Overview

Title

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121.

ELI5 AI

H. J. RES. 109 is like Congress saying, "We don't want to follow this new rule from a group that helps with counting money because we don't agree with it, so let's make it go away." This means they think the rule shouldn't count or be used anymore.

Summary AI

H. J. RES. 109 is a legislative measure that expresses Congress's disapproval of a rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission about "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." This bulletin was considered a rule as per chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code. By passing this resolution, Congress intends to nullify the rule, meaning it will no longer have any legal effect.

Published

2024-05-22
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: JOINT
Status: Enrolled Bill
Date: 2024-05-22
Package ID: BILLS-118hjres109enr

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
176
Pages:
1
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 65
Verbs: 10
Adjectives: 4
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 17
Entities: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
25.14
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
14.50

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Joint Resolution 109 is a legislative measure expressing Congress's disapproval of a particular rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) concerning "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." This bulletin, initially published in the Federal Register in April 2022, involves accounting guidelines or interpretations established by the SEC. By exercising its powers under chapter 8 of title 5 of the U.S. Code, Congress aims to nullify this rule, thereby preventing it from having any legal effect.

Significant Issues

One significant issue with this resolution is its lack of clarity about why the rule disapproval is necessary. The text does not specify the reasons or motivations behind Congress's decision, potentially leading to ambiguity and public confusion. This absence of context raises questions about the implications and consequences of negating the bulletin.

The language used in the bill is notably technical and complex, referencing specific legal and accounting standards that may not be easily understood by the general public. Such complexity can hinder accessibility, making it challenging for those without legal or financial expertise to comprehend the resolution’s purpose and effects.

Another issue is the phrase "such rule shall have no force or effect," which lacks precision regarding its practical results. This uncertainty makes it unclear how exactly the rule's disapproval would impact existing legal or financial practices.

Potential Impact on the Public

The bill, by halting the application of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121, could have widespread implications for how certain accounting practices are conducted across the country. The general public might not feel immediate effects, but the broader accounting standards and financial reporting could see alterations due to this congressional disapproval.

For businesses and accounting professionals, the removal of this SEC bulletin from effect might mean adjustments in procedures or standards they must adhere to. Depending on the bulletin's original intent, such changes could either simplify processes by removing perceived regulatory burdens or create a gap in the guidance previously provided.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Businesses and Accounting Firms: These stakeholders might be significantly affected as they could have been preparing or already implementing changes based on the bulletin's guidelines. The disapproval means they might need to revert to previous practices or await new guidance from the SEC.

Policy Makers and Legal Experts: Individuals in these roles may need to engage in further dialogue or legislative action to address any gaps created by the disapproval. There might be an increased need for clarity and communication to ensure consistent legal and accounting standards.

The Securities and Exchange Commission: The SEC may be prompted to revisit the bulletin or develop alternative guidelines that align with Congress's legislative expectations. This could involve re-assessing the justifications and impacts of proposed rules to avoid similar disapprovals in the future.

In conclusion, while House Joint Resolution 109 targets a specific SEC rule, its broader implications impact numerous sectors reliant on clear and stable accounting standards. Understanding and addressing these changes will be crucial for regulatory bodies, businesses, and legal professionals alike.

Issues

  • The lack of clear context in the bill text regarding why Congress disapproves the rule related to 'Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121' could lead to public confusion about the motives and implications behind this disapproval. As the reasons are not specified, this ambiguity might cause misunderstandings or misrepresentations in political discourse. (Section: Full Text)

  • The technical and dense language used in the bill text, including references to specific legal documents and regulations, may hinder accessibility and understanding for the general public. This complexity might prevent individuals without a legal or financial background from fully grasping the bill's content and its impacts. (Section: Full Text)

  • The phrase 'such rule shall have no force or effect' lacks clarification on its practical implications and execution process. This vagueness could result in uncertainty about how precisely the disapproval affects existing and future applications of the rule within legal and financial frameworks. (Section: Full Text)

  • The reference to 'Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121' and citations to federal registers and opinions from the Government Accountability Office could be overly complex for the average citizen. This complexity could disengage constituents from understanding or participating in discussions related to this resolution. (Section: Full Text)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has decided to reject a rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission that relates to "Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121." This decision is based on the conclusion that this bulletin is considered a rule under a specific chapter of U.S. law, and therefore, it will not be effective.