Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration relating to National Performance Management Measures; Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Measure.
ELI5 AI
Imagine you have rules for playing with toys, and Congress wants to stop a new rule that tells how much the cars from the toy highways should play. This bill is like saying, "We don't want this new rule for these toy cars and highways," so it shouldn't count anymore.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 114 is a joint resolution that aims to block a specific rule by the Federal Highway Administration. This rule involves measuring the performance of the National Highway System and assessing greenhouse gas emissions. The joint resolution expresses Congress's disapproval, stating that this rule should not have any legal power or effect. It has been referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for review.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The joint resolution, identified as H. J. RES. 114, is a legislative action introduced in the House of Representatives. Its primary purpose is to disapprove a rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This rule pertains to national performance management measures, specifically focusing on the performance assessment of the National Highway System and the measurement of greenhouse gas emissions. Essentially, the resolution aims to nullify the FHWA rule, preventing it from taking effect.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the resolution:
Lack of Clarity: The resolution does not specify the reasons for Congress's disapproval of the FHWA's rule. This lack of clarity might keep stakeholders and the public in the dark about the motivations behind this legislative move.
Complex Language: The language used in the resolution may be difficult for the general public to understand, potentially limiting public engagement and comprehension of the legislative intent.
Transparency Concerns: Without a detailed explanation for why the rule is being rejected, there may be concerns regarding transparency and accountability. Stakeholders might question the absence of supporting justification for this decision.
Impact on the Public
The disapproval of the FHWA rule could have various implications for the public:
Regulatory Effects: By nullifying this rule, Congress might be signaling a shift or halt in regulatory measures aimed at assessing and managing the performance of highways and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This could affect national efforts to address climate change and infrastructure performance.
Public Understanding: The complexity and lack of clarity in the resolution may contribute to public confusion. Citizens might find it challenging to understand why certain environmental measures are being discontinued.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The resolution can have differing impacts on specific stakeholders:
Environmental Advocates: They may view this resolution negatively, perceiving it as a setback to efforts aimed at monitoring and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the highway system. Such groups often advocate for increased transparency and regulatory measures to address environmental issues.
Transportation and Infrastructure Agencies: These bodies might face uncertainty about future performance assessment metrics and standards, which could hinder long-term planning and compliance efforts.
Legislators and Policymakers: Those in favor of limited government intervention in regulatory matters might see this as a positive step toward reducing what they perceive as unnecessary or burdensome regulations. Conversely, others might critique the lack of public rationale and dialogue that accompanies the resolution.
Overall, the resolution reflects congressional oversight over federal regulations and emphasizes the divisive nature of managing environmental and infrastructural performance in legislative discourse.
Issues
The bill lacks clarity on the specific reasons for disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Highway Administration, which could result in confusion and misunderstanding among the public and stakeholders. [Section Related: The specific reason for disapproving the rule is not stated, leading to a lack of clarity on the issue.]
The language of the bill is somewhat complex and could be simplified to be more accessible to the general public. This complexity can hinder public understanding and engagement with the legislative process. [Section Related: The language is somewhat complex and could be simplified for better understanding by the general public.]
There is no detailed explanation or justification provided for why the rule shall have no force or effect, which may raise transparency and accountability concerns among legislators and the public. [Section Related: There is no detailed explanation or justification for why the rule 'shall have no force or effect,' which may lead to transparency concerns.]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has decided to reject a rule from the Federal Highway Administration about measuring the performance of highways and tracking greenhouse gas emissions. This means the rule will not be put into effect.