Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the excise tax on investment income of private colleges and universities.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1006 is a law idea that wants to make private colleges and universities pay more money from the money they earn from things like savings and investments, raising the tax from a small bit to a much bigger bit if they charge students more money too quickly. Also, smaller schools might have to start paying this tax too.
Summary AI
H. R. 1006 proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code to modify taxes on the investment income of private colleges and universities. It suggests increasing the current tax rate from 1.4% to 10%, and further to 20% for institutions that raise their net prices faster than the Consumer Price Index allows. The bill also plans to broaden the scope of the tax, targeting institutions with specific financial criteria, and will take effect starting in tax years after December 31, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House of Representatives Bill 1006, titled the "Higher Education Accountability Tax Act," proposes amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill seeks to modify the excise tax imposed on the investment income of private colleges and universities. Under the current law, this excise tax is set at 1.4 percent. The bill plans to increase the rate to 10 percent, with a potential further increase to 20 percent for institutions whose tuition rises faster than the cost of living, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. Additionally, the bill proposes expanding the range of institutions subject to this tax by lowering the asset threshold from $500,000 to $250,000. These changes are set to take effect starting the 2025 tax year.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the significant issues with the bill is the proposed increase in the excise tax rate from 1.4 percent to 10 percent. Many argue that this substantial increase could significantly burden private colleges and universities, potentially affecting their ability to offer affordable education. Furthermore, a provision in the bill introduces a higher tax rate of 20 percent for institutions deemed "net-price-increase institutions." This classification could disproportionately impact colleges that need to raise prices due to economic reasons but still remain affordable compared to regional or national averages.
Another point of contention is the provision to reduce the asset threshold for taxation from $500,000 to $250,000, thereby placing financial pressure on smaller educational institutions that might not have significant endowment resources. The requirement to compare net price increases to the Consumer Price Index adds further complexity, potentially requiring additional administrative input from institutions.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The passage of this bill could have widespread implications for both higher educational institutions and prospective students. By potentially increasing the financial burden on private colleges and universities, this bill might lead to increased tuition fees or reduced financial aid offerings as institutions attempt to offset the higher tax rates. Consequently, students and families may find it more challenging to afford private higher education, potentially widening the gap in educational access and opportunities.
For specific stakeholders, such as smaller private colleges and universities, this bill presents a potential threat to their financial sustainability. These institutions may lack the larger endowments necessary to absorb such tax increases, risking their ability to operate without hiking tuition fees significantly.
Conversely, supporters of the bill might argue that it holds educational institutions more accountable for their financial practices, particularly in light of tuition increases that outpace inflation. By tightening financial regulations, the bill could incentivize universities to keep costs in check, potentially benefiting students in the long run.
In essence, while the bill aims to address concerns about rising educational costs, it also introduces potential financial and administrative challenges for private colleges and universities, with broad implications for current and future students. The complexity and breadth of these changes invite ongoing debate among policymakers, educational leaders, and the public.
Financial Assessment
Financial Overview
H.R. 1006 introduces significant amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, specifically targeting the investment income of private colleges and universities. The primary financial aspect of this bill is the proposal to increase the current excise tax rate on investment income from 1.4% to 10%. Additionally, a further increase to 20% is suggested for institutions identified as "net-price-increase institutions"—those raising their net prices faster than the Consumer Price Index (CPI). These modifications are coupled with an expanded definition of institutions subject to tax, now including those with endowment thresholds reduced from $500,000 to $250,000.
Impact on Private Colleges and Universities
The proposed ten-fold increase from 1.4% to 10% in the excise tax rate could impose a significant financial burden on private colleges and universities. Such a substantial rise in taxes might strain these institutions' financial resources, potentially impacting their operational budgets and ability to offer affordable education. This financial strain aligns with concerns about the political and economic challenges this increase could pose, as identified in the issues section.
Net-Price-Increase Institutions
The additional increase to 20% for net-price-increase institutions specifically targets those raising tuition prices above the CPI. This provision aims to penalize institutions that pass on excessive costs to students. However, it could disproportionately affect colleges forced to raise prices due to genuine economic needs, potentially sparking debates around fairness and equity in the application of this tax.
Redefined Financial Thresholds
The reduction of the endowment threshold from $500,000 to $250,000 broadens the scope of institutions liable for the excise tax. This change means smaller institutions, which previously might have been exempt, now find themselves within the taxable bracket. By including more institutions under this tax, the bill raises concerns about the financial sustainability of smaller colleges, potentially placing them at risk.
Timing and Preparation
Finally, the bill, as set to take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, might not provide sufficient time for institutions to adjust their financial plans. Given the complexities involved in navigating new tax regulations and potentially altering tuition pricing structures, colleges and universities may face logistical and compliance challenges.
In sum, H.R. 1006 introduces considerable financial implications for private colleges and universities, emphasizing the urgency for these institutions to evaluate their investment income strategies and pricing policies accordingly. The highlighted issues reflect the broader conversation about the balance between institutional accountability and financial sustainability in higher education.
Issues
The increase in the excise tax rate from 1.4 percent to 10 percent under Section 2(a) may impose a significant financial burden on private colleges and universities. This drastic increase could impact their ability to provide affordable education, making this a politically and financially charged issue.
The term 'net-price-increase institution' in Section 2(b) relies on definitions from the Higher Education Act of 1986. Given the potential discrepancies in these definitions, the amendment could cause confusion and legal challenges about which institutions qualify as net-price-increase institutions if the definitions are outdated.
The additional increase in tax rate to 20 percent for net-price-increase institutions as outlined in Section 2(b)(1) could disproportionately affect institutions that need to hike their prices due to economic necessities yet remain affordable compared to regional or national averages. This could spark ethical and political debates about fairness.
Section 2(c) proposes reducing the endowment threshold from $500,000 to $250,000 for institutions subject to the tax. This potentially exposes smaller institutions to financial risk and may impact their sustainability, making it a significant financial and ethical concern.
The timing of the effective date in Section 2(d), which applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, may not give institutions sufficient time to adjust their pricing strategies and financial planning, creating legal and logistical challenges.
The complexity of the clause regarding net price increases compared to the Consumer Price Index in Section 2(b)(2) may prove difficult for institutions to navigate, requiring additional administrative resources and potentially leading to unintended compliance burdens.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill, titled "Short title", states that the Act can be referred to as the “Higher Education Accountability Tax Act”.
2. Modification of excise tax on investment income of private colleges and universities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the tax law would increase the excise tax on investment income for private colleges and universities from 1.4% to 10%, and further to 20% for those whose tuition rises faster than the cost of living. Additionally, the requirement for which institutions are taxed will expand by lowering the asset threshold from $500,000 to $250,000, with these changes effective starting in the 2025 tax year.
Money References
- except that such price shall be determined by taking into account all first-time, full-time undergraduate students at the institution (in addition to such students who receive student aid).”. (c) Expansion of institutions subject to tax.—Section 4968(b)(1)(D) of such Code is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$250,000”.