Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing.
ELI5 AI
Congress looked at a new rule about pollution from making car tires and decided they didn't like it, so they said, "Nope, it won't count!"
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 61 is a joint resolution from the 119th Congress aimed at disapproving a specific rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule relates to the "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants" concerning the manufacturing of rubber tires. The resolution asserts that Congress does not support the rule, and as a result, the rule will not have any legal effect. The resolution passed the House of Representatives on March 5, 2025.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill in question, H. J. RES. 61, is a joint resolution from the 119th Congress that seeks to disapprove a rule set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule in question pertains to the "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants" specifically concerning the rubber tire manufacturing industry. If passed, this resolution would mean that the EPA's rule would not be enacted and would have no legal standing.
Summary of Significant Issues
A notable issue with this resolution is the reference date of November 29, 2024, for the rule in the Federal Register. At the time of this resolution, that date is in the future, raising questions about whether the document referenced is accurate and legally appropriate for this disapproval process.
Additionally, the resolution lacks context on why Congress seeks to disapprove this rule. Without understanding the reasons behind the disapproval, stakeholders, including industries and environmental groups, may have difficulty interpreting the implications of this congressional action.
The document also provides no information about the potential impacts of overturning the rule on air pollution control efforts or on industries involved in rubber tire manufacturing. This absence of context and analysis might be a cause of concern for both environmental advocates and industry stakeholders who need to understand possible changes.
Lastly, there is no mention of any financial implications that might result from disapproving the rule. This absence makes it challenging to gauge the broader economic consequences of the disapproval.
Impact on the Public
This resolution could have broad implications for public health and environmental quality. Disapproving an EPA rule designed to set standards for hazardous air pollutants in rubber tire manufacturing might affect air quality negatively, potentially impacting public health, particularly in areas near manufacturing plants. Conversely, it could benefit consumers or industries if the disapproved rule contained compliance costs that would otherwise increase product prices.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental groups and public health advocates, this disapproval might be seen negatively as it could hinder efforts to reduce hazardous air pollution. The absence of these standards could lead to environmental degradation and health concerns, particularly in communities surrounding tire manufacturing facilities, which often include vulnerable populations.
On the other hand, stakeholders within the rubber tire manufacturing industry might view this disapproval favorably. If the initial rule imposed stringent requirements or significant compliance costs, industries might find relief in its disapproval, potentially preserving jobs and reducing operational costs.
However, administrative and enforcement challenges might arise for the EPA and manufacturing industries due to the resolution's phrase that "such rule shall have no force or effect." Without clear guidance on regulatory practices following the disapproval, there could be confusion within both regulatory and industrial sectors about current obligations and standards.
In conclusion, while the measure aims to block an EPA rule, it opens several broad and specific questions about its implications, effectiveness, and the underpinning rationale for such congressional disapproval.
Issues
The reference date 'November 29, 2024' for the Federal Register is a future date, which raises concerns about the accuracy and legality of the document reference as it should reflect a past document for a disapproval process. (Section)
There is a lack of context on why the rule is being disapproved, which could lead to ambiguity and misunderstanding of the rationale behind the congressional action. This may impact stakeholders' ability to effectively respond or adjust to the disapproval. (Section)
The document does not explain the potential impact of disapproving the rule on air pollution control efforts or the affected industries, which might be significant for policymakers and the public interested in environmental and economic implications. (Section)
No specific spending details are provided, making it unclear if there are any financial implications related to disapproving this rule, which is crucial for understanding the broader economic impacts of the decision. (Section)
The phrase 'such rule shall have no force or effect' lacks information about the immediate consequences on regulatory practices, which could lead to administrative confusion and enforcement challenges within the EPA and the rubber tire manufacturing industry. (Section)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress disagrees with a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency about air pollution standards for rubber tire manufacturing, and they have decided that this rule will not be put into effect.