Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission relating to Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2024.
ELI5 AI
H. J. RES. 197 is a message from people in Congress saying they don’t like a new fee plan made by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and they want to make sure it doesn't happen. This plan is about how they charge for certain things in 2024, and Congress is saying, "Let's stop it before it starts!"
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 197 is a joint resolution that expresses Congress's disapproval of a rule issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This rule deals with fee schedules and recovering fees for the fiscal year 2024. If Congress approves this resolution, the NRC's rule will become ineffective and will not be enforced. The resolution was introduced in the House on August 2, 2024, and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The joint resolution, titled H. J. RES. 197, aims to reject a rule proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The rule in question pertains to the "Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2024." Once rejected by Congress, this rule would have "no force or effect," meaning it would not be enforced or implemented.
Significant Issues
The resolution does not provide any explicit reasons as to why Congress seeks to disapprove the NRC's rule. This lack of reasoning might lead to confusion and speculation about the motivations behind the disapproval. It affects public comprehension and can raise questions regarding transparency and accountability in legislative processes.
Additionally, the repercussions of not implementing the fee schedule rule are not addressed in the resolution. Without details regarding the potential impacts, stakeholders—including the NRC and entities it regulates—may find it challenging to plan for future financial and operational scenarios.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the disapproval of this rule may seem abstract, particularly in the absence of a clear explanation. However, the rule's intended purpose likely involves financial management related to nuclear regulatory functions. If the fee schedule is meant to facilitate these functions, its absence might affect how effectively the NRC can carry out its regulatory duties.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The principal stakeholders affected by this resolution are the NRC and industries that fall under its regulatory authority, such as nuclear energy companies. For the NRC, the fee schedule is presumably linked to its funding and operational budgeting for fiscal year 2024. Disapproving the rule may hinder its financial planning, potentially affecting projects and regulatory activities.
For nuclear industries, the disapproval might relieve immediate financial burdens associated with the fee schedule, if it was perceived as costly or burdensome. Conversely, inconsistent regulatory funding could lead to challenges related to oversight and compliance, ultimately affecting the industry's efficiency and the safety measures employed.
Conclusion
The resolution raises important concerns about legislative transparency and accountability. By disapproving a rule without providing clear reasons or considering the broader implications, it highlights a potential gap in legislative communication. Both the general public and specific stakeholders may feel uncertain about the decision's rationale and its potential impact on regulatory operations and financial stability.
Issues
The lack of a clear reason for the congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission could impact public understanding and trust, as it is unclear why Congress objects to this rule and what the intended outcome of the disapproval is. (Section: Issues related to unclear reason for disapproval)
The absence of an explanation of the potential impacts of not implementing the rule raises concerns about transparency and accountability. Without this information, it is difficult for stakeholders to assess the consequences, potentially affecting the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's operations and financial planning. (Section: Issues related to potential impact)
The bill does not provide any context or background on the fee schedules and their significance, which can lead to a lack of understanding among the general public and policymakers regarding the importance or function of the rule being disapproved. This lack of transparency may pose issues in evaluating the necessity and impact of the bill. (Section: Issues related to lack of context)
The use of specific jargon such as 'Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2024' without adequate explanation can make the bill difficult to understand for those who are not familiar with the subject matter, potentially alienating some stakeholders and reducing public engagement. (Section: Issues related to understanding specific jargon)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress is rejecting a rule proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about fee schedules for 2024, and the rule will not be enforced.