Overview
Title
To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the prohibition against interment or memorialization in the National Cemetery Administration or Arlington National Cemetery of persons committing Federal or State capital crimes is consistently carried out, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to disinter the remains of George E. Siple from Indiantown Gap National Cemetery, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10076 wants to make sure that people who did big crimes aren't buried in special honor places for veterans, and it plans to move someone named George from one of these places because he wasn't supposed to be there.
Summary AI
H.R. 10076, known as the "Bertie’s Respect for National Cemeteries Act," aims to ensure the regulations prohibiting the burial of individuals who have committed federal or state capital crimes at National Cemetery Administration sites or Arlington National Cemetery are consistently enforced. It requires federal officials to take reasonable steps, like checking public records, to verify that those buried in these cemeteries are eligible. Additionally, the bill specifically directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to remove the remains of George E. Siple from Indiantown Gap National Cemetery and follow procedures for notifying and returning his remains to his family.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled "Bertie's Respect for National Cemeteries Act," aims to fortify existing rules regarding the burial and memorialization of individuals who have committed Federal or State capital crimes in national cemeteries, including Arlington National Cemetery. The legislation demands rigorous checks to prevent such individuals from being interred in these hallowed grounds. Additionally, it mandates the disinterment of the remains of George E. Siple from Indiantown Gap National Cemetery and outlines procedures for notifying his next-of-kin.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill's provisions that may be challenging in its implementation. First, Section 2 requires "appropriate Federal officials" to ensure no one found guilty of a capital crime is buried in national cemeteries, yet the bill does not clearly specify who these officials are, leading to potential administrative confusion. The phrase "every reasonable action," regarding searches of public records, is also vague and could result in varying interpretations and inconsistent enforcement.
Further complications arise with the directive to disinter George E. Siple's remains in Section 3. The text does not explain why this action is necessary, nor does it outline how to deal with these remains if the next-of-kin is unreachable, potentially leading to ethical and operational hurdles. Additionally, the funding and logistics of the disinterment process remain unspecified, which may create financial burdens without clear accountability.
Impact on the Public
This bill's broad impact on the public could hinge on several factors. On one hand, strict adherence to the bill's provisions could safeguard the sanctity of national cemeteries by ensuring they serve as resting places only for those who have lived in accordance with certain legal and moral standards. On the other hand, the potential administrative burden and costs could divert resources from other public services, stirring concerns on governmental priorities and financial stewardship.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Veterans and their families stand to benefit from the assurance that national cemeteries maintain their prestige and respect by excluding individuals guilty of capital crimes. This provision could enhance the communal and symbolic value of these cemeteries.
Conversely, the families of those affected by disinterment, like George E. Siple’s, may experience distress or financial burdens, especially if the process lacks clarity or support from the authorities. Furthermore, government agencies, particularly the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense, could face logistical challenges and increased workloads due to the mandates for extensive vetting and possible disinterment operations.
Overall, while the bill intends to uphold the honor and sanctity of national cemeteries, it also poses challenges that could lead to administrative and ethical considerations for the agencies tasked with enforcing its provisions.
Issues
The provision in Section 2 requiring the appropriate Federal official to take 'every reasonable action,' including searching public records, poses potential for significant administrative effort and expense without a clear definition of 'reasonable actions,' which might be a financial concern and lead to inconsistent application.
In Section 2, the term 'appropriate Federal official' is not clearly defined, leading to ambiguity about who has the responsibility for ensuring eligibility for interment, posing a legal and administrative issue.
The amendment in Section 2 references the date of the enactment of section 2411 and the amendment made by subsection (b) without specifying exact dates, leading to potential confusion and legal ambiguities about when the rules apply.
Section 3 does not specify the reason for the disinterment of George E. Siple's remains, potentially raising ethical questions about the necessity and justification of this action.
The process outlined in Section 3 for determining the 'appropriate disposition' of the remains if the next-of-kin is unavailable is not described, leading to potential inconsistencies and legal issues.
Section 3 lacks clarification on how the 'next-of-kin of record' is verified or updated, potentially leading to administrative complications and disputes.
Section 3 does not address the costs associated with the disinterment process or who bears these costs, raising concerns about financial accountability.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Bertie’s Respect for National Cemeteries Act is the informal name given to this legislative bill.
2. Prohibition against interment or memorialization in the National Cemetery Administration or Arlington National Cemetery of persons committing Federal or State capital crimes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines amendments to regulations that prevent anyone guilty of a capital crime from being buried in national cemeteries, such as Arlington National Cemetery. It requires federal officials to thoroughly check public records to ensure those being interred have not committed such crimes and allows the disinterment of individuals if found guilty after burial.
3. Disinterment of remains of George E. Siple from Indiantown Gap National Cemetery Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to remove the remains of George E. Siple from Indiantown Gap National Cemetery and notify his closest family member. If the family member cannot be found, the Secretary must ensure the remains are handled appropriately.