Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels).
ELI5 AI
Congress made a plan to stop a new rule made by the EPA that was about how certain big tanks store liquid that can easily make fumes, like gas. They want to cancel it so that it doesn't become a rule everyone has to follow.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 43 is a joint resolution that seeks to nullify a specific rule made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule in question involves the "New Source Performance Standards Review" for storage vessels that hold volatile organic liquids, including petroleum. By this resolution, Congress intends to officially disapprove of this rule, meaning it would be canceled and have no legal effect.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill in question, known as House Joint Resolution 43, involves congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule pertains to "New Source Performance Standards Review for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels," which includes those used for storing petroleum liquids. Essentially, this resolution seeks to nullify the EPA's proposed standards, meaning that these new requirements would not be enforced if the resolution were to pass.
Significant Issues with the Bill
One of the primary issues with this resolution lies in its lack of transparency regarding the reasons for disapproval. The text does not elaborate on why Congress believes the EPA's rule should not be implemented. This absence of context can lead to confusion about the broader intentions of Congress and the specific critiques of the rule.
Additionally, there is a peculiar reference to a future date of October 15, 2024, which might generate misunderstandings concerning the timeline and urgency surrounding the disapproval. Furthermore, the text does not explore the potential implications of this legislative move for stakeholders, such as industries that would be affected by the storage standards or the regulatory bodies involved. The technical nature of the language used may also prove challenging for the general public to comprehend, thus reducing its accessibility.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, this resolution, if passed, could lead to the status quo being maintained with respect to how volatile organic liquids and petroleum are stored. This might suggest that companies will not need to invest in new technologies or procedures to meet the now-rejected EPA standards. For the general public, this could mean a continued reliance on existing safety and environmental regulations, without the enhancements the EPA rule sought to introduce.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For certain stakeholders, particularly those in industries related to the storage and handling of volatile organic compounds, this resolution could represent a positive development. It might save these businesses from incurring additional costs associated with compliance to the new standards proposed by the EPA. However, for environmental advocacy groups and regulators, the disapproval of the EPA rule might be seen negatively. It could be perceived as a missed opportunity to strengthen environmental protections and improve public health outcomes associated with emissions from storage vessels.
In summary, while the resolution provides clear legislative disapproval of an environmental rule, the lack of detailed reasoning and exploration of consequences underscores the need for greater clarity and communication within such legislative processes.
Issues
The section lacks clarity regarding the reasons for disapproving the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency, which may lead to misunderstandings about Congress's intentions and the rationale behind the disapproval (Section related issue).
The reference to a future date (October 15, 2024) in the text may not be accurate or could lead to confusion if the document is intended to be read before that date, potentially affecting the understanding of the effective timeline for the disapproval (Section related issue).
The section does not provide details on the implications or consequences of the disapproval for stakeholders involved, such as affected industries or regulators, which could lead to uncertainty and lack of preparedness among stakeholders (Section related issue).
The language used is somewhat technical, referencing a specific rule without further explanation, which may not be easily understood by the general public or non-experts, potentially reducing transparency and accessibility of the information (Section related issue).
There is no information about any alternative solutions or proposals to address the issues covered by the disapproved rule, which could be seen as a lack of proactive legislative planning and foresight (Section related issue).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress disapproves the rule proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency about new standards for storing volatile organic liquids and decides that this rule should not be enforced.