imposing harsher penalties for AI-assisted crimes, the bill seeks to address the growing challenge of technology-enabled criminal activities. This could potentially enhance financial security and trust among consumers and businesses.
However, the lack of clarity regarding enforcement and differentiation between AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted crimes might undermine the bill's effectiveness. If authorities face challenges in proving AI involvement, the bill might not have the desired deterrent effect.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
Law Enforcement Agencies: This bill could provide law enforcement agencies with stronger tools to prosecute complex financial crimes involving AI, potentially leading to more effective enforcement and deterrence.
Technology Developers and Businesses: Businesses focused on developing compliant AI tools might benefit from a clearer regulatory environment that distinguishes illegal applications of AI. However, they may also need to ensure that their technologies cannot be misused for fraudulent purposes.
Negative Impacts:
Individuals and Small Businesses: Individuals or small business owners who inadvertently use AI tools in a manner construed as assisting fraud might face harsher penalties. They could be unfairly targeted if the criteria for AI assistance are not well-defined.
Legal System: The judiciary may experience an increased burden in adjudicating cases where the line between AI assistance and traditional methods of crime is blurred, possibly leading to longer trials and legal complexities.
Overall, while the AI Fraud Deterrence Act aims to modernize legal responses to financial crimes, ensuring precise definitions and consistent penalties will be crucial to its success and fairness. The implementation details will significantly determine whether this bill is an effective tool against financial crimes or a source of further complications in law enforcement and the justice system.
Financial Assessment
The AI Fraud Deterrence Act aims to address the intersection of financial crimes and artificial intelligence by proposing stricter penalties for offenses committed with AI assistance. The legislation suggests amendments in various sections of Title 18 of the United States Code, affecting crimes such as mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering. Below is a detailed discussion of the financial references made in this bill and their implications, particularly in relation to the identified issues.
Financial Penalties
The bill proposes to increase fines for financial crimes committed with the aid of artificial intelligence. Specifically:
Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud: The maximum fine for these offenses is raised from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000. Additionally, if these crimes are facilitated by artificial intelligence, the bill holds perpetrators liable for a further fine of up to $1,000,000, imprisonment for no more than 20 years, or both.
Bank Fraud: If bank fraud is committed with AI assistance, offenders could face a fine of up to $2,000,000 or imprisonment for a maximum of 30 years, or both.
Money Laundering: When artificial intelligence is used in money laundering, the penalty could involve a fine of up to $1,000,000 or thrice the value of the involved monetary instrument or funds, whichever is greater. This also extends to imprisonment for up to 20 years.
Implications and Issues
Determination of AI Assistance: One major concern is the lack of clarity regarding how "assistance of artificial intelligence" will be determined in practical terms. This vagueness might complicate the enforcement of financial penalties, affecting consistency and fairness in prosecution. It raises questions about the specifics of involvement and the extent of AI usage required to trigger these enhanced penalties.
External Definition of AI: The bill relies on the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 for its definition of "artificial intelligence." This dependence on an external act raises the risk of inconsistencies, especially if the foundational act undergoes changes. As financial penalties are premised on this definition, any alterations could impact the applicability of these increased fines and punishments.
Justification for Financial Disparities: There is a noticeable difference in penalties for committing financial crimes with versus without AI involvement. However, the rationale for why crimes featuring AI assistance warrant significantly higher fines is not thoroughly explained within the bill. This lack of explanation may lead to concerns about fairness, as stricter consequences are imposed without a detailed understanding of why these particular violations are deemed more severe.
Potential Redundancy in Definitions: The artificial intelligence definition appears in multiple code sections, creating potential redundancy. This might lead to confusion and misinterpretation across different cases, particularly when financial penalties are calculated based on varying definitions.
In summary, while the AI Fraud Deterrence Act introduces robust financial penalties to deter the misuse of AI in fraud and laundering activities, the bill must address several issues to ensure these penalties are imposed fairly, consistently, and transparently. Clearly defining how AI assistance is determined, justifying the disparities in financial punishment, and maintaining a consistent definition of artificial intelligence are key areas to focus on for effective implementation.
Issues
The bill increases penalties for financial crimes involving artificial intelligence but lacks clarity on how 'assistance of artificial intelligence' is determined, which may lead to enforcement challenges. This affects sections 2(a)-(e).
The definition of 'artificial intelligence' is linked to an external act (National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020), risking potential inconsistencies if that act undergoes changes, as referenced in sections 2(d) and 2(e).
Differences in penalties for financial crimes committed with and without artificial intelligence in sections 2(a)-(e) are not clearly justified, potentially raising fairness and consistency concerns.
There is potential redundancy or contradiction with the definition of 'artificial intelligence' because it is defined in different sections (1346 and 1956) of the U.S. Code, as noted in sections 2(d) and 2(e).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official short title of this legislation is the "AI Fraud Deterrence Act".
2. Financial crimes and artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends various parts of the United States Code to increase penalties for financial crimes involving mail, wire, bank fraud, and money laundering if artificial intelligence is used in the crime, with fines up to $2,000,000 and prison terms up to 30 years. It also defines 'artificial intelligence' as per the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020.
Money References
- (a) Mail fraud.—Section 1341 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”; and (2) by inserting after the period at the end the following: “If the violation is committed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”. (b) Wire fraud.—Section 1343 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking “$1,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”; and (2) by inserting after the period at the end the following: “If the violation is committed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”. (c) Bank fraud.—Section 1344 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking “Whoever knowingly” and inserting the following: “(a) In general.—Whoever knowingly”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(b) Artificial intelligence.—Whoever commits subsection (a) with the assistance of artificial intelligence shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.”. (d) Artificial intelligence defined.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1346 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (A) by amending the section heading to read as follows: “Definitions”; (B) by striking “chapter, the term” and inserting the following: “chapter— “(1) the term”; (C) by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and (D) by adding at the end the following: “(2) the term ‘artificial intelligence’ has the meaning given such term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020.”. (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1346 and inserting the following: “1346. Definitions.”. (e) Money laundering.—Section 1956 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the continuation text following paragraph (1)(B)(ii), by inserting after “or both” the following: “, or, in the case that such violation is committed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or thrice the value of the monetary instrument or funds involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both”; (B) in the continuation text following paragraph (2)(B)(ii), by inserting after “or both” the following: “, or, in the case that such violation is committed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or thrice the value of the monetary instrument or funds involved in the transportation, transmission, or transfer, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both”; and (C) in the continuation text following paragraph (3)(C), by inserting after “or both” the following: “, or, in the case that such violation is committed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or both”; and (2) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (8), by striking “and” at the end; (B) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and (C) by adding at the end the following: “(10) the term ‘artificial intelligence’ has the meaning given such term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020.”. ---