Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax credit for taxpayers who remove lead-based hazards.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 10001 is a plan to give people some money back if they fix their homes to get rid of dangerous lead paint, but they need to follow special rules to get this help. The government wants to make sure more kids stay healthy by helping families remove lead from their homes.
Summary AI
H.R. 10001 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to offer a tax credit to individuals who undertake activities to remove lead-based hazards from their homes. The bill specifies that taxpayers can receive a credit for up to 50% of the costs incurred in removing lead-based paint, replacing fixtures, or carrying out other lead hazard reduction measures, with a maximum credit of $4,000 per residence. The proposal aims to reduce the incidence of lead poisoning, particularly in children, by encouraging the safe removal of lead hazards in older homes. The legislation also includes provisions for documentation and limitations on double benefits to ensure proper implementation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, H.R. 10001, titled the "Home Lead Safety Tax Credit Act of 2024," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide a tax credit to taxpayers who undertake efforts to remove lead-based hazards from their homes. The bill recognizes the significant health risks posed by lead exposure, particularly to children, and aims to incentivize homeowners to reduce these hazards by offering financial assistance via tax credits.
General Summary of the Bill
This legislative proposal offers a tax credit for up to 50% of the costs associated with lead hazard reduction activities in homes. These activities include both lead abatement measures and interim lead control measures, with specified credit caps based on the type of work performed. The allowable credit for more comprehensive abatement activities can reach up to $3,000, while for less extensive interim measures, the credit is capped at $1,000. Across all methods, the total tax credit for an individual home may not exceed $4,000. The eligibility for this credit extends to dwellings placed in service before 1978, reflecting the ubiquity of lead-based paints in constructions of that era. The plan is set to terminate on December 31, 2028.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the bill's provisions. Notably, the definition of what constitutes a "qualified contractor" is limited to those approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency. This could restrict homeowner access to the tax credit by excluding other capable contractors. The provision allowing lead hazard removal costs to be counted against prior tax years adds complexity to the tax filing process, potentially leading to errors. Furthermore, the requirement to obtain documentation from certified inspectors might hinder homeowners in areas where such professionals are scarce. Critically, the bill lacks clarity on who will monitor compliance with lead reduction criteria, which could weaken enforcement.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the bill represents a proactive step towards reducing lead poisoning, particularly in homes with young children. The tax credit could significantly alleviate the financial burden associated with lead hazard reduction, making these health-improving measures more accessible. However, the administrative complexity and potential barriers in accessing qualified professionals might dilute its intended impact.
In terms of potential downsides, there is a concern that the bill's limitation to pre-1978 homes and its mode of allocating credits could incentivize rushed actions as the termination date approaches, potentially leading to substandard work. Moreover, states and municipalities with existing lead safety programs might find this federal initiative interacts awkwardly with local efforts.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For homeowners, the bill offers financial relief for undertaking necessary safety measures, providing a considerable incentive to make homes safer for children. However, the strict definition of eligible contractors may make it difficult for some homeowners to benefit from the credit. Additionally, individuals in regions lacking certified inspectors or risk assessors could find themselves excluded from the relief this bill promises.
Contractors specializing in lead removal might see an increase in business; however, those not specifically approved by the designated federal departments could face exclusion, despite possessing valid certifications from other reputable entities.
For policymakers and regulators, the bill presents challenges in establishing effective oversight systems to monitor compliance and effectiveness, with the risk of inefficient fund use without adequate check mechanisms.
Overall, while the "Home Lead Safety Tax Credit Act of 2024" endeavors to address a critical public health issue through financial incentives, careful consideration of its operational details and potential execution barriers will be essential for its success. Effective implementation will require overcoming identified challenges, ensuring equitable access to the offered credits, and aligning federal actions effectively with existing state and local programs.
Financial Assessment
The proposed legislation, H.R. 10001, is primarily focused on offering a tax credit as a financial incentive for homeowners who engage in activities to remove lead-based hazards from their residences. This financial aspect is central to the bill as it directly affects taxpayers’ eligibility for relief when addressing potential health threats posed by lead-based materials in older homes.
Financial Allocations and Limits
The bill proposes a tax credit of up to 50% of expenses incurred by homeowners in mitigating lead hazards. This credit is capped at $3,000 per dwelling unit for significant lead abatement projects and $1,000 for interim lead control measures. Importantly, the cumulative limit for this credit per residence over the lifetime of this tax incentive is set at $4,000. This measure seeks to balance providing financial assistance with containing the overall fiscal impact of the bill.
Issues Arising from Financial Provisions
1. Complexity in Credit Calculation: One of the prominent issues identified is the complexity involved in calculating the eligible credit amount, especially considering provisions like the reduction of the property's basis by the credit amount. This complexity could lead to errors or misunderstandings, particularly among those unaccustomed to detailed tax calculations.
2. Restriction on Contractor Authorization: The bill's limitation on eligible contractors to those approved by specific federal agencies may narrow the pool of contractors, thereby potentially increasing the costs of lead hazard reduction activities. This could affect the overall out-of-pocket expenses for homeowners and reduce the financial burden relief intended by the tax credit.
3. Potential Impact of Inflation Adjustment: The schedule for inflation adjustments, which updates the credit limits based on inflation, adds a layer of financial unpredictability. While it aims to keep the credit's value consistent over time, without a clear methodology detailed in the bill, adjustments could lead to unexpected increments, impacting budget planning and financial predictability for all stakeholders involved.
4. Tax Credit Documentation and Compliance: The requirement for documentation from a certified professional could become a hurdle, especially in areas with a lack of such personnel. This condition might limit the ability of homeowners to claim the credit and maximize its financial benefits, reducing the policy's effectiveness in addressing lead hazards.
