Overview
Title
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States related to the public debt.
ELI5 AI
The bill suggests changing the rules so that the government can't spend more money than it earns, unless it borrows a little bit more than it already owes. This would need approval from several parts of the government and even the states if they want to borrow more.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 229 proposes an amendment to the U.S. Constitution concerning the management of public debt. The amendment requires that government spending not exceed income unless the excess is covered by authorized debt, initially capped at 105% of current debt levels. The President must enforce debt limits, and any new tax laws would need a two-thirds approval in Congress, unless they are replacing existing income taxes with a sales tax. The amendment seeks to ensure strict control over national debt while allowing for state approval of any debt increase beyond the initial cap.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed amendment, H. J. RES. 229, introduces significant changes to the financial governance of the United States by establishing a balanced budget framework. This proposal would amend the U.S. Constitution to ensure that government spending does not exceed its income, except when exceeded through strictly controlled debt. The amendment requires prior state approval for any increases in national debt and imposes stringent conditions on the legislative process for introducing new or increased general revenue taxes.
Summary of Significant Issues
A central concern with the proposal is its imposition of strict financial constraints even during emergencies, where swift economic responses are necessary. The requirement for state legislatures to approve increases in the debt limit could considerably delay essential financial actions. Furthermore, the amendment includes complex legal terms and conditions, such as "quid pro quo" and "impeachable misdemeanor," which could lead to enforcement challenges and political conflicts.
Another considerable issue is the two-thirds approval requirement from Congress for any changes to general revenue taxes, which may severely limit the government's ability to quickly adapt fiscal policies in response to economic fluctuations.
Impact on the Public
The broad impact of this amendment on the public could be significant. Its stringent limits on government spending could lead to reduced flexibility in addressing economic crises or national emergencies, potentially affecting public services and economic stability. The procedural complexity involved in approving debt increases could also lead to delays that might hinder urgent financial decisions and create uncertainty in the government’s economic policies.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government and Legislators: The proposed amendment would place a substantial burden on federal government operations and could result in lengthy legislative processes. The need to seek state approval for debt increases could strain federal-state relations and slow down decision-making processes.
State Legislatures: The responsibility to approve federal debt increases places additional pressure on state legislatures, potentially embroiling them in national financial decisions and complicating their legislative agendas.
The President: The requirement for presidential impoundment actions when debt approaches its limits presents both procedural and political challenges. The undefined nature of terms like "impeachable misdemeanor" creates risks of political conflict.
Taxpayers and General Public: The hurdles in modifying tax policies might result in rigid and outdated tax systems, affecting economic growth and fiscal policy responsiveness. Conversely, taxpayers could potentially benefit from reduced public debt levels and the assurances of fiscal prudence in government spending.
Overall, while the amendment aims to introduce fiscal discipline and accountability, its rigidity and procedural complexity could pose considerable challenges to effective economic governance.
Issues
The proposed amendment imposes strict restrictions on government spending and debt, potentially creating significant challenges during emergencies or unforeseen circumstances where rapid financial action might be necessary. (Section —)
The requirement for approval by state legislatures for any increase in authorized debt could lead to complex implementation issues and significant delays in addressing financial needs. (Section 2, Section 3)
The stipulation that no quid pro quo inducement can be made for the approval of a debt increase measure might be challenging to enforce and could require additional oversight. (Section 3)
The use of the phrase 'total outlays of the Government of the United States shall not exceed total receipts' involves complex legal language, and lacks specific enforcement mechanisms. This ambiguity could lead to non-compliance. (Section 1)
The term 'impeachable misdemeanor' concerning the President's failure to designate or enforce impoundment could lead to political challenges and interpretation issues due to its lack of clarity and potential for political conflict. (Section 4)
The need for a two-thirds vote in Congress for any new or increased general revenue tax proposal could make it extremely difficult to adjust fiscal policies to meet changing economic needs, except under narrowly defined conditions. (Section 5)
The amendment's definition of financial terms such as 'debt,' 'authorized debt,' and 'impoundment' might be too complex or broad, leading to potential loopholes or confusion about legal and financial limits. (Section 6)
The declaration that the article is 'self-enforcing' without detailed enforcement procedures or penalties for non-compliance could weaken its effectiveness upon ratification. (Section 7)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
— Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment aims to balance the U.S. government's spending with its income, allowing excess spending only through strictly regulated debt. It establishes rules for managing debt limits, requiring state approval for increases, and outlines consequences for exceeding set limits, along with specific conditions for passing new revenue taxes.
1. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the U.S. government's total spending should not be more than its total income at any time, unless the extra spending is covered by borrowing money in a way that strictly follows this article.
2. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The outstanding debt should not go beyond the authorized debt, which initially is set at 105% of the debt amount on the effective date. Any increase beyond this original amount must be approved by the legislatures of the various States as outlined in section 3.
3. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress can only increase the authorized debt beyond its initially set amount if it first gets approval from a simple majority of state legislatures, without any bribes or exchanges, and if this doesn't happen within 60 days, the debt stays the same.
4. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If the national debt goes above 98% of the limit set by section 2, the President must announce spending cuts sufficient to stay within the limit. This decision becomes active in 30 days unless Congress proposes an alternative plan of equal or greater savings, which would take effect right away. If the President doesn’t act, it could lead to impeachment, and any debt over the limit is invalid.
5. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A new or increased general revenue tax can only become law if at least two-thirds of each House of Congress agree to it through a roll call vote. However, this rule doesn't apply to a bill that introduces a new sales tax replacing all income taxes or that removes or reduces certain tax benefits like exemptions, deductions, or credits.
6. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines important terms related to the government’s finances, such as "debt" being the money the government owes, "outstanding debt" as the total debt currently owed, "authorized debt" as the maximum debt allowed by law, and clarifies what counts as government spending and income. It also explains "impoundment" as a decision not to spend money that Congress has set aside, and describes "general revenue tax" as taxes like income or sales tax, but not tariffs.
7. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the article takes effect immediately after it is ratified, it does not require additional rules to be effective, but Congress can pass laws to help enforce it.