Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study on the effect of driver-controlled technology in motor vehicles with respect to severe traffic injuries and traffic fatalities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10051 is like a homework project where the Transportation Secretary and some experts need to study how things like touchscreens in cars might make driving more or less safe, and then tell Congress what they find out in a big report.
Summary AI
H.R. 10051 is a bill that directs the Secretary of Transportation to work with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study how driver-controlled technology, such as touch screen systems in cars, affects severe traffic injuries and fatalities. The study will investigate various factors like how these technologies impact driver distraction and accidents, and compare them to using smartphones while driving. The Secretary will provide a report with findings and recommendations to Congress within 24 months of starting the study to help reduce traffic accidents and improve data collection on these issues. The bill defines terms like "commercial motor vehicle" and "driver-controlled technology" to clarify what the study will cover.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Driver Technology and Pedestrian Safety Act of 2024," directs the Secretary of Transportation to collaborate with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine on a comprehensive study. This study will explore the impact of driver-controlled technologies, such as touch screens in vehicles, on severe traffic injuries and fatalities. The bill mandates the study to examine a range of factors, including driver distraction and the design of user interfaces, to understand better how these technologies affect road safety. Additionally, it requires the submission of a report to Congress within 24 months, followed by recommendations to improve safety and data collection efforts.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several key issues that need consideration:
Limited Competition for Conducting the Study: The requirement for the Secretary of Transportation to enter into an exclusive agreement with the National Academies may limit opportunities for other qualified organizations to participate, potentially reducing competition and diverse insights.
Ambiguity in Definitions: The term "driver-controlled technology" is not clearly defined, which may lead to confusion about what technologies are included. This clarity is crucial for the scope and focus of the study.
Timeline and Resource Allocation: While the bill outlines a timeline for the report and recommendations, it does not specify how long it will take to implement these suggestions. Additionally, it lacks details on the budget and resources, making it challenging to assess efficiency and potential wasteful spending.
Comprehensive Study Scope: The study's scope is broad, including examining complex issues like interface designs and comparing them with smartphone use while driving. This complexity might hinder clear and actionable findings.
Evaluation and Implementation: The bill does not specify how the effectiveness of the recommendations will be monitored or evaluated. This raises concerns about whether these changes will be successfully implemented.
Impact on the Public Broadly
This bill addresses a significant concern for public safety, as technology in vehicles continues to evolve rapidly. By potentially identifying risks associated with driver-controlled technologies, the bill aims to help reduce traffic accidents and fatalities. This could lead to increased safety on roads and potentially lower healthcare costs related to traffic injuries. However, its effectiveness depends on the successful execution of the study and implementation of actionable recommendations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
General Public: If the recommendations result in effective regulations or improvements in technology design, the general public would benefit from safer driving conditions and reduced accident risks.
Automobile Industry: Manufacturers may face new design and regulatory requirements based on the study’s findings. This could lead to increased production costs but also opportunities to innovate in response to changing safety standards.
Policy Makers: Successful completion of the study could provide policymakers with valuable data to craft informed legislation that addresses emerging road safety challenges presented by new vehicle technologies.
Research Organizations: The exclusive partnership with the National Academies could limit involvement from other research entities, affecting the diversity of research perspectives and expertise.
In summary, while the bill aims to enhance road safety through a detailed study of driver-controlled technologies, it presents several issues related to competition, clarity, and implementation. Addressing these concerns will be crucial to realizing the potential safety benefits for the public.
Issues
The requirement for the Secretary of Transportation to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine may limit opportunities for other qualified organizations to conduct the study, potentially creating a lack of competition. This is outlined in Section 2(a).
The text does not define 'driver-controlled technology' clearly, which may lead to ambiguities regarding what technologies are included in the study, as noted in Section 2 and Section 4.
The timeline for the report and recommendations is unclear. There is a 24-month period for the report and a 2-month period for the recommendations, but there is no explanation on what an appropriate or expected timeline is for implementing the recommendations once they are provided, as detailed in Section 3.
The definition of 'commercial motor vehicle' relies on external legislation (section 31132 of title 49, United States Code, and section 346 of Public Law 114-328), which may require further clarification or cross-referencing to ensure that the definition is easily accessible and understood, as stated in Section 4.
The complexity of the requirement to assess the impact of replacing traditional controls with touch screen-based systems might lead to difficulties in implementing and interpreting study findings, as identified in Section 2(c).
The lack of detail regarding the budget or resources allocated to conduct the study and prepare the report and recommendations makes it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending, as highlighted in Section 3.
The inclusion of a broad category for any other relevant information in subsection (c)(6) of Section 2 could create scope creep, leading to undefined expansiveness in the study.
The directive to compare injuries and fatalities related to touch screen-based systems with those related to smartphone use as per Section 2(c)(4) may not account for overlapping usage, leading to potentially misleading comparisons.
The bill does not specify how the recommendations will be monitored or evaluated once categories are established, raising concerns about accountability and effectiveness, as mentioned in Section 3.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that the official name of the law is the "Driver Technology and Pedestrian Safety Act of 2024."
2. Driver-controlled technology safety study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a plan where the Secretary of Transportation will partner with the National Academies to study the impact of driver-controlled technologies, like touch screens, on traffic accidents and fatalities, examining factors like driver distraction and the effect of different conditions and system designs. The study aims to provide recommendations for improving safety based on data collected over a decade.
3. Report and recommendations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Transportation must submit a report to Congress within 24 months about a traffic study and later provide recommendations on reducing traffic injuries and fatalities. These recommendations should be categorized based on whether they can be implemented by existing authorities or require new federal laws, with a focus on data collection about the use of touch screens and smartphones while driving.
4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms related to motor vehicles, including what qualifies as a "commercial motor vehicle" and "motor vehicle," as well as specific technologies like "driver-controlled technology," "tactile motor vehicle control," and "touch screen-based system." It clarifies the roles and characteristics of these technologies in vehicles.
5. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section explains that the Act does not prevent or delay any government rules from being made. Additionally, if a part of the Act is unclear, a court should follow a sensible explanation given by the Secretary of Transportation.