Overview
Title
To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act to establish a Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security, redesignate and relocate other offices of the Department of State, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a new boss at the State Department to keep an eye on money matters like trading and helping other countries, and it also plans to spend a lot of money to do this. It includes creating new jobs and offices to study how to keep our money safe, but it needs to be careful not to spend wastefully or mess up privacy rules.
Summary AI
The bill, titled the "Economic Security and Diplomacy Act of 2024," proposes changes to the State Department by creating a new Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security. It aims to redesignate and relocate certain offices within the department to focus on economic security, such as trade, sanctions, and supply chain issues. The bill also establishes new roles, including an Assistant Secretary for Strategic Foreign Assistance and an Assistant Secretary for Technology and Innovation Security. Additionally, it calls for the creation of an Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting to analyze global economic trends and an Office of Legislative Solutions to work directly with Congress on economic security matters.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed legislation, titled the "Economic Security and Diplomacy Act of 2024," aims to amend existing laws governing the Department of State by establishing the role of a Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security. This bill seeks to reshape the structure of the Department to enhance focus on economic security issues such as sanctions policy, trade, and supply chain security. It involves the transfer and redesignation of various offices and responsibilities within the Department of State, establishing new roles focused on strategic foreign assistance and technology security.
Significant Issues
One major issue arising from the bill is the potential for centralized decision-making power with the creation of a new Deputy Secretary position. This centralization could lead to bureaucratic bottlenecks, hampering effective and timely decision-making within the Department. The extensive restructuring proposed, including transferring assets and responsibilities and establishing additional offices, brings concerns about potential disruptions and inefficiencies.
Another concern is the substantial financial commitment the bill entails. Specifically, it authorizes $10 million for the Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security and $25 million per year for the Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting. However, the bill lacks specific details on how these funds will be allocated, raising concerns of potential misuse or wasteful spending.
Furthermore, there are considerations regarding the authorization of funds to acquire artificial intelligence and machine learning tools, as the bill does not specify purchasing criteria. This could lead to favoritism or uncompetitive practices. Additionally, the bill raises privacy concerns with the creation of a Federal database on economic security, as it does not comprehensively address data security measures.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could impact the public by aiming to bolster U.S. economic security amidst global challenges such as trade tensions and cybersecurity threats. By centralizing economic security functions, the government may better coordinate its efforts to protect national interests, which can have cascading effects on economic stability and national security. However, the lack of transparency and detail surrounding the allocation of funds could arouse public skepticism about government accountability and efficiency.
Impact on Stakeholders
For taxpayers, the bill's financial implications are significant. The authorization of large sums without detailed spending plans may raise concerns over effective use of public funds. For government employees within the Department of State, the transition could create uncertainty and operational disruptions as responsibilities and roles are shuffled.
Business stakeholders involved in technology, trade, and supply chains might be positively affected as the government seeks to address economic security more robustly. Conversely, there could be heightened regulatory scrutiny and challenges as new policies and oversight mechanisms are implemented.
In summary, while the Economic Security and Diplomacy Act of 2024 aims to enhance the country's economic security apparatus, its execution might pose challenges in terms of centralization, financial oversight, and effective resource management. The balance between strengthening economic security and ensuring accountability will be pivotal to the bill's success and acceptance by the public and stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
The proposed bill, the "Economic Security and Diplomacy Act of 2024," includes specific provisions concerning financial appropriations and spending allocations that merit careful consideration.
Appropriations Overview
The bill authorizes several financial appropriations to support its objectives:
$10,000,000 is authorized to be appropriated to the newly established Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security for a two-year period. This funding is intended to support the establishment and ongoing mission of the Deputy Secretary. It includes costs for constructing a sensitive compartmented information facility and purchasing related equipment.
$25,000,000 per fiscal year is allocated to the Director of the Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting. This funding is meant to support the mission of analyzing economic trends and preparing targeting packages related to economic security.
An additional $5,000,000 per fiscal year is designated for the acquisition of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to assist with data analysis within the economic security framework.
Relation to Identified Issues
Several issues related to these financial provisions are highlighted in the bill analysis:
Lack of Specifics for Fund Allocation: The authorized amounts, such as the $10 million for the Deputy Secretary, lack detailed breakdowns or specific allocations, raising concerns about potential wasteful spending or inefficient use of resources. Without clear guidelines on how this substantial sum should be distributed or prioritized, there is a risk of funds not being effectively employed.
Potential for Bureaucratic Overhead: The establishment of new offices and roles, supported by the aforementioned funding, could lead to increased bureaucratic overhead. This expansion might result in administrative inefficiencies and additional layers of management, complicating decision-making processes and potentially leading to unnecessary expenditures.
AI and Machine Learning Tools Acquisition: The allocation of $5 million per year for AI and machine learning tools is another area of concern. The lack of detailed purchasing criteria may result in favoritism or inadequate competitive bidding, which could lead to suboptimal investment in technological tools without proper oversight or evaluation mechanisms in place.
Security and Privacy Concerns: The creation of a Federal database on economic security, part of the budget considerations, raises unresolved issues related to data privacy and security. This aspect requires careful weighing of the costs associated with protecting sensitive information, as inadequacies in these areas could result in further financial and legal ramifications.
Through these appropriations, the bill aims to fortify the economic security infrastructure of the Department of State. However, the absence of detailed fiscal strategies and oversight mechanisms invites scrutiny and discussion to ensure fiscal responsibility and the effective use of taxpayer dollars.
Issues
The establishment of a Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security could lead to centralization within the State Department, potentially creating bottlenecks in decision-making and reducing overall effectiveness. This is addressed in Section 3.
The bill authorizes substantial appropriations - $10,000,000 for the Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security and $25,000,000 per fiscal year for the Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting - without providing specific financial details or breakdowns of how these funds will be allocated, which could lead to wasteful spending. This is covered in Section 5.
The restructuring involves a significant transfer of assets, liabilities, personnel, and duties, which is extensive and might disrupt existing functions or lead to inefficiencies during the transition period if not managed carefully. This is mentioned in Sections 3 and 4.
The authorization of $5,000,000 per fiscal year to acquire artificial intelligence and machine learning tools lacks specificity about the criteria for purchasing these tools, which might lead to favoritism or lack of competitive bidding. This concern is found in Section 5.
The bill proposes the establishment of additional offices, which may lead to increased bureaucratic overhead and administrative inefficiencies, potentially resulting in wasteful spending. This is detailed in Section 4.
The language in several sections is bureaucratic and technical, such as the designation of 'SCHEDULE C' and 'COMPETITIVE SERVICE' hiring authorities, which might be confusing to those unfamiliar with federal hiring classifications and might lead to a lack of transparency or misinterpretation. This is discussed in Section 5.
The creation of a Federal database on economic security data raises concerns about data privacy and security, which are not sufficiently addressed, leading to potential legal and ethical issues. This is covered in Section 4.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill names it as the “Economic Security and Diplomacy Act of 2024.”
2. Amendments to the state department basic authorities act Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments to the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 include adding a new Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security, reducing and increasing certain figures in the law, and restructuring the Bureau to make the head an Assistant Secretary for Cyberspace and Digital Policy, who reports to the new Deputy Secretary for Economic Security.
3. Establishment of deputy secretary for economic security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the creation of a new role, the Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security, within the Department of State, which will take over responsibilities related to economic security including sanctions, trade policy, and supply chains. It also describes the transfer and redesignation of several existing positions and duties within the Department to support this new role, including changes to positions dealing with trade, investment security, and technology protection.
4. Establishment of additional offices of the deputy secretary for economic security Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The document outlines the establishment of new offices within the Department of State focused on economic and technology security. It introduces positions like the Assistant Secretary for Strategic Foreign Assistance and Assistant Secretary for Technology and Innovation Security, and creates offices for economic analysis and legislative solutions, emphasizing duties like monitoring global trends, transferring specific assets and functions, and promoting collaboration with Congress and foreign posts for economic security.
5. Authorization of appropriations and hiring authorities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes $10 million for the Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security for two years to support their mission, as well as annual appropriations for the Director of the Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting. It also outlines hiring authority, allowing up to 10 appointments in the excepted service and at least 15 in the competitive service at the Deputy Secretary's office.
Money References
- (a) Authorization for deputy secretary of state for economic security.—There is authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to the Deputy Secretary of State for Economic Security for the 2-year period beginning on the first October 1 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act to establish and carry out the mission of the Deputy Secretary, including for the construction of a dedicated sensitive compartmented information facility and the purchase of related equipment.
- (b) Authorization for director of the office of economic analysis and targeting.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Director of the Office of Economic Analysis and Targeting— (1) $25,000,000 for each fiscal year to support the mission described in section 3(c); and (2) $5,000,000 for each fiscal year to acquire artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to assist with data analysis, including through the Federal database described in section 3(c)(3).