Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating to Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts.
ELI5 AI
H. J. RES. 90 is a proposal from Congress saying they don't agree with a new rule about how special contracts to help the environment should be handled, and they want this rule to stop being used.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 90 is a joint resolution expressing congressional disapproval of a specific rule by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The rule pertains to "Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts." If enacted, this resolution would render the CFTC's guidance ineffective. It was introduced in the House of Representatives and sent to the Committee on Agriculture for consideration.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
This bill, H. J. RES. 90, is a joint resolution that expresses Congress's disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The rule in question provides guidance on the listing of contracts associated with voluntary carbon credits. By passing this resolution, Congress is effectively nullifying this CFTC guidance, meaning it will not be enforced.
General Summary of the Bill
The resolution straightforwardly conveys Congress's intent to disapprove and invalidate a rule issued by the CFTC. This rule pertains to the guidance on how contracts linked to voluntary carbon credits should be listed. Despite its simplicity, the resolution stops short of offering any reasoning behind this disapproval. Consequently, the rule, once disapproved, is deemed to have "no force or effect."
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the legislative text and its implications. Firstly, the absence of any justification for the disapproval can lead to confusion among stakeholders who depend on these regulations for clarity and direction. Furthermore, the resolution refers to a Federal Register entry dated October 15, 2024, which poses temporal ambiguities since it predates the date of the resolution itself.
Additionally, while the directive that the rule "shall have no force or effect" is explicit, it leaves much to be desired in terms of explaining the consequences for the affected parties. This can result in unclear outcomes for those involved in the trading and regulation of carbon credit derivatives. Moreover, the bill does not propose any alternative guidance, potentially creating a regulatory vacuum.
Lastly, the specific reference to the Federal Register without context could be problematic for individuals unfamiliar with how to access these documents, complicating their ability to understand the full extent of the disapproved guidance.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
This resolution could have broad implications for the public by affecting both environmental and financial policies associated with voluntary carbon credits. Given that carbon markets are critical in efforts to combat climate change, any uncertainty or gaps in regulation could slow progress on environmental goals. The absence of this guidance could affect environmental strategies that rely on clear and predictable carbon credit derivatives.
For stakeholders directly involved, such as those in the financial markets or industries with significant carbon footprints, this disapproval could lead to increased uncertainty. Without clear guidance, market participants might face legal and operational uncertainties that could lead to reduced market activity or increased risk. On the other hand, some stakeholders might view this as a positive development if they felt the original guidance was burdensome or restrictive.
In summary, while this resolution unequivocally disapproves a specific CFTC rule, the lack of explanation or alternatives leaves many open questions about its impact on carbon credit markets and environmental policy. This uncertainty may engender challenges for stakeholders navigating the regulatory landscape.
Issues
The bill disapproves a final guidance from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission but provides no reasons for this disapproval, potentially leading to ambiguity and confusion among stakeholders and the public, who may not understand the rationale behind Congress's decision. (Section: General Disapproval)
The reference to a future date for regulation publication (October 15, 2024) creates uncertainty regarding the timing and current applicability of the disapproval, making it difficult for stakeholders to assess the immediate impact and relevance of this joint resolution. (Section: Regulation Publication Date)
The phrase 'such rule shall have no force or effect' is direct but lacks further elaboration on the potential consequences and implications of the disapproval for involved parties and stakeholders, which could lead to legal uncertainties and complications. (Section: Directive Clarity)
The bill does not suggest any alternative actions or guidance to be taken following the disapproval, potentially leaving a policy gap that could affect the regulation and trading of voluntary carbon credit derivative contracts, impacting financial markets and environmental strategies. (Section: Absence of Alternative Actions)
The citation of the specific Federal Register (89 Fed. Reg. 83378) without additional context may pose difficulties for readers unfamiliar with where to access this document, thus impeding their ability to fully understand the context and details of the disapproved guidance. (Section: Reference Clarity)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress expressed disapproval of the final guidelines issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission concerning the listing of contracts tied to voluntary carbon credits, indicating those guidelines will not be enforced.