Overview

Title

To direct the Attorney General to submit a report to Congress with respect to the enforcement of section 248 of title 18, United States Code, which relates to the freedom of access to clinic entrances, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The FACES Act of 2024 wants the Attorney General to tell Congress how well they are making sure people can get into clinics without any trouble. They also want ideas on how to do this even better.

Summary AI

H. R. 10063, known as the "Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Study Act of 2024" or the "FACES Act of 2024", directs the Attorney General to submit a report to Congress regarding the enforcement of laws related to accessing clinic entrances. This bill requires the report to include actions and challenges in prosecuting violations, variations in enforcement across judicial districts, and recommendations for overcoming these challenges. Additionally, it must address how best practices are shared with state and local law enforcement, and suggest necessary federal legislation to improve enforcement.

Published

2024-10-29
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-10-29
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10063ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
416
Pages:
3
Sentences:
5

Language

Nouns: 132
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 11
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 26
Entities: 42

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.17
Average Sentence Length:
83.20
Token Entropy:
4.63
Readability (ARI):
43.32

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Study Act of 2024" or "FACES Act of 2024," mandates the Attorney General to compile and submit a detailed report to Congress concerning the enforcement of section 248 of title 18, United States Code. This particular section pertains to the freedom of access to clinic entrances, thus providing protection for those accessing or providing reproductive health services. The report is to be submitted within one year of the Act's enactment and should encompass several key elements, including the steps typically undertaken to enforce the FACE Act, identifiable challenges and variations across regions, best practices, and any necessary legislative recommendations to improve enforcement.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several notable concerns, some of which stem from its lack of specificity. For instance, terms such as "discernable impediment" and "discernable variation" remain vague, potentially leading to inconsistent application and understanding. Additionally, the bill does not specify criteria or metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of the actions and plans recommended, which could hinder assessment and oversight efforts.

Furthermore, there is no mention of the costs or resources required for the Attorney General to produce and submit this report, which might result in financial inefficiencies or misuse of resources. Another issue is the absence of provisions for accountability or follow-up on the recommendations that the Attorney General might propose, raising doubts about the practical impact of the legislative actions suggested by the report.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The public interest in this bill largely revolves around ensuring the freedom of access to reproductive healthcare services, a matter of significant social importance. By potentially improving the enforcement of clinic entrance access laws, the bill could enhance the protection of individuals seeking and providing these services, thereby reinforcing their rights and freedoms. However, without adequate clarity and practicality in the bill's requirements and processes, there may be limited public confidence in its ability to deliver meaningful advancements.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as reproductive health service providers and their clients, may be directly impacted by this legislation. If effectively implemented, the bill could offer increased security and enforcement against potential violations of clinic access laws, thus offering them greater peace of mind and protection.

Conversely, law enforcement agencies at both the state and local levels might face challenges due to potentially vague directives and a lack of clarity about resource needs for report generation and enforcement actions. For these agencies, the absence of a concrete framework for evaluating enforcement efforts might lead to uneven or delayed application of the law across different jurisdictions.

In summary, while the FACES Act of 2024 proposes a well-intentioned framework aimed at safeguarding access to critical health services, its effectiveness will heavily depend on addressing the outlined issues related to specificity, resources, and accountability. Without resolving these concerns, the Act's potential to deliver significant improvements for stakeholders remains uncertain.

Issues

  • The section related to the report on enforcing the freedom of access to clinic entrances (Section 2) lacks specific criteria or metrics for evaluating the success or effectiveness of the actions and plans proposed. This lack of specificity could lead to ineffective oversight and accountability of the Attorney General's actions, making it difficult to measure the bill's impact.

  • Language within Section 2, such as 'discernable impediment' and 'discernable variation', is vague without additional explanation or examples. This vagueness could lead to varied interpretations and inconsistency in the application and understanding of the terms across different judicial contexts.

  • Section 2 does not specify the cost and resources required to create and submit the report, potentially resulting in financial inefficiencies. Without a clear outline of needed resources, the effort may lead to wasteful spending if not managed properly.

  • There is no provision for accountability or follow-up in Section 2 to ensure that the recommendations in paragraph (6) are considered and potentially enacted. This lack of a feedback loop could hinder the effective implementation of proposed solutions and legislative actions.

  • The plan to overcome impediments and resolve variations described in paragraph (4) of Section 2 lacks specificity regarding how it will be developed and implemented. This could result in challenges in formulating a viable and actionable plan, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the title of the act, stating that it can be referred to as the "Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Study Act of 2024" or simply the "FACES Act of 2024."

2. Report on enforcing the freedom of access to clinic entrances Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Attorney General to send a report to Congress within one year of the Act's enactment. This report should outline the steps taken to enforce the FACE Act, identify and address challenges across different regions, suggest improvements, share best practices among law enforcement, and recommend necessary legislation.