5. Termination Date and Its Effects: The provision that ends the tax credits after December 31, 2028, creates an urgency that may not align well with the financial timelines of extensive lead removal projects. This deadline may pressure homeowners to complete works hastily, potentially compromising quality, which impacts not only safety but also financial decisions framed around expected tax benefits.
By understanding these financial elements and limitations, stakeholders, including lawmakers, taxpayers, and financial advisors, can better prepare for the fiscal impacts and navigate the associated complexities of this legislative proposal.
Issues
The definition of 'qualified contractor' in Section 2 may be overly restrictive by limiting authorized contractors to those approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Environmental Protection Agency. This could exclude competent contractors trained by other reputable programs, potentially reducing the availability of contractors and increasing costs for taxpayers.
The provision allowing costs to be applied to the prior taxable year in Section 2 may complicate tax compliance and increase the burden on both taxpayers and tax authorities, potentially leading to confusion and errors.
The requirement for documentation by a certified inspector or risk assessor in Section 2 might be a barrier to taxpayers, especially in regions lacking certified professionals, thereby limiting access to the tax credit for some.
The section on Home Lead Hazard Reduction Activity Tax Credit in Section 2 does not specify who will be responsible for monitoring compliance with the lead hazard reduction criteria, leading to potential enforcement issues and undermining the effectiveness of the credit.
The termination of the tax credit after December 31, 2028, as described in Section 36C, may not provide sufficient time for taxpayers to benefit, especially for significant projects that span multiple years. It might incentivize rushed or substandard work near the deadline.
The inflation adjustment clause in Section 36C could lead to unanticipated increases in credit allowances without clear guidelines on the adjustment process, potentially impacting the bill's financial predictability.
The provision requiring the reduction of the property basis by the amount of the credit in Section 36C might be complex for taxpayers to calculate and understand, potentially leading to errors in tax filings.
In Section 1, there is no mention of oversight mechanisms or accountability measures to ensure that funds are spent effectively and not wasted or misused, which could be a concern for ensuring the successful implementation of the act.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; findings; purpose Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Home Lead Safety Tax Credit Act of 2024 aims to reduce lead poisoning in children by encouraging the removal of lead hazards from homes. The Act highlights the dangers of lead, especially to children, and notes that federal programs have only been able to help a small fraction of affected homes due to funding limits.
2. Home lead hazard reduction activity tax credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section introduces a tax credit for homeowners to offset 50% of the costs for reducing lead hazards in homes built before 1978, up to $3,000 or $1,000 depending on the type of work done. The total credit per home cannot exceed $4,000, and this provision will not apply after December 31, 2028.
Money References
- “(b) Limitations.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any eligible dwelling unit for any taxable year shall not exceed— “(A) $3,000 in the case of lead hazard reduction activity cost including lead abatement measures described in clauses (i), (ii), (iv), or (v) of subsection (c)(1)(A), and “(B) $1,000 in the case of lead hazard reduction activity cost including interim lead control measures described in clauses (i), (iii), (iv), and (v) of subsection (c)(1)(A). “(2) OTHER TAX CREDITS.—In the case of any credit against State or local tax liabilities which is allowable under the laws of any State or political subdivision thereof to a taxpayer with respect to any costs paid or incurred by the taxpayer which would otherwise qualify as lead hazard reduction activity costs under this section, the amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any eligible dwelling unit for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) shall not exceed an amount equal to the excess, if any, of— “(A) the lead hazard reduction activity cost paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year for such unit, over “(B) the amount of such State or local tax credit. “
- cumulative amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for an eligible dwelling unit for all taxable years shall not exceed $4,000.
- “(d) Inflation adjustment.—In the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2025, each of the dollar amounts in subsection (b) shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(1) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(2) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2024’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- Any increase determined under the preceding sentence shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.
36C. Home lead hazard reduction activity Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 36C of the bill, it explains that homeowners can receive a tax credit for half the cost of reducing lead hazards in homes built before 1978, up to $3,000 for certain abatement measures and $1,000 for other interim measures, with a total limit of $4,000 per home. This credit is set to end after December 31, 2028, and costs cannot be claimed if they were covered by grants or other funding, while all activity must be documented by certified inspectors.
Money References
- (b) Limitations.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any eligible dwelling unit for any taxable year shall not exceed— (A) $3,000 in the case of lead hazard reduction activity cost including lead abatement measures described in clauses (i), (ii), (iv), or (v) of subsection (c)(1)(A), and (B) $1,000 in the case of lead hazard reduction activity cost including interim lead control measures described in clauses (i), (iii), (iv), and (v) of subsection (c)(1)(A). (2) OTHER TAX CREDITS.—In the case of any credit against State or local tax liabilities which is allowable under the laws of any State or political subdivision thereof to a taxpayer with respect to any costs paid or incurred by the taxpayer which would otherwise qualify as lead hazard reduction activity costs under this section, the amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for any eligible dwelling unit for any taxable year (determined after application of paragraph (1)) shall not exceed an amount equal to the excess, if any, of— (A) the lead hazard reduction activity cost paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year for such unit, over (B) the amount of such State or local tax credit. (3) LIMITATION PER RESIDENCE.—The
- cumulative amount of the credit allowed under subsection (a) for an eligible dwelling unit for all taxable years shall not exceed $4,000.
- (d) Inflation adjustment.—In the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 2025, each of the dollar amounts in subsection (b) shall be increased by an amount equal to— (1) such dollar amount, multiplied by (2) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2024’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
- Any increase determined under the preceding sentence shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.