Overview
Title
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
ELI5 AI
The bill is like a rule for the country's money, saying the government can't spend more than it earns each year, like how someone shouldn't spend more than they have in their piggy bank. It also says the government needs a lot of people to agree if it wants to make new ways to collect money, like taxes.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 2 proposes an amendment to the United States Constitution requiring that government spending does not exceed its income each fiscal year, effectively mandating a balanced budget. The amendment also states that any increase in the public debt of the United States is prohibited. Additionally, it requires that all new laws for raising revenue must pass each House of Congress with a two-thirds majority vote through roll call.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The proposed joint resolution, H.J. Res. 2, seeks to amend the United States Constitution with a balanced budget requirement, fiscal constraints on national debt, and a supermajority requirement for revenue-increasing legislation. The amendment outlines three key provisions: firstly, the amendment mandates that government spending in any fiscal year must not exceed its revenue; secondly, it prohibits increasing the limit on the public debt; and thirdly, it requires a two-thirds majority vote in both Houses of Congress to pass any bill aimed at increasing revenue.
Summary of Significant Issues
One principal issue with the proposed amendment is its potential to hinder the government’s fiscal flexibility. By mandating a balanced budget, it could limit the government’s ability to respond to economic crises or emergencies requiring increased spending. Furthermore, the prohibition on raising the debt limit could similarly constrain fiscal operations and borrowing capacity, affecting national stability.
The requirement for a supermajority vote to increase revenue is another significant concern. It may lead to legislative gridlock, making it challenging to adjust tax policies in response to shifting economic conditions. Additionally, the proposal lacks definitions for crucial terms like "total outlays" and "total receipts," leading to potential legal ambiguities. The amendment also does not specify enforcement mechanisms, raising questions about compliance.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
For the general public, this proposal presents a mixed bag of potential outcomes. On one hand, a balanced budget could theoretically lead to improved fiscal responsibility and reduced deficit spending. This might result in a more stable economy in the long term. On the other hand, the strict limitations on spending and borrowing could hinder the government’s ability to provide necessary services and economic stimulus during downturns or emergencies, potentially leading to reductions in public services or support.
Specific stakeholders, such as policymakers and economists, might respond differently to this proposal. Fiscal conservatives might view these measures as necessary steps toward fiscal discipline, applauding the constraints as a means to reduce national debt and avoid deficit spending. However, economists and policymakers who prioritize flexibility and responsive fiscal policy might argue that these restrictions could hinder economic growth and stability, especially during times of financial crisis.
For the legislative branches, achieving the required supermajority for revenue-increasing bills could prove especially challenging, potentially limiting Congress's ability to respond to and manage fiscal needs effectively. This may affect the legislation speed and adaptability, making it difficult to implement timely measures to address evolving economic or social needs.
In conclusion, while H.J. Res. 2 aims to instill greater fiscal responsibility within the federal government, its rigid constraints pose significant risks and challenges. The complexities of managing a national budget in a dynamic economic environment might be hampered by such inflexible requirements, raising questions about practicality and potential unintended consequences for various sectors of society.
Issues
The proposed amendment in Section 1 for a balanced budget could undermine the government's ability to respond flexibly to economic crises or emergencies that require increased spending, which could be significant politically and financially.
Section 2's stipulation that the national debt limit held by the public shall not be increased may limit fiscal flexibility and severely impact the government's ability to borrow during critical times, potentially affecting national economic stability.
The requirement in Section 3 for a two-thirds rollcall vote in each House to approve any revenue-increasing bill could lead to gridlock in fiscal legislation, hindering the government's ability to adjust tax policies to changing economic circumstances.
The lack of specific definitions for key terms such as 'total outlays,' 'total receipts,' and 'debt of the United States' in the proposal might lead to varying interpretations and legal challenges.
There is no specified enforcement mechanism in the proposed amendment, raising questions about how compliance with these constitutional provisions would be ensured.
The absence of outlined exceptions or contingency plans for unforeseen emergencies in any section might lead to significant practical challenges in implementing the balanced budget requirement if emergencies necessitate higher spending.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution includes three main points: (1) Government spending in a fiscal year cannot exceed its income for that year; (2) The public debt limit of the United States cannot be raised; and (3) Any bill that increases revenue must get approval from two-thirds of both Houses of Congress through a roll call vote.
1. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it states that the government's spending for any given year should not be more than the money it receives in that same year.
2. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that the amount of debt the United States can owe the public will not be increased.
3. Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In Section 3, a bill aimed at increasing revenue can only become law if it is approved by at least two-thirds of the members in each house of Congress, and this must be done through a rollcall vote.