Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions.
ELI5 AI
H. J. RES. 228 is like Congress deciding to say "no" to a new rule that tries to make oil and gas companies pay for certain pollution. They want to stop this rule from having any power.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 228 is a legislative proposal aimed at canceling a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule involves procedures for a "Waste Emissions Charge" on petroleum and natural gas systems, focusing on compliance methods. The bill suggests that this EPA rule, published in November 2024, should not have any legal power or effect.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The bill titled "H. J. RES. 228," presented by Mr. Pfluger and Mr. Arrington, seeks congressional disapproval of a particular rule set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule deals with the "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems," focusing on procedures for compliance, including netting and exemptions. By passing this resolution, Congress would effectively nullify the rule, preventing it from being implemented or enforced.
Significant Issues
The primary issue with this bill lies in its lack of clarity regarding the rationale behind Congress's disapproval of the EPA's rule. The absence of specific reasoning makes it difficult for the public and stakeholders to understand why the rule was deemed unacceptable. Details about the rule, as referenced by the formal citation "89 Fed. Reg. 91094," might be obscure to those not familiar with the federal register, hindering public accessibility and comprehension.
Furthermore, the bill does not elaborate on the procedural elements like "Netting and Exemptions," which are crucial components of the EPA's rule. This lack of context challenges stakeholders' ability to interpret the significance and potential implications of the disapproval.
Potential Public Impact
The disapproval of this EPA rule might have broad implications for environmental policy and regulatory frameworks within the United States. For the general public, there could be both positive and negative consequences. On one hand, those who believe in strict environmental regulations might view the disapproval as a setback in efforts to address emissions and combat climate change. On the other hand, individuals and businesses concerned with the economic burden of regulatory compliance might welcome the relief from potential costs associated with adhering to the rule.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The resolution's passage could be positively viewed by stakeholders in the petroleum and natural gas industries, as it removes a layer of regulatory oversight that could impose additional costs or operational changes. Industrial stakeholders often argue that such regulations could threaten economic competitiveness and increase operational expenses.
Conversely, environmental advocacy groups might perceive this congressional disapproval as a negative step, possibly hindering progress towards reducing emissions from significant industrial sources. These groups prioritize the implementation of robust regulations as essential for environmental protection and public health.
In summary, the bill reflects a complex intersection of environmental policy and economic considerations, where the absence of detailed reasoning presents challenges in fully understanding its broader implications. While some stakeholders may benefit economically, others might be concerned about the potential environmental fallout.
Issues
The bill lacks specific reasons for Congress's disapproval of the Environmental Protection Agency's rule, creating ambiguity around the motivations and concerns, which is critical given the broader implications for environmental policy and regulatory practices. (Section: general)
The potential consequences of the rule's disapproval are not detailed in the bill. Understanding how this might impact environmental regulations and the economic landscape is crucial for both policymakers and the general public. (Section: general)
The formal citation of the rule ('89 Fed. Reg. 91094') may be challenging for those unfamiliar with federal register citations, potentially obstructing public understanding and accessibility. Simplifying these references could improve clarity. (Section: general)
The bill does not explain the procedural aspects, such as 'Netting and Exemptions,' that are part of the EPA rule. Without this context, it is difficult for stakeholders to assess the significance and implications of the rule. (Section: general)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has decided not to approve a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency that deals with managing waste emissions from petroleum and natural gas systems, meaning the rule won’t be implemented or enforced.