Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions.
ELI5 AI
Congress is saying "no" to a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency, which was about how some companies handle their waste. They didn't explain why they're saying "no" or what the companies should do instead.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 35 is a joint resolution proposed in the 119th Congress that seeks to repeal a specific rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains to the "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems," which includes procedures for assisting compliance, netting, and exemptions. The resolution expresses Congress's disapproval of this EPA rule and declares that it should not be enforced.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Joint Resolution 35, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to formally disapprove a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning waste emissions charges for petroleum and natural gas systems. This rule outlines procedures for facilitating compliance, including the concepts of netting and exemptions, which were published in the Federal Register. The resolution indicates that Congress does not want this EAP rule to take effect, effectively canceling its implementation.
Summary of Significant Issues
The resolution does not offer detailed reasons for disapproving the EPA rule. This absence of explanation leaves questions about the motivations behind Congress's decision. Additionally, the text does not provide an overview or context for the EPA rule, making it difficult to understand what the regulation entails or its intended impact on industries or the environment. The reference to the Federal Register title "89 Fed. Reg. 91094" might be complex for those unfamiliar with legal jargon, possibly diminishing clarity. Lastly, the resolution does not suggest any alternative measures or corrective actions to replace the disapproved rule, which might lead to uncertainty for affected industries.
Potential Impact on the Public
The disapproval of the EPA rule could have various repercussions for the general public. On one hand, if the rule aimed to reduce environmental harm from emissions, its disapproval might result in negative environmental impacts over time, affecting air quality and public health. On the other hand, by halting an unpopular regulation, Congress might be seen as preventing potential financial or administrative burdens on industries, which could indirectly benefit consumers by maintaining stable prices for petroleum and natural gas products.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill's impact on stakeholders—primarily the petroleum and natural gas industries—could be significant. Those industries might view this congressional disapproval as beneficial, as it removes compliance costs and operational changes imposed by the rule. Conversely, environmental advocacy groups and communities focused on sustainable practices might see this as a setback in efforts to regulate emissions and protect the environment.
Furthermore, regulatory bodies like the EPA could find their authority and capacity to enforce environmental protections challenged or limited, depending on whether new measures or solutions are introduced to replace the revoked rule. The ambiguity and lack of guidance in the resolution could also result in uncertainty for those working to adhere to environmental guidelines, potentially inhibiting long-term planning and investment in clean technologies within these industries.
Issues
The disapproval of the rule by Congress is stated without providing a detailed rationale for the disapproval (SECTION 1). This lack of transparency can lead to ambiguity about the reasons behind this decision, making it difficult for stakeholders to understand the motivations and potential impacts.
The text does not explain the rule or its implications (SECTION 1), which makes it challenging to evaluate the potential impact on the environment or the industries involved. Without this context, stakeholders and the general public may struggle to assess the necessity and consequences of the rule's disapproval.
The reference to '89 Fed. Reg. 91094' should be clarified for those unfamiliar with federal register citations (SECTION 1). The use of complex legal terms without explanation could be seen as lacking accessibility, hindering public understanding of the legislative process.
The language in the bill does not specify alternative measures or actions to replace the disapproved rule (SECTION 1). This absence of guidance can lead to uncertainty in regulatory compliance for the affected industries, leaving them without a clear path to follow in the absence of the revoked rule.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress disapproves of the Environmental Protection Agency's rule about waste emissions charges for petroleum and natural gas systems, and they say that this rule should not be enforced.