Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment.
ELI5 AI
Congress is looking to stop a new rule by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that changes a plan about cleaning the air in Ohio, because they don't agree with it. They want to make sure the EPA's rule won't happen, but they didn't say exactly why.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 66 is a joint resolution proposed in the House of Representatives aiming to block a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule in question deals with the withdrawal of a technical amendment to an air plan approval for Ohio. By passing this resolution, Congress seeks to ensure that the EPA rule has no legal effect. This legislative action reflects the use of congressional disapproval to regulate agency decisions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The joint resolution, H. J. RES. 66, seeks congressional disapproval of a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains to the withdrawal of a technical amendment related to the Air Plan Approval for Ohio. The resolution states that upon disapproval, the rule will not have any legal effect. Sponsored by several representatives from Ohio, the bill has been referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Summary of Significant Issues
There are several notable issues with the bill that arise from the lack of specific details and context:
Lack of Rationale: The bill disapproves of the EPA's rule without providing any specific reasons for this decision. This lack of explanation can lead to questions about the motivations and transparency behind the legislative action.
Insufficient Background Information: There is a lack of background information concerning the rule and the technical amendment it addresses. Without this context, it is challenging for stakeholders to understand the reason behind the disapproval and its implications.
Potential Impacts: While the bill clearly states that the rule will have no force or effect, it does not clarify the potential environmental or regulatory consequences of this decision. It may lead to uncertainty about future environmental regulations in Ohio.
Absence of Alternative Measures: The bill does not propose any alternative solutions or measures to address whatever issue the original rule was intended to resolve. This omission may create a regulatory gap or uncertainty about the next steps for stakeholders.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The resolution's lack of clarity and context could impact public understanding of legislative actions concerning environmental regulations. Without knowing the specific reasons for disapproving the rule, the public might find it difficult to assess the overall impact on air quality management in Ohio. This absence of clear communication could reduce trust in legislative decisions on environmental issues, which are crucial for public health and safety.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For specific stakeholders, such as environmental groups and regulatory agencies, the disapproval without an articulated rationale or alternative measures may pose a significant concern. Environmental organizations might worry about the potential weakening of air quality controls in Ohio if an existing technical amendment is withdrawn without an equivalent or better replacement.
Regulatory agencies like the Ohio EPA may face challenges in maintaining compliance with federal air quality standards if there is uncertainty about the legal status of regulations. This could further complicate efforts to implement effective air quality management plans, potentially affecting industries and communities relying on clear guidelines for environmental compliance.
In conclusion, while the resolution aims to nullify a regulatory change, its lack of detail and transparency raises significant concerns about the reasoning and potential impacts of such legislative actions. Addressing these issues with more comprehensive information would benefit all stakeholders involved.
Issues
The bill disapproves a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) without providing specific reasons, which could lead to ambiguity about the rationale behind this disapproval. This may raise questions about the transparency and motivations behind the legislative decision. [Section 1]
The lack of background information on the rule or the technical amendment that the legislation seeks to disapprove makes it difficult for stakeholders, including legislators and the public, to fully understand the implications of the disapproval. This can hinder informed debate and discussion. [Section 1]
The reference to the Federal Register, while specific (90 Fed. Reg. 6811 (January 21, 2025)), does not provide enough context for understanding the content or implications of the rule being disapproved. This limits the ability of stakeholders to assess the rule's impact accurately. [Section 1]
The phrase 'such rule shall have no force or effect' is clear but lacks clarification on the potential impacts, such as environmental or regulatory consequences. This may lead to uncertainty regarding the future of environmental regulation in Ohio and beyond. [Section 1]
The bill does not mention whether any alternative measures are proposed to address the issues related to the disapproved rule. This omission could create uncertainty about the regulatory gap or the next steps for both the EPA and affected parties. [Section 1]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains that Congress disapproves of a specific rule made by the Environmental Protection Agency regarding the removal of a technical amendment in Ohio's air plan, and it states that this rule will not be effective.