Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles—Phase 3.
ELI5 AI
Congress is thinking about blocking a new rule that was going to make trucks and big vehicles pollute less. If they block it, the rule won't happen, but they're not saying why or what will happen next.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 26 is a joint resolution that expresses Congress's disapproval of a specific rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains to the "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles—Phase 3," which was listed in the Federal Register in April 2024. If the resolution is passed, the rule would be blocked and have no effect. The resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Joint Resolution 26, submitted in the first session of the 119th Congress, aims to express Congress’s disapproval of a specific rule set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule pertains to the greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles, designated as Phase 3, which was featured in the Federal Register on April 22, 2024. Essentially, the bill seeks to nullify this EPA rule, stating that it "shall have no force or effect," thereby annulling the regulatory framework the EPA established for these emissions standards.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the key issues with this resolution is its lack of detail regarding the reasons behind Congress's disapproval of the EPA rule. Without explanation or documentation of the rationale, it leaves stakeholders, including the public, in the dark regarding the justification for this legislative action. Additionally, the resolution does not clarify the implications of declaring the rule as null and void, nor does it address what alternative measures may be considered to manage greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles.
Potential Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill represents a significant shift in policy related to environmental regulation and vehicle emissions. The absence of greenhouse gas standards for heavy-duty vehicles could lead to increased emissions, which may impact public health and contribute to broader climate change issues. On the other hand, if the rule is perceived as overly burdensome or costly, its nullification might be seen as a positive adjustment that could reduce economic strain associated with compliance.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For manufacturers of heavy-duty vehicles, the disapproval of the rule may relieve some regulatory burdens, potentially reducing costs associated with engineering vehicles to meet stringent emissions standards. This might provide short-term financial benefits or competitive advantages. However, it could also lead to long-term uncertainty - if future regulations are enacted that are even more demanding or if court challenges arise from public interest groups.
Environmental groups and advocates are likely to view this action negatively, as it represents a rollback of efforts to control emissions and mitigate climate impacts. Such stakeholders may feel that this resolution undermines progress towards environmental sustainability and public health protection.
In contrast, industries reliant on heavy-duty vehicles might welcome the disapproval as it may prevent operational disruptions or additional costs. However, they too face uncertainty about future regulatory landscapes.
Overall, while the bill aims to provide immediate clarity on the status of the EPA rule, its lack of detail creates more questions than it answers, both in terms of legislative intent and future policy direction.
Issues
The lack of specific details in the text about why the rule is being disapproved could lead to ambiguity and make it difficult for the public and stakeholders to understand Congress's reasoning. This issue is outlined in the section dealing with the absence of specific details and context for the disapproval.
The implications of the rule having no force or effect are not clearly outlined, which could lead to uncertainty about the regulatory status of greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles. Stakeholders, including manufacturers and environmental groups, may be unsure about future requirements or compliance expectations. This concern is highlighted in the section noting the lack of clarity of regulatory implications.
The phrase 'such rule shall have no force or effect' is final but lacks clarity or explanation about the next steps or alternative measures to address greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles. This might result in policy gaps or enforcement challenges, as detailed in the section mentioning the lack of explanation on subsequent actions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that Congress does not agree with the Environmental Protection Agency's rule about greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles and says this rule will not be enforced.