Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Labor Relations Board relating to Representation Case Procedures: Election Bars; Proof of Majority Support In Construction Industry Collective-Bargaining Relationships.
ELI5 AI
H. J. RES. 205 is like a rule in a game that wants to erase another rule because some people think it's not good, but it doesn't say why or what new rule to use instead.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 205 is a joint resolution aimed at cancelling a specific rule made by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). This rule is about procedures in representation cases, including election bars and proving majority support in collective-bargaining relationships within the construction industry. If passed, the resolution would make it so that the rule has no effect. The resolution was introduced by Mr. Palmer and has been sent to the Committee on Education and the Workforce for consideration.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The joint resolution, titled H. J. RES. 205, introduced in the 118th Congress, addresses a specific regulatory rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). The rule pertains to "Representation Case Procedures: Election Bars; Proof of Majority Support In Construction Industry Collective-Bargaining Relationships." The core of this bill is to disapprove this NLRB rule, rendering it legally ineffective.
Significant Issues
Lack of Clarity on Reasons for Disapproval
One major issue is that the text of the resolution does not explicitly mention why Congress seeks to disapprove the NLRB's rule. This lack of transparency might cause confusion or concern among stakeholders and the general public who are looking for a rationale behind this legislative action.
Regulatory Uncertainty
The resolution states that the NLRB's rule will "have no force or effect" but does not indicate what will replace it. This leaves a potential gap in the regulatory framework affecting collective bargaining in the construction industry, which could create uncertainty for employers, employees, and unions.
Accessibility and Understandability
The language of the bill is technical and legislative, possibly making it challenging for individuals without legal expertise to understand fully. Furthermore, its reference to a specific entry in the Federal Register assumes a level of familiarity that many might not have, thus reducing accessibility.
Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
General Public
For the general populace, the immediate impacts may not be directly noticeable unless one is involved in or affected by collective bargaining in the construction industry. However, it highlights a broader theme of congressional oversight on regulatory bodies, an aspect that can influence many labor-related issues.
Specific Stakeholders
- Construction Industry Employees and Unions: For those directly involved in construction collective bargaining, this bill could create uncertainty regarding labor rights and negotiation conditions. Without the NLRB rule, existing practices may be delayed, leading to a period of adjustment.
Employers in the Construction Industry: Employers might face challenges in determining how to proceed with collective bargaining without the structure provided by the now-overturned rule. This could potentially complicate labor relations.
Legal and Policy Experts: Professionals in law and policy might engage more deeply with legislative and regulatory processes, analyzing the gap left by the disapproved rule and advocating for a structured alternative.
In summary, while the resolution aims to reject a specific regulatory approach, it also opens up discussions around legislative processes, regulatory clarity, and the overall impact on labor relations within specific industries. The outcome could affect how labor negotiations proceed and are structured in the construction sector, with broader implications for regulatory oversight.
Issues
The bill text references a rule from the National Labor Relations Board but does not clearly elucidate the specific reasons for its disapproval, which might cause ambiguity and leaves the general public without the necessary context to understand the implications. [Section-issues]
The resolution uses the phrase 'shall have no force or effect' but does not provide guidance on what will replace the disapproved rule, potentially leading to regulatory uncertainty in the affected industries. [Section-issues]
The technical and legislative language used in the resolution might make it difficult for individuals who are not familiar with legal terminology to fully understand the content, reducing accessibility for the general public. [Section-issues]
Reference to '89 Fed. Reg. 62952 (August 1, 2024)' assumes a level of familiarity with the Federal Register that the general public may not possess, further reducing the accessibility and clarity of the bill for non-specialists. [Section-issues]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress rejects the rule made by the National Labor Relations Board about procedures for holding elections and proving majority support in construction industry collective bargaining. This rule will not have any legal effect.