Overview

Title

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make unlawful voting an aggravated felony.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make it a big problem for non-citizens if they vote when they're not supposed to, by calling it a very serious crime similar to other bad crimes. This means, if non-citizens vote illegally, they can be told to leave the country and might not be allowed back.

Summary AI

H.R. 10081, titled the "Deport Illegal Voters Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act by making unlawful voting an aggravated felony for non-citizens. The bill proposes changes to expand the list of activities considered aggravated felonies to include voting that violates federal, state, or local laws. As a result, non-citizens who engage in unlawful voting would be deemed inadmissible to the United States and subject to deportation.

Published

2024-11-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-11-01
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10081ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
334
Pages:
3
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 87
Verbs: 24
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 20
Entities: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.09
Average Sentence Length:
33.40
Token Entropy:
4.38
Readability (ARI):
17.44

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Resolution 10081, introduced in the 118th Congress, aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifically broadening the definition of "aggravated felonies." The bill, known as the "Deport Illegal Voters Act of 2024," seeks to categorize unlawful voting as an aggravated felony. Under this amendment, individuals who engage in voting in violation of any federal, state, or local laws would be subject to stringent immigration penalties, including inadmissibility and deportation.

Summary of Significant Issues

One primary issue with the bill is the categorization of voting offenses as aggravated felonies. Traditionally, aggravated felonies include serious crimes that warrant severe immigration penalties such as deportation and bars to future admission into the United States. Expanding this category to include illegal voting raises questions about proportionality, as it might subject relatively minor infractions to harsh consequences.

Moreover, the bill's language is notably broad and might encompass a wide array of potential voting infractions. This expansiveness could result in inconsistencies, as variations in local and state voting laws might lead to disparate applications of the law. The lack of specificity in determining what constitutes "voting in violation" may result in arbitrary and possibly unfair enforcement practices.

Additionally, abolishing paragraph (6) that relates to deportability based on voting violations might seem to align the legal framework for immigration crimes, but it introduces complexities related to legal interpretation and enforcement consistency.

Impact on the Public

Overall, the public could experience a chilling effect on voter participation, especially in immigrant communities. Individuals might become overly cautious or hesitant to engage in the voting process, out of fear of severe penalties arising from potential misunderstandings or mishaps with voting laws. This sentiment could be exacerbated in jurisdictions with less clear-cut voting regulations, fostering distrust and disengagement in civic participation.

The broad scope of the bill might also lead to a significant increase in the number of people categorized as inadmissible and deportable, escalating the already large number of immigration cases and potentially straining both legal and immigration enforcement resources.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For non-citizens and immigrant communities, the bill could introduce an additional layer of risk and anxiety surrounding their participation in democratic processes. Individuals who are not fully aware of the complex voting regulations or inadvertently violate them could face severe immigration penalties, possibly leading to permanent separation from their families and established lives in the United States.

On the administrative side, the bill may impose considerable challenges on immigration and law enforcement officials. Enforcing a law with such broad language could result in inconsistent applications, with a substantial burden to ensure fair and uniform implementation across diverse jurisdictions with varying voting statutes.

For policymakers and legal advocates, the bill may present an impetus to clarify and standardize voting laws across different levels of government, aiming to provide citizens and non-citizens alike with clear guidelines on legal voting eligibility and procedures.

In conclusion, while the intent of ensuring lawful participation in elections is crucial, the bill's broad language and potential for far-reaching consequences highlight the need for careful consideration and adjustment before implementation. Effective policies should balance the critical aim of safeguarding electoral integrity with the rights and due process considerations of all those living in the United States.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 could categorize a wide range of voting offenses under 'aggravated felonies,' which traditionally includes severe crimes, potentially leading to disproportionate consequences for less serious voting violations.

  • The broad language in Section 2 regarding unlawful voting ('in violation of any Federal, State, or local constitutional provision, statute, ordinance, or regulation') might result in inconsistent enforcement due to varied interpretations and definitions of 'illegal voting' across jurisdictions.

  • By expanding the definition of aggravated felonies in Section 2 to include unlawful voting, there is a risk of misalignment between the seriousness of the offense and the severe immigration penalties attached to aggravated felonies, such as deportation and inadmissibility.

  • The lack of specificity in defining 'voting in violation' in Section 2 could lead to arbitrary and unfair outcomes, as immigration officials might apply this provision inconsistently.

  • The changes in Section 2 involving inadmissibility and deportability might raise legal and ethical concerns as they increase the consequences for non-citizens who might unknowingly violate complex voting laws, potentially infringing on due process rights.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act establishes that it can be referred to as the “Deport Illegal Voters Act of 2024.”

2. Expanding the definition of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality Act Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section expands the list of aggravated felonies in the Immigration and Nationality Act to include voting illegally in any election, making individuals who vote unlawfully inadmissible and liable for deportation. It also removes language related to deportability based on voting violations, aligning the admissibility and deportability sections accordingly.