Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Interior to submit to Congress a report on the National Park Service’s interpretation and application of the Standards for Rehabilitation for use of the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10116 is asking someone in charge to make a report about a program that helps fix old buildings. This report is to see how it’s been working, especially for making homes people can afford and keeping buildings safe when the weather gets bad.
Summary AI
H.R. 10116 asks the Secretary of Interior to prepare and submit a report to Congress that examines how the National Park Service interprets and applies the Standards for Rehabilitation, related to the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program. The report must be delivered within one year of the bill’s enactment and should cover program application processing details over the past ten years, suggestions to improve the Standards, and feedback from program users, with a focus on affordable housing development and addressing key issues. The report aims to provide recommendations on how the program can better support affordable housing needs and protect historic properties from climate risks.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, H.R. 10116, directs the Secretary of the Interior to provide Congress with a detailed report on how the National Park Service interprets and applies the Standards for Rehabilitation within the framework of the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program. Specifically, the report must include data from the last decade concerning the processing times of program applications, impediments faced in developing affordable housing, and opportunities for updating current standards to integrate modern needs like environmental sustainability and accessibility for persons with disabilities.
Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the ambitious scope of the reporting requirements. The need to gather and analyze data over a ten-year period may impose a substantial burden on resources and administrative capabilities. Collecting this magnitude of historical data could be both costly and time-consuming, potentially detracting from the National Park Service's primary preservation activities.
Moreover, the bill's demand for guiding improvements to facilitate affordable housing and sustainability could strain the current capacity of the National Park Service. There is a concern that the broad scope of recommendations, particularly around climate risk and economic feasibility, might be challenging to implement given the existing legal with Federal historic preservation mandates.
Public Impact
For the general public, this legislation aims to boost the utility and effectiveness of tax incentives available for preserving historic properties while fostering developments that are more responsive to current social needs, including affordable housing. Ideally, this would lead to increased preservation efforts that complement sustainable housing development, enhance community environments, and potentially generate economic benefits through tax credits.
However, the broad scope might lead to delays or difficulties in updating standards effectively. This means that the anticipated benefits in terms of facilitating more sustainable and accessible housing projects could take longer to realize. The success of this bill hinges largely on achieving a balance between preserving historic integrity and accommodating modern development needs.
Impact on Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as developers, preservationists, and local governments, the bill’s implications are mixed. Developers may welcome the clearer guidance and potential eased barriers for converting historic buildings into affordable housing. This could incentivize new development projects in historic districts, aligning economic interests with preservation goals.
On the other hand, the National Park Service may find itself overburdened by the extensive data gathering and reporting requirements. This could necessitate reallocating resources or require additional funding to meet these new responsibilities effectively. Additionally, preservation stakeholders might be concerned that efforts to ease development barriers could come at the expense of compromising historical integrity.
State reviewers and other local entities involved in preservation efforts may find the detailed reporting beneficial for improving their processes but could also be apprehensive about the feasibility of implementing rapid changes as outlined by the recommendations. This creates a delicate balance between advancing present-day needs and safeguarding historic conservation efforts.
In summary, while the intent of H.R. 10116 is commendable in trying to align historic preservation with contemporary housing and sustainability goals, its execution will require careful consideration of resource allocation, stakeholder input, and potential legal adjustments.
Issues
The requirement in Section 1(b)(1) to provide data on the processing of Program Applications over the past 10 years may be overly burdensome and costly to implement, potentially diverting resources from direct preservation efforts and creating challenges in accurate data collection.
The language in Section 1(b)(2)(B) outlining multiple opportunities for the Secretary may set ambitious goals that could overextend the current capabilities of the Service, requiring significant updates to guidance and posing potential resource allocation issues.
Section 1(b)(3) raises concerns over the clarity and feasibility of recommendations related to climate risk protection and economic and technical feasibility, which may lead to legal and financial challenges in balancing conservation with modern development needs.
The report's requirement in Section 1(b)(2)(A) to suggest areas of improvement to remove barriers to affordable housing might conflict with existing Federal historic preservation mandates, creating legal challenges over reconciling these potentially competing interests.
The definition section, specifically in Section 1(c), may benefit from integrating terms directly where they are used in the bill to enhance immediate comprehension, reducing potential legal ambiguities or misinterpretations.
There could be significant political implications if the report as required in Section 1(b)(2)(D) does not adequately address stakeholder feedback related to affordable housing development, impacting relations with local government and developers.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of the Interior to submit a report within one year detailing how the National Park Service applies certain standards related to historic preservation tax incentives. The report should cover past application data, improvements needed for affordable housing, and potential updates to existing guidelines.