Overview

Title

To establish within the Office of Land and Emergency Management of the Environmental Protection Agency the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 10023 is about creating a new office to help clean up old, messy mines, especially those without anyone to fix them, like some on Native American lands. This new group will figure out the best ways to clean up these dangerous places and work with lots of people to get the job done.

Summary AI

H. R. 10023, titled the "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024," aims to create the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains within the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Land and Emergency Management. This new office would coordinate efforts to clean up abandoned hardrock mine sites across the U.S., with a special focus on those without responsible parties and sites on Native American lands, including uranium mines in the Navajo Nation. The bill outlines duties such as developing best practices, working with various agencies and stakeholders, and providing assistance to state and local governments for mine site response actions.

Published

2024-10-22
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-10-22
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10023ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,937
Pages:
11
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 626
Verbs: 144
Adjectives: 89
Adverbs: 17
Numbers: 57
Entities: 127

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.58
Average Sentence Length:
77.48
Token Entropy:
5.11
Readability (ARI):
42.30

AnalysisAI

Editorial Commentary

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024" seeks to establish a new body within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) called the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains. This office is tasked with coordinating efforts to address environmental concerns at dormant hardrock mining sites, particularly those located on Native American lands and within the Navajo Nation. The bill outlines the office's responsibilities, which include collaborating with various government agencies, developing best practices for mine cleanup, and providing technical assistance. The bill is positioned within a framework that does not expand the regulatory authority already held by the EPA.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues require consideration regarding this bill. The bill lacks clarity on its financial framework, specifically how funding for the new office will be allocated and monitored. This raises concerns about potential inefficient use of resources. Additionally, the bill outlines a complex coordination structure involving multiple federal, state, and tribal entities, which could lead to bureaucratic inefficiencies and delays.

The criteria for prioritizing mine sites and creating the Priority Mine List are not clearly defined, leaving room for arbitrary decision-making. Also, the bill does not introduce new regulatory powers, which may limit the new office's ability to enforce compliance or take necessary actions. The comprehensive coordination plan for addressing uranium contamination in the Navajo Nation lacks specifics for measuring success, accentuating the need for detailed evaluation metrics.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to address environmental concerns associated with dormant hardrock mines, with potential positive impacts on environmental health and safety. Effective cleanup operations could enhance water quality, reduce pollution risks, and improve the overall ecological condition in affected areas.

However, due to the absence of a clear budget and the potential for bureaucratic delays, there is a risk that the intended environmental benefits could be underdelivered. Without specific performance benchmarks or accountability measures, it may be challenging to track the progress or success of the cleanup efforts effectively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For communities residing near dormant mine sites, particularly those in Indian country and on Navajo lands, the bill offers a potentially significant environmental and health benefit by addressing longstanding pollution issues. However, these benefits hinge on the effective implementation of the bill's provisions, which currently lacks specifics on priorities and outcomes.

Federal and state agencies may face challenges due to the bill's detailed requirements for coordination and consultation, requiring them to navigate potentially cumbersome bureaucratic processes. Tribal governments, especially the Navajo Nation, could be positively impacted by improved cleanup efforts.

In contrast, mining companies might view the bill's emphasis on nonliable parties' involvement with skepticism, considering potential administrative burdens without new regulatory considerations. Additionally, environmental advocacy groups may support the bill’s intentions but could express concern over the complexity and potential ineffectiveness due to lack of clear regulatory authority.

Overall, while the bill's intentions are praiseworthy, its successful implementation will largely depend on resolving the identified issues and ensuring that the office has the resources and authority necessary to achieve its goals effectively.

Issues

  • The establishment of the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains in Section 2 does not clearly outline its budget or how funds will be appropriated and monitored, potentially leading to wasteful spending, which could be a significant concern for taxpayers and financial oversight bodies.

  • Section 2 details complex bureaucratic coordination with various federal, state, and tribal entities that may result in inefficiencies and delays in response actions, raising concerns about governmental effectiveness and timely responses to environmental issues.

  • The absence of clearly defined priorities for covered mine site response actions and criteria for creating the Priority Mine List in Section 2 could lead to arbitrary or biased decision-making, potentially disadvantaging certain communities or areas.

  • The lack of new regulatory authority in Section 2 might hinder the newly established office's ability to effectively implement necessary actions or enforce compliance, raising questions about the adequacy of existing legal frameworks to address current environmental challenges.

  • Section 2 includes requirements for regular updates and coordination with various committees and agencies, which could create administrative burdens, slowdown processes, and lead to duplication of efforts, potentially affecting efficiency and accountability in governmental operations.

  • The plan for interagency coordination on uranium contamination on Navajo Nation lands in Section 2 lacks detailed criteria for evaluating success or addressing potential conflicts among agencies, which might pose risks to the health and safety of affected communities.

  • Section 2's language lacks clarity regarding specific outcomes, performance benchmarks, or accountability measures for the newly established office, raising concerns about transparency and the ability to track progress or measure success.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the act establishes its short title, specifying that it can be referred to as the "Legacy Mine Cleanup Act of 2024."

2. Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text establishes the Office of Mountains, Deserts, and Plains within the Environmental Protection Agency to coordinate efforts for handling dormant hardrock mining sites, especially those in Indian country and the Navajo Nation. It outlines the Office's roles, such as collaborating with various agencies and stakeholders, creating best practices, and providing technical assistance, but it does not grant any new regulatory authority.