Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers.
ELI5 AI
Imagine the grown-ups in charge want to change the way we keep big fridges super cold, but some other grown-ups in a big meeting decided they don't like that idea and want to stop it before it happens.
Summary AI
The bill H. J. RES. 24 seeks to overturn a regulation from the Department of Energy concerning energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers. This regulation, published in the Federal Register in December 2024, is disapproved by Congress, meaning it should not be enforced or have any effect. The resolution was passed by the House of Representatives and is now being considered by the Senate.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill, H. J. RES. 24, is a resolution that aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule enacted by the Department of Energy. This rule pertains to the Energy Conservation Program, specifically regarding the energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers. Essentially, if this resolution passes, it would nullify the rule, meaning the standards set forth would not be implemented or enforceable.
Key Issues With the Bill
There are several significant issues surrounding this resolution. Firstly, the language "shall have no force or effect" lacks specificity. The bill does not clearly describe the process by which the rule is nullified, which could lead to legal ambiguities. This could create confusion about whether the rule is being effectively canceled and the steps required to achieve disapproval.
Furthermore, the bill does not provide any reasoning or context for Congress's disapproval of the rule. This omission makes it difficult for the public to understand the motivations behind the bill and its broader economic, environmental, or energy-related implications.
Moreover, procedural ambiguity is present. The phrase "submitted by the Department of Energy" suggests a formal submission process but does not outline any additional steps required to finalize disapproval. Such lack of detail might result in procedural delays or challenges.
Lastly, there is a notable issue with the reference to the Federal Register notice (89 Fed. Reg. 104616), which indicates a future date. This discrepancy raises questions about the timing and validity of the notice mentioned, warranting further cross-verification to ensure accuracy.
Impact on the General Public
The broader impact of this bill on the public hinges on its effect on energy efficiency standards. By halting these specific standards, there may be impacts on energy consumption, cost savings, and environmental considerations. Without these standards, businesses and consumers could potentially face higher operational costs due to less efficient cooling systems.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Different stakeholders will likely feel varied impacts. Businesses relying on walk-in coolers and freezers might benefit from avoiding the potential costs of upgrading or replacing equipment to meet new standards. This might ease financial burdens in the short term.
However, for environmental stakeholders and advocates of energy efficiency, this resolution could be seen negatively, as it halts progress toward reducing energy consumption and emissions associated with refrigeration systems.
Overall, while the bill appears to simplify compliance for some, it raises questions about the long-term sustainability and energy efficiency strategies of the United States and their alignment with larger environmental goals.
Issues
The bill's language 'shall have no force or effect' could be clarified to specify the process by which the rule is nullified. This lack of clarity could lead to legal uncertainties regarding the implementation of the disapproval. [Section 1]
The bill text does not provide reasoning or context as to why Congress disapproves the rule, which could aid the public in understanding the economic, environmental, or energy-related implications of this disapproval. [Section 1]
There is ambiguity regarding the procedural steps involved in the disapproval after the formal submission of the rule by the Department of Energy, as the term 'submitted by the Department of Energy' does not outline if additional steps are necessary. This could lead to procedural delays or challenges. [Section 1]
The reference to the Federal Register notice (89 Fed. Reg. 104616) should be cross-verified for accuracy as it lists a future date of December 23, 2024. This discrepancy raises questions about the timing and validity of the notice referenced in the bill. [Section 1]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that Congress disapproves a rule made by the Department of Energy about energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers, meaning the rule will not be enforced.