Overview
Title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121.
ELI5 AI
The big group of people in charge of making rules (Congress) said they don't like a new rule made by the people who check money stuff (the SEC) because they think it shouldn't be a rule at all. So now, they're telling everyone that this new money rule shouldn't count anymore.
Summary AI
H. J. RES. 109 is a joint resolution by the United States Congress expressing disapproval of a rule by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." The resolution declares that this rule should have no legal power or effect. The opinion that classified this bulletin as a rule was printed in the Congressional Record on November 1, 2023. The resolution was passed by the House of Representatives on May 8, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill in question, H. J. RES. 109, is a joint resolution from the 118th Congress, which seeks to reject a rule established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This rule is related to the “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121,” initially published in the Federal Register in April 2022. Congress, by passing this resolution, expresses its disapproval, ensuring that the rule has no legal effect or applicability.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with this bill is the lack of clear context regarding why Congress decided to disapprove the SEC's rule. The absence of explicit reasons and underlying motives leaves the public with limited understanding of the legislative intent. Without this context, it is challenging to grasp the implications and motivations behind this decision.
Furthermore, referencing "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121" and associated legal documents presumes a certain level of familiarity with technical, financial, and legal jargon that many may not possess. This complexity can alienate individuals who do not have a background in these fields, thus limiting public accessibility and understanding.
The phrase stating that the rule "shall have no force or effect" also requires more elaboration to convey its practical meaning. Stakeholders, such as businesses or financial entities affected by the rule, need clarity regarding how this disapproval will translate into real-world changes.
Lastly, the dense and technical language found in the bill may act as a barrier for the general public, making it difficult for individuals to engage with and understand the legislative content meaningfully.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the general public, the disapproval of the rule may seem inconsequential without a comprehensive understanding of what the “Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121” entails. If the rule was designed to improve transparency or protect consumers in financial markets, its rejection might mean that such protections remain unrealized. Conversely, if the rule was perceived as burdensome or overly complex, disapproval could be seen as a relief.
Nevertheless, the lack of detailed explanations leaves the public guessing about the broader impact of this legislative decision on financial stability, market practices, and investor protection.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, particularly those in the financial sector or regulatory environment, will feel the effects of this bill more directly. Financial institutions and professionals who must comply with SEC guidelines will need to adjust their practices according to Congress's disapproval.
For regulatory bodies like the SEC, this disapproval serves as a check on their rule-making authority, signaling the need for alignment with congressional expectations and legislative priorities.
For investors and companies regulated by these guidelines, the impact varies. They may benefit from reduced compliance burdens if the rule was considered restrictive, but could also face uncertainty or risks if the regulation offered crucial guidance or protection no longer available post-disapproval. Understanding these nuances requires further clarification and transparency about the intended effects of the bulletin and the consequences of its disapproval.
Issues
The bill lacks clear context about why Congress disapproves of the rule submitted by the SEC regarding Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121. This ambiguity makes it difficult for the public to understand the motives and implications of the disapproval, potentially undermining transparency and accountability. This issue is significant because understanding legislative intent is crucial for democratic engagement. [Section Issues]
The reference to 'Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121' and various legal documents might be overly complex for individuals without a legal or financial background, limiting public understanding and engagement. Simplifying or providing additional explanations could help make the text more accessible. [Section Issues]
The statement that the rule 'shall have no force or effect' requires additional clarification on the practical implications and execution process, which is vital for stakeholders to comprehend the real-world consequences of the disapproval. This clarity is important because it directly affects how laws and regulations are implemented and adhered to. [Section Issues]
The language used in the bill text is technical and dense, which may hinder accessibility and understanding for the general public. This is an important issue because legislative texts should be understandable to ensure public participation and oversight. [Section Issues]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress has decided to reject a rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission that relates to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." This decision is based on the conclusion that this bulletin is considered a rule under a specific chapter of U.S. law, and therefore, it will not be effective.