Overview
Title
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to balancing the budget.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make a new rule that says the government can't spend more money than it earns and needs special permission to spend extra or raise taxes. This would help keep the country's money balanced, but there are special rules for emergencies like wars.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 3 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to help balance the national budget. The resolution requires that government spending does not exceed income and limits spending to 18% of the country's gross domestic product unless approved by a two-thirds majority in Congress. It also stipulates that any tax increase requires a two-thirds majority vote and that the national debt limit can only be raised if approved by three-fifths of Congress. There are exceptions to these rules during times of war or severe military threats, but they require a specified majority vote in Congress.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution, titled H. J. RES. 3, aims to enforce stricter budgetary discipline by requiring that government spending does not exceed its income or 18% of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) unless Congress approves exceptions with a supermajority vote. This proposal outlines measures to curb new taxes and increase the statutory rate of taxes, tighten control over federal debt increases, and allow for exceptions in cases of war or significant military threats. The amendment further states that no court can mandate revenue increases to enforce it, allowing Congress to manage these fiscal constraints through appropriate legislation.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from this amendment. A key concern is the potential for legislative gridlock since exceeding budgetary limits requires a two-thirds majority vote. This could become problematic in times of urgent fiscal needs, such as economic crises or national emergencies. Another issue is the constraint of keeping government spending to a maximum of 18% of GDP, which may hinder the government's capacity to address national needs effectively during downturns or unforeseen scenarios.
Furthermore, this proposal requires a three-fifths majority to increase the federal debt limit, potentially delaying necessary responses in financial crises due to political disagreements. Sections allowing waivers during wartime or military conflicts require clearer definitions for military threats to avoid misuse. Additionally, prohibiting courts from ordering revenue increases might limit judicial oversight over fiscal decisions, affecting accountability.
Impact on the Public
For the public at large, this amendment could bring about a mix of outcomes. On the positive side, it seeks to foster fiscal responsibility by ensuring the government lives within its means, potentially reducing the national debt burden and promoting economic stability in the long term. However, the constraints on spending could lead to limited government action in times of need, impacting services and programs relied upon by citizens—especially during economic downturns when governmental intervention is often needed to stimulate economic recovery.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders might experience varied effects. Lawmakers would face increased pressure to negotiate solutions that satisfy stringent budgetary constraints, potentially increasing political tension and requiring more bipartisan cooperation. For advocacy groups reliant on government funding, the proposed spending limits might threaten their budgets during periods when they are most needed.
Economic stakeholders, such as businesses and investors, might find greater predictability and stability in federal fiscal policy, which could enhance economic confidence. Conversely, during unexpected economic challenges, they may feel the adverse effects of a government hindered in its ability to implement swift, expansive fiscal measures.
Overall, while the proposed amendment aims to promote fiscal responsibility, it introduces complexities and restrictions that could limit the flexibility needed in dynamic economic landscapes, affecting how effectively the government serves its citizens and manages economic challenges.
Issues
The requirement for a two-thirds majority to exceed budgetary constraints, as outlined in Section 1, could lead to legislative gridlock, especially in times requiring urgent fiscal action. This might hinder the government's ability to respond promptly to economic crises or unforeseen events.
Sections 2 and 3 limit total outlays to 18 percent of the GDP, which may be overly restrictive during economic downturns or emergencies, potentially limiting the government's capacity to address national needs effectively.
Section 5 mandates a three-fifths majority to increase the debt limit, which could complicate swift responses to financial crises and may impede necessary adjustments in fiscal policy due to political hurdles.
Sections 6 and 7 allow Congress to waive fiscal provisions during war or significant military conflicts, but the lack of clear criteria for 'imminent and serious military threat' could lead to broad interpretations and potential misuse of this waiver.
Section 8 prohibits courts from ordering revenue increases, possibly limiting judicial checks on legislative or executive actions and affecting legal accountability in fiscal policy enforcement.
Section 4's exclusion of revenue increases from tax rate reductions introduces potential loopholes, allowing indirect revenue increases while still adhering to the letter of the law.
Section 10's reliance on estimates for budget enforcement introduces uncertainties in fiscal projections, raising the risk of inaccuracies or misuse of estimations to fit political agendas.
The vague language in Section 9 regarding 'total receipts' and 'total outlays' could lead to interpretation issues and accounting ambiguities, creating potential challenges in financial reporting and compliance.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
— Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution aims to ensure that government spending does not exceed its income or 18% of the nation's GDP unless Congress approves otherwise with a rollcall vote. It also includes rules on new taxes, debt limits, exceptions for wartime or serious military threats, and stipulates that courts cannot order tax increases to enforce the amendment.
1. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it states that the government's total spending for any fiscal year cannot be more than its total income unless two-thirds of Congress members agree and pass a law allowing extra spending by a rollcall vote.
2. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 2, it states that the total spending for any fiscal year cannot be more than 18% of the United States' gross domestic product (GDP) from the previous calendar year, unless two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate agree to allow more spending through a specific vote.
3. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the President to submit a budget plan to Congress each year that ensures government spending does not exceed the money earned, and that spending is capped at 18% of the country's gross domestic product from the previous year.
4. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any new tax or tax rate increase can only be approved if two-thirds of the Members of both the House and Senate agree through a rollcall vote. Increases in revenue because of lower tax rates aren't counted as actual revenue increases for this rule.
5. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 5, it states that the United States cannot increase its debt limit unless three-fifths of the members in both the House of Representatives and the Senate agree to the increase through a rollcall vote.
6. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has the authority to override certain provisions of this article if there is an active declaration of war and a majority of members in both houses agree to do so through a roll call vote.
7. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has the ability to override certain rules of this article during a fiscal year if the U.S. is involved in a military conflict that poses a significant threat to national security. This override requires a rollcall vote with approval from three-fifths of the members in each House and must specify how much the budget is exceeded due to the conflict.
8. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 8, no court in the United States, whether federal or state, is allowed to command any increase in revenue to make this article effective.
9. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Total receipts are defined as all money received by the United States Government, except money from borrowing. Total outlays are defined as all money spent by the United States Government, except for paying back borrowed money.
10. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has the authority to create laws to put this article into effect, and they can use estimates like spending, income, and total economic output to do so.
11. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies that the article will become effective at the start of the fifth fiscal year following its ratification